Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:12:43.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the genetic background of the Rbbl bn Hfʿm grave inscription at Qaryat al-Fāw1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2014

Ahmad Al-Jallad*
Affiliation:
Leiden University

Abstract

It is widely believed that the Rbbl bn Hfʿm grave inscription found at Qaryat al-Fāw is the earliest example of Old Arabic. The ten-line inscription – written in the Sabaic script – attests the common Arabic definite article, ʾl, plus several other non-Sabaic linguistic features. I argue that the definite article is not a suitable diagnostic of genetic affiliation, and other features, such as mimation, the conjunction ʿdky, and more, should also be given consideration. Through a close linguistic examination based on the principle of shared morphological innovations, I demonstrate that none of the morphological innovations which characterize Arabic are attested in this inscription. As such, its language is probably not a descendant of proto-Arabic. Our results further suggest that the ʾl- article, which has previously been used as a marker of Arabic, was simply one of many definite article forms which spread to Arabic, and other Semitic languages of Arabia, through areal diffusion.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS, University of London 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Abbreviations: ASA = Ancient South Arabian; ANA = Ancient North Arabian; PS = Proto-Semitic; CS: Central Semitic; PCS: Proto-Central Semitic; QCT = Quranic Consonantal Text (the rasm). I thank John Huehnergard, Michael C.A. Macdonald and Na'ama Pat-El for their helpful comments and improvements on an earlier draft of this paper. I also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful insights and improvements. Any errors are of course my own.

References

Abbreviations

C

Safaitic inscriptions published in Corpus Inscriptionum Semiticarum. Pars V. Inscriptiones Saracenicas continens, Tomus 1. Inscriptiones Safaiticae (Paris, 1950–51).

KRS

Safaitic inscriptions recorded by G.M.H. King on the Basalt Desert Rescue Survey and published on http://krcfm.orient.ox.ac.uk/fmi/iwp/cgi?-db=AALC_BDRS&-loadframes

SIJ

Safaitic inscriptions published in F.V. Winnett, Safaitic Inscriptions from Jordan (Near and Middle East Series 2. Toronto, 1957).

MSNS

Safaitic inscriptions in S.A. Ma'ani and I.S. Sadaqah, “New Safaitic inscriptions from the Mafraq office Department of Archeology of Jordan” Syria, T. 79, 2002, pp. 249–69.

PAES

Greek and Latin inscriptions in E. Littmann, Publications of the Princeton University Archaeological Expeditions to Syria in 1904–1905. Division III: Greek and Latin Inscriptions. Section A. Southern Syria (Leiden, 1907).

WH

Safaitic and Greek inscriptions, in F.V. Winnett and G.L. Harding, Inscriptions from Fifty Safaitic Cairns (Near and Middle East Series 9. Toronto, 1978).

Safaitic inscriptions published in Corpus Inscriptionum Semiticarum. Pars V. Inscriptiones Saracenicas continens, Tomus 1. Inscriptiones Safaiticae (Paris, 1950–51).

Safaitic inscriptions recorded by G.M.H. King on the Basalt Desert Rescue Survey and published on http://krcfm.orient.ox.ac.uk/fmi/iwp/cgi?-db=AALC_BDRS&-loadframes

Safaitic inscriptions published in F.V. Winnett, Safaitic Inscriptions from Jordan (Near and Middle East Series 2. Toronto, 1957).

Safaitic inscriptions in S.A. Ma'ani and I.S. Sadaqah, “New Safaitic inscriptions from the Mafraq office Department of Archeology of Jordan” Syria, T. 79, 2002, pp. 249–69.

Greek and Latin inscriptions in E. Littmann, Publications of the Princeton University Archaeological Expeditions to Syria in 1904–1905. Division III: Greek and Latin Inscriptions. Section A. Southern Syria (Leiden, 1907).

Safaitic and Greek inscriptions, in F.V. Winnett and G.L. Harding, Inscriptions from Fifty Safaitic Cairns (Near and Middle East Series 9. Toronto, 1978).

