Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:54:24.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The naming of the frontier: ՙAwāṣim, Thughūr, and the Arab geographers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Michael Bonner
Michael Bonner
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Arabic geographical literature of the Middle Ages used several terms to indicate limits and frontiers, including āfāq, ḥudūd and tukhūm. For the external frontiers of Islam itself the term most commonly used was thughūr (sg. thaghr). And among these it was the Arab-Byzantine frontier, which to some was the frontier par excellence, which came closest to having a nomenclature peculiar to itself. In this essay I wish to demonstrate that this nomenclature, and the picture which we have of this region, do not derive from administrative history so much as from a series of superimpositions made by medieval writers on geography and related subjects. I intend to follow Professor Wansbrough's lead, by showing the consequences of the ‘use by many of the same (limited) sources of information’. I also wish to emphasize that differences over how things are to be named reflect conflicts over who is to have power over them.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 17 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jaՙfar, Qudāma b., Kitāb al-Kharāj, BGA (=Bibliotheca Geographorum Arabicorum, Leiden, 1967), vol. 6, 252fGoogle Scholar.

2 Wansbrough, J., ‘Africa and the Arab geographers’, in Dalby, D. (ed.), Language and history in Africa (New York, 1970), 89–101Google Scholar.

3 Nicely illustrated by the maps at Kennedy, H., The Prophet and the age of the Caliphates (London and New York, 1986), 408–10Google Scholar. See the detailed discussion, with references, in Canard, M., Histoire de la dynastie des H'amdanides (Paris, 1953), 226–86Google Scholar; ibid., El (2nd ed.), I, 761–2. See also Strange, G. Le, Lands of the Eastern Caliphate (Cambridge, 1930), 128–34Google Scholar; Honigmann, E., Die Oslgrenze des byzantinischen Reiches (Brussels, 1935), 39–41Google Scholar; Osman, F., al-Hudud al-islāmiyya al-bīzantiyya (Cairo, 1967–68), i, 129–282Google Scholar; Shaban, M. A., Islamic history, ii (Cambridge, 1976), 28–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Janzūrī, A. [?], al-Thughūr al-barriyya al-islā miyya (Cairo, 1979), 7–19Google Scholar; Haldon, J. F. and Kennedy, H., ‘The Arab-Byzantine frontier in the eighth and ninth centuries’, Zbornik radova Visantoloshkog Instituta, 19, 1980, 106fGoogle Scholar.

4 Three according to Qudāma, 254–5; cf. Canard, , H'amdanides, 254–61Google Scholar.

5 Details at Canard, , H'amdanides, 213, 223, 232; El (2nd ed.), i, 761Google Scholar.

6 Balādhurī, , Futūh al-buldān (Leiden, 1866, repr. 1968), 132Google Scholar.

7 al-Athīr, Ibn, al-Kāmil fī՚l-ta'rīkh (Leiden, 1867–76), iv, 361Google Scholar; see also Balādhurī, , Futūh, 200Google Scholar.

8 Bates, M., ‘The Dirham mint of the northern provinces of the Umayyad Caliphate’, Armenian Numismatic Journal, 15, 1989, 89–111Google Scholar; Spellberg, D. A., ‘The Umayyad North: numismatic evidence for frontier administration’, American Numismatic Society Museum Notes, 33, 1988, 119–27Google Scholar. For a reflex of this ‘Umayyad North’ in geographical literature, see Ya'qūbī, , Kitābal-Buldāan (BGA, vol. 7), 320Google Scholar.

9 This is borne out by the list of later Umayyad ṣawā'if at Khaldūn, Ibn, Ta՚īkh (Beirut, 1956 ff.), in, 284–7Google Scholar.

10 Ṭabarī, , Ta'rīkh (Leiden, 1879–1901), III, 57–8Google Scholar; Ya'qūbī, , Ta'rīkh (Leiden, 1883), n, 430.Google Scholar

11 Ya'qūbī, Ta'rīkh, II, 461.Google Scholar

12 For instance, see the conflicting versions of the rebuilding of Malatya and the expedition of 139, in Ṭabarī, in, 125; Azdī, , Ta՚rīkh al-Mawsil (Cairo, 1967), 171Google Scholar; Yaՙqūbī, , Ta՚rīkh, ii, 469Google Scholar; Balādhurī, , 186–7Google Scholar; Khayyāṭ, Khalīfa b., Ta՚rīkh (Damascus, 1968), 640–41Google Scholar; Ibn al-'Adīm, . Zubda (Damascus, 1951), 59.Google Scholar

13 Ṭabarī, , III, 545Google Scholar; cf. Laurent, J., L'Arménie entre Byzance et I'Islam depuis la conquête arabe jusqu'en 887 (Paris, 1919), 9–34.Google Scholar

14 Balādhurī, , 190–91Google Scholar; Bonner, M., ‘The mint of Hārūnābād and al-Hārūniyya, 168–171 H.’, American Journal of Numismatics, Second Series, 1, 1989, 177–8.Google Scholar

15 M., Bonner, art. cit., 171–81.Google Scholar

16 Yazīd b. Mazyad and Khuzayma b. Khāzim in particular. See Bonner, M., ‘Al-khalīfa almardī: The accession of Hārūn al-Rashīd’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 101, 1988, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Moscati, S., ‘Studi storici sul califfato di al-Mahdi’, Orientalia, 15, 1946, 309–18, 325–9.Google Scholar

18 Ṭabarī, , III, 604Google Scholar; al-Athīr, Ibn, VI, 75Google Scholar; Abū 'l-Fidā, ’, al-Mukhtasar fī akhbār al-bashar (Beirut, 1972), II, 12.Google Scholar

19 Azdī, , 262.Google Scholar

20 Balādhurī, , 132.Google Scholar

21 Balādhurī, 132 (for 173 A. H. ). ՙAbd al-Malik had been dismissed from the governorship of Mosul in 171 A.H.: Azdī, 267.

