Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:14:18.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Kuṣāṇa Trilingual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

A. D. H. Bivar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The publication by Professor Gérard Fussman of the trilingual Kuṣāṇa inscription at Dasht-i Nāvur in Afghanistan is a major event both for historical and linguistic studies. Appropriately termed by Paul Bernard ‘the Rosetta Stone of Afghanistan’, the find is impressive for its novelties, especially (in addition to Bactrian and Kharoṣṭhī) a well-preserved version in wholly unknown script and language. Yet unlike its namesake, it does not immediately solve all problems.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 333 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Documents épigraphiques kouehans’, Bulletin de l'École Frarçaise d'Extrême-Orient, LXI, 1974, 1–75.Google Scholar

2 Chicago Tribune, 20 07 1968Google Scholar (a reference I owe to the keen eye of Dr. John Hansman).

3 Henning, W. B., ‘The Bactrian inscription’, BSOAS, xxiii, 1, 1960, 51.Google Scholar

4 art. cit., 50; cf. I. Gershevitch, review of Humbach, Helmut, Die Kaniška-Inschrift von Surkh-Kotcl, BSOAS, xxvi, 1, 1963, 193.Google Scholar

5 ‘Documents épigraphiques kouchans’, p. 15, para. 1.Google Scholar

6 ibid., 12; 38.

7 ‘The Kaniṣka dating from Surkh Kotal’, BSOAS, xxvi, 3, 1963, 500–1.Google Scholar

8 Tarn, W. W., The Greeks in Bactria and India, second ed., Cambridge, 1951, 501.Google Scholar

9 JRAS, 1913, 2, p. 986 (record of oral discussion).Google Scholar

10 Konow, S., Kharoshṭhī inscriptions (Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, ii, 1), p. lxxxixGoogle Scholar, lists the five previously known occurrences of Macedonian months in the Kharoṣṭhī inscriptions.

11 e.g. at Nisa, of. D'yakonov, I. M. and Livshits, V. A., ‘Novyye nakhodki dokumentov v staroy Nise’, Peredneaziatskiy Sbornik, ii, 1966Google Scholar, English summary p. 172; in the Arsacid parchment from Avroman, and the inscription of Khwasak from Susa, cf. Henning, W. B., ‘Monuments and inscriptions of Tang-i Sarvak’, Asia Major, NS, ii, 2, 1952, 176.Google Scholar

12 ‘Documents épigraphiques kouchans’, 50.Google Scholar

13 Konow, , CII, ii, 1, pp. 58 and 62.Google Scholar

14 Wright, W. (ed. and tr.), Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles, London, 1871, ii, 146 ff.Google Scholar

15 ‘Documents épigraphiques kouchans’, 40.Google Scholar

16 Konow, , CII, ii, 1, pp. 61–2.Google Scholar

17 SirMarshall, John, Taxila, Cambridge, 1951, i, 160–1Google Scholar; ii, 839, nos. 201–21 and 841, nos. 258–60. The tentative attributions are now modified by MacDowall, D. W., ‘The rise of Gondophares the Great’Google Scholar, summary of paper in Numismatic Chronicle, 1968, Proceedings, p. xi.Google Scholar

18 Konow, , CII, ii, 1, pp. 23–9.Google Scholar

19 Tarn, W. W., The Greeks in Bactria and India, second ed., 494–502.Google Scholar

20 ‘Documents épigraphiques kouchans’, 39.Google Scholar

21 Jenkins, G. K., ‘Indo-Scythic mints’, Journal of the Numismatic Society of India, xvii, 2, 1955, 14–16.Google Scholar

22 Arrian, , Anabasis, iii, 8, 3.Google Scholar

29 Le Rider, G., ‘Monnaies de Taxila et d'Arachosie’, Revue des Études Grecques, LXXX, 1967, 341.Google Scholar

24 Konow, , CII, ii, 1, p. 48.Google Scholar

25 Bivar, A. D. H., ‘Hāriṭī and the chronology of the Kuṣāṇas’, BSOAS, xxxiii, 1, 1970, 18–19.Google Scholar