Bibliography

Abu-Haidar, F. 1979. A Study of the Spoken Arabic of Baskinta. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Al-Jallad, A., Daniel, R.W. and al-Ghul, O.. 2013. “The Arabic toponyms and Oikonyms in 17”, in Koenen, L., Kaimio, M., Kaimio, J. and Daniel, R. (eds), The Petra Papyri II. Amman: American Center of Oriental Research.Google Scholar
Al-Jallad, A. 2015. “Graeco-Arabica I: The Southern Levant”, in Briquel-Chatonnet, F., Debié, M. and Nehmé, L. (eds), Le contexte de naissance de l'écriture arabe. Écrit et écritures araméennes et arabes au 1er millénaire après J.-C., Actes du colloque international du projet ANR Syrab. Louvain: Peeters (Orientalia Lovaniensa Analecta), 160.Google Scholar
Al-Jallad, A. Forthcoming. An Outline of the Grammar of the Safaitic Inscriptions.Google Scholar
Al-Jallad, A. In preparation. Graeco-Arabica IV: The Psalm Fragment.Google Scholar
Al-Ansari, A.T. 1982. Qaryat al-Faw: A Portrait of Pre-Islamic Civilisation in Saudi Arabia. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Beeston, A.F.L. 1979. “Nemara and Faw”, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 42: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeston, A.F.L., Ghul, M.A., Müller, W.W. and Ryckmans, J.. 1982. Sabaic Dictionary: English–French–Arabic. Louvain-la-Neuve and Beirut: D. Peeters; Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Behnstedt, P. 1985. Die nordjemenitischen Dialekte Tl.1, Atlas. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Behnstedt, P. 2007. “Zum bestimmten Artikel und zur Ortskunde im Jemen”, Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 47: 5059.Google Scholar
Bellamy, J.A. 1985. “A new reading of the Namārah inscription”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 105/1: 3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, J. 2002. A Handbook of Early Middle Arabic. (Max Schloessinger Memorial Series 6.) Jerusalem: Max Schloessinger Memorial Foundation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Dolgopolsky, A.B. 1991. “Two problems of Semitic historical linguistics”, in Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau, 328–39. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Farès-Drappeau, Saba. 2005. Dédan et Liḥyān: Histoire des Arabes aux confins des pouvoirs perse et hellénistique (IVe–IIe avant l'ère chrétienne). Lyon: Maison de l'Orient de la Méditerranée.Google Scholar
Fox, J. 2003. Semitic Noun Patterns. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fronzaroli, P. 1965. “Studi sul lessico comune Semitico III”, Accademia Nazionale Dei Lincei, Rendiconti Della Classe Di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche VIII/XX (3–4), 135–50.Google Scholar
Ghabban, A.I. 2008. “The inscription of Zuhayr, the oldest Islamic inscription (24 ah⁄ad 644–645), the rise of the Arabic script and the nature of the early Islamic state” (trans. Hoyland, Robert G.). Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 19: 210–37.Google Scholar
Gzella, H. 2006. “Die Entstehung des Artikels im Semitischen: Eine ‘phönizische’ Perspektive”, Journal of Semitic Studies, 51: 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ḥarāḥišah, R. 2010. Nuqūš Ṣafāʾiyyah Mina ‘l-Bādiyah al-ʾUrduniyyah. Amman: Ward Books.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R.G. 1974. “La division des langues sémitiques”, in Caquot, A. and Cohen, D. (eds), Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistique Sémitique et Chamito-Sémitque, Paris 16–19 Juillet, 1969, 181–94. The Hague and Paris: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetzron, R.G. 1975. “Genetic classification and Ethiopian Semitic”, in Bynon, J. and Bynon, T. (eds), Hamito-Semitica, 103–27. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R.G. 1976. “Two principles of genetic reconstruction”, Lingua 38: 103–27.Google Scholar
Hoyland, R.G. 2010. “Mount Nebo, Jabal Ramm, and the status of Christian Palestinian Aramaic and Old Arabic in Late Roman Palestine and Arabia” in Macdonald, M.C.A. (ed.), The Development of Arabic as a Written Language, 2945. (Supplement to the Proceedings of the Seminar of Arabian Studies 41.) Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. 1991. “Remarks on the classification of the Northwest Semitic languages”, in Hoftijzer, J. and van der Kooij, G. (eds), The Balaam Text from Deir Alla Re-evaluated. Proceedings of the International Symposium Held at Leiden 21–24 August 1989, 282–93. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. 1998. “What Is Aramaic?”, Aram 7: 265–86.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. 2004. “Afro-Asiatic”, in Woodard, Roger D (ed.), Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World's Ancient Languages, 138–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. 2005. “Features of Central Semitic”, in Gianto, Agustinus (ed.), Biblical and Oriental Essays in Memory of William L. Moran, 155203. (Biblica Et Orientalia 48.) Rome: Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. 2006. “Proto-Semitic and Proto-Akkadian”, in Deutscher, G and Kouwenberg, N.J.C. (eds), The Akkadian Language in Its Semitic Context: Studies in the Akkadian of the Third and Second Millenium BC, 118. Leiden: NINO.