22 Balādhurī, , 170Google Scholar; Chronique de Michel le Syrien (Paris, 1899–1910), III, 8.Google Scholar

23 Khalīfa, , 713–18Google Scholar; Balādhurī, , 185Google Scholar; Ya'qūbī, , Ta'rīkh, ii, 522Google Scholar; Azdī, , 270, 274 (ahl al-thughūr jamī'anGoogle Scholar); Tabarī, , III, 610, 612, 628.Google Scholar

24 The claim of Shaban, Islamic history, ii, 28–30Google Scholar, that the ‘old’ front-line positions were abandoned in favour of ‘new’, commercially favorable ones is not clearly supported by the sources. See Haldon, and Kennedy, , ‘The Arab-Byzantine frontier’, 107, 111.Google Scholar

25 Al-Qāsim's activity is described as ribāt in Dābiq, that is in the ‘classical’ ‘Awāsim, at Balādhurī, , 171Google Scholar; Tabarī, , III, 701–9Google Scholar; cf. Canard, M., ‘La prise d'Héraclée’, Byzantion, 32, 1962, 356, 373Google Scholar. Al-Qāsim is described as ‘governor of al-Jazīra, the Thughūr and the ‘Awāsim’ at Tabarī, Hi, 712. Thābit b. Nasr is described as wāīl al-thughūr in 192 at Tabarī, III, 730, 732.

26 Ṭabarī, , III, 688Google Scholar. Reports on this expedition in Khalīfa, 735, and Ya'qūbī, Ta'rīkh, II, 512, do not use this language. This Abrahamic sacrifice may be compared with the order which Hārūn gave in 191, to destroy all the churches in the thughūr: see Tabarī, , iii, 713Google Scholar; Chronkon ad annum Christi 1234 pertinens (Louvain, 1952), II, 11Google Scholar. Compare also the destruction of churches in Jerusalem which Canard dated to A.H. 191, see ‘La prise d'Héraclée’, 347.

27 Bonner, , ‘Al-Khalīfa al-mardī’, 90–91.Google Scholar

28 The words ‘awāṣim and thaghr/thughūr never appear on coins of this district, and few coins seem to have been minted there at all from 171/788 until 278/891. See Bonner, ‘The Mint of Hārūnābād and al-Hārūniyya’; Stern, S. M., ‘The coins of Thamal and of other governors of Tarsus’, JAOS, 80, 1960, 217–25.Google Scholar

29 Bonner, M., ‘Some observations concerning the early development of jihad on the Arab- Byzantine frontier’, Studia Islamica, 75, 1992, 31.Google Scholar

30 Balādhurī, , 132, 144–52.Google Scholar

31 Balādhurī, , 171Google Scholar; Bonner, , ‘Some observations’, 17.Google Scholar

32 Fazārī, , Siyar (Beirut, 1987), 111Google Scholar; Bonner, , ‘Some observations’, 17.Google Scholar

33 Balādhurī, , 148, 166, 170, 179–80, 187–88, 197Google Scholar; Haldon, and Kennedy, , ‘The Arab-Byzantine frontier’, 112.Google Scholar

34 Abū, Yūsuf, Kitāb al-Kharāj (Būlaāq, 1302), 28–39Google Scholar. Of course this does not include the ṣawāfī, or crown lands.

35 Buldān (BGA, vol.5), 111. Ibn al-Faqīh takes his description of Armenia (pp. 290f.) from Ya'qūbī.

36 See de Goeje's note at Buldān, 323, where Yaՙqūbī also claims to have composed a work on the Byzantine Empire and its approaches.

37 Tā՚rīkh, ii, 278, 304, 461Google Scholar. To my knowledge, no other author refers to ‘awāṣim for before the reign of Rashīd.

38 Khurradādhbih, Ibn (BGA, vol. 6), 75Google Scholar; Qudāma, , 246, 251.Google Scholar

39 Qudāma, 253. Haldon and Kennedy, ‘The Arab-Byzantine frontier’, 113, find only two instances of winter raids in the century following the ‘Abbāsid revolution.

40 Qudāma, , 259.Google Scholar

41 ibid., 253–5.

42 ibid., 252.

43 Miquel, A., La géographie humaine du monde musulman jusqu'au milieu du lle siècle (Paris, 1967–88), i, 271–5.Google Scholar

44 Iṣtakhrī, (BGA, vol. 1), 2–4Google Scholar; Muqaddasī, (BGA, vol. 3), 4 (on Balkhī)Google Scholar; Miquel, , i, 80ff., 85ff., 99.Google Scholar

45 Iṣṭakhrī, , 55–75Google Scholar; Ḥawqal, Ibn (BGA, vol. 2, ed. Kramers, ), 168Google Scholar; Miquel, , II, 474.Google Scholar

46 Iṣṭakhrī, , 61.Google Scholar

47 Ibn, Ḥawqal, 179–89Google Scholar; Miquel, , ii, 473–4.Google Scholar

48 Idrīsī, , Opus geographicum (Naples, 1970–), fasc. 6, 643–53.Google Scholar

49 This is clear in the late fourth/tenth-century Persian, Ḥudūd al-ՙālam (ed. and tr. Minorsky, , London, 1937), 148–9.Google Scholar

50 Ṣubḥ al-a'shā (Cairo, 1964), iv, 131Google Scholar. Qalqashandī turns out to have been right, despite Canard's comments at EI (2nd ed.), i, 761.Google Scholar