Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:57:30.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Neolithic Stone Industry of the santal Parganas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

In a previous paper I discussed the typology of two collections of neolithic artifacts from the North Karnataka of India and discovered a close correspondence between them.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 306 note 1The neolithic stone industry of the North Karnataka region’, BSOAS, xix, 2, 1957, 321Google Scholar–35.

page 306 note 2 Allchin, F. R., Piklihal excavations, Hyderabad, 1960, 8595Google Scholar.

page 306 note 3 JASB, LXX, Pt. III, 1901, 1722Google Scholar; JASB, LXXIII, Pt. III, 1904, 27Google Scholar.

page 307 note 1 See Bodding's, Traditions and institutions of the Santals, Oslo, 1942, 322Google Scholar.

page 308 note 1 Dani, A. H., Prehistory and protohistory of eastern India, Calcutta, 1960, 85104Google Scholar. I should like to acknowledge the use I have made of Dr. Dani's work in this paper, particularly in reference to the Assamese and South East Asian distributions of certain types.

page 310 note 1 Allchin, B., ‘The Indian middle stone age; some new sites in central and southern India’,Bull, of Institute of Archaeology, 2, 1959, 11Google Scholar.

page 311 note 1 Allchin, F. R., BSOAS, xix, 2, 1357, 328Google Scholar.

page 312 note 1 Dani, op. cit., 47–8.

page 314 note 1 cf. Allchin, F. R., BSOAS, xix, 2, 1957Google Scholar, fig. 1, no. 6; fig. 3, nos. 23, 24, 26.

page 318 note 1 Allchin, F. E., BSOAS, xix, 2, 1957, fig. 4, nos. 37, 4041Google Scholar; and Subbarao, B., Stone Age cultures of Bellary,1948, pi. xxIII, 112Google Scholar.

page 323 note 1 Dani, op. cit., 1960, 91–100.

page 324 note 1 Allchin, F. R., BSOAS. xix, 2, 1957Google Scholar, fig. 4, no. 38.

page 325 note 1 Burkitt, M. C. and Cammiade, L. A., ‘Fresh light on the stone ages in southeast India’, Antiquity iv, 15, 1930, 327Google Scholar–39.

page 325 note 2 These were discovered by Dr. R. D. Ghosh of the Ashutosh Museum, Calcutta, and were noted during my visit to the Museum in 1951, being hitherto unpublished.

page 326 note 1 Walsh, , JASB, LXXIII, Pt. in, 1904, 20Google Scholar–4.

page 326 note 1 Anderson, J., Report on the expedition to western Yunnan, via Bhamo, Calcutta, 1871, App. C, 410Google Scholar–15.

page 326 note 3 No. 5 of Anderson's note; and Dr. Dani's pi. 18, no. 14.

page 327 note 1 Anderson, C. W., ‘Note on prehistoric stone implements found in the Singhbhum district’, JBORS, III, 3, 1917, 349Google Scholar–62.

page 328 note 1 Dani, op. cit., 1960, 88–9.

page 328 note 2 Sen, D., ‘A celt-site in Singbhum’, Man in India, xxx, 1, 1950, 112Google Scholar.

page 328 note 3 Ray, G. S., ‘Microlithic industry of Bongara, Manbhum’, Man in India, xxxiv, 1, 1954, 1619Google Scholar.

page 328 note 4 Goswami, K. G., Excavations at Bangarh, 1948, 32Google Scholar.

page 329 note 1 Indian Archaeology, 1954–55, a review, 1920Google Scholar.

page 329 note 2 Indian Archaeology, 1956–57, a review, 1920Google Scholarand pi. xxvb.