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. forthcoming. “Arabic in its Semitic context”, in Al-Jallad, A. (ed.), Arabic in Context. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. and Rubin, A.D.. 2011. “Phyla and waves: models of classification of the Semitic languages”, in Weninger, Stefan, Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. and Watson, Janet C.E. (eds), Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, 851–96. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Koehler, L. and Baumgartner, W.. 2001–2012. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, CD-ROM edition. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kogan, L.E. 2011. “Proto-Semitic lexicon”, in Weninger, Stefan et al. (eds), Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, 179258. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, F.R. 1973. Vom Mesopotamischen Menschen Der Altbabylonischen Zeit und seiner Welt. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kropp, M. 1990. “Pioggia Di Sangue o Pioggia Incessante nell'Arabia Antica? Una Inscrizione Proto-Araba Ritrovata a Qaryat al-Faw”, Quaderni Di Studi Arabi 8: 328.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M.C.A. 2000. “Reflections on the linguistic map of pre-Islamic Arabia”, Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 11/1: 2879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, M.C.A. 2004. “Ancient North Arabian”, in Woodard, Roger D (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World's Ancient Languages, 488533. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M.C.A. 2008. “Old Arabic”, in Versteegh, Kees (ed.), Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M.C.A. 2010. “The Old Arabic graffito at Jabal Usays: a new reading of Line 1”, in Macdonald, M.C.A. (ed.), The Development of Arabic as a Written Language, 141–3. (Supplement to the Proceedings of the Seminar of Arabian Studies 41.) Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Mascitelli, D. 2006. L'arabo in Epoca Preislamica: Formazione Di Una Lingua. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Mavroudi, M. 2008. “Arabic words in Greek letters: the violet fragment and more”, in Grand'Henry, J. and Lentin, J. (eds), Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Middle Arabic and Mixed Arabic Throughout History, Louvain-la-Neuve 11–14 May 2004, 321–54. Peeters.Google Scholar
Miles, G.C. 1948. “Early Islamic inscriptions near Ṭā’if in the Ḥijāz”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 7/4: 236–42.Google Scholar
Del Olmo Lete, G. and Sanmartín, J.. 2004. A Dictionary of the Ugaritic Language in the Alphabetic Tradition. Translated by Watson, W.G.E.. 2 vols. (Handbook of Oriental Studies 6768.) Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pat-El, N. 2009. “The development of the Semitic definite article: a syntactic approach”, Journal of Semitic Studies 54/1 (March 1): 1950. doi:10.1093/jss/fgn039.Google Scholar
Pat-El, N. 2008. “Historical syntax of Aramaic: a note on subordination”, in Gzella, H. and Folmer, M.L. (eds), Aramaic in Its Historical and Linguistic Setting, 5576. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Pat-El, N. and Hackett, J.A.. 2010. “On Canaanite and historical linguistics: a rejoinder to Anson Rainey”, Maarav 17/2: 173–88.Google Scholar
Piamenta, M. 1966. Studies in the Syntax of Palestinian Arabic: Simple Verb Forms in Subordinate and Main Clauses of Complex Sentences. Jerusalem: Israel Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Rabin, C. 1951. Ancient West-Arabian. London: Taylor's Foreign Press.Google Scholar
Robin, C.J. 2001. “Les inscriptions de l'Arabie Antique et les études Arabes”, Arabic 48: 509–77.Google Scholar
Robin, C.J. (ed.). 1992. L'Arabie antique de Karib'îl à Mahomet: nouvelles données sur l'histoire des arabes grâce aux inscriptions. Aix-en-Provence: Edisud.Google Scholar
Rubin, A.D. 2005. Studies in Semitic Grammaticalization. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Ryckmans, J. 1956. “Aspects nouveaux du problème Thamoudéen”, Studia Islamica 5: 517.Google Scholar
Sima, A. 1999. “Etymologisches zu Akkadisch Adi ‘Bis, Bis Zu’ (Prap. Loci Et Temporis)”, Archiv Für Orientforschung 46/47: 213–5.Google Scholar
Tropper, J. 2000. Ugaritische Grammatik. (Alter Orient und Altes Testament 273.) Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tropper, J. 2001. “Die Herausbildung des bestimmten Artikels im Semitischen”, Journal of Semitic Studies 46: 131.Google Scholar
Ullendorff, E. 1977. “The form of the definite article in Arabic and other Semitic languages”, in Is Biblical Hebrew a Language?, 165–71. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Voigt, R. 1998. “Der Artikel im Semitischen”, Journal of Semitic Studies 53/2: 221–58. doi:10.1093/jss/XLIII.2.221.Google Scholar
Weninger, S. 2011. “Reconstructive morphology”, in Weninger, Stefan et al. (eds), Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, 151178. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Winnett, F.V. 1970. Ancient Records from North Arabia. (Near and Middle East Series 6.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Zaborski, A. 2000. “Inflected articles in Proto-Arabic and some other West Semitic languages”, Asian and African Studies 9: 2435.Google Scholar