^{page 33 note 1} It should be distinguished from the Valiya Tamburān's Malayalam-Sanskrit work of the same name (published in the Trivandrum collection of 1858 and again in the Tellicherry edition of M. Rāmuṇṇi Vāriyar in 1895), as well as from Viśvanātha's Sāugandhikâharaṇa (in Kāvyamālā, No. 74). Their common source is, of course, Mahābhārata, Vana-p°. cxlvi–clvi.

^{page 35 note 1} I am not, however, convinced that the Trivandrum Svapnavāsavadattam ia an adaptation of the original play of that name by Bhāsa. Mere coincidence of name in the case of works dealing with popular themes proves nothing: we know three Kumārasambhavas, besides the two Kalyāṇasāugandhikas and the Sāugandhikâharaṇa.

^{page 35 note 2} A omits all the words from Nāndyantē to the second Sūtradhāraḥ.

^{page 36 note 1} A° iyyammi.

^{page 36 note 2} Omitted in B; ayyamissāṇam A.

^{page 36 note 3} Kārtyāyanī° B, as in the Bālacarita and Subhadrādhanaṃjaya, etc.

^{page 36 note 4} Pandit Veṅkaṭarāma Ṡarmā has reported to me the reading (or emendation?) upasēvitavāggurur naḥ.

^{page 36 note 5} A° aṃa; the anusvāra or small circle on top is used to denote a doubling of the consonant (cf. Pischel, , Gramm, d. Pktspr., § 193Google Scholar, and Epigr. Ind., xvi, p. 346, n. 2Google Scholar), and hence is applied even to a, which in southern pronunciation often has a glide y prefixed to it. The same spelling is used in ayyamissāṇaṃ further on in the same sentence.

^{page 36 note 6} Omitted in B.

^{page 36 note 7} A° -dōṣāt.

^{page 36 note 8} A° datvā.

^{page 37 note 1} A omits all the words from Bhīma, two lines before, to Sūtradhāraḥ.

^{page 37 note 2} B atyukṣya.

^{page 37 note 3} B spanditadurbalaṃ.

^{page 37 note 4} A° asalcṛt.

^{page 37 note 5} B bhujābhyām.

^{page 37 note 6} Ettiammattō abhidō B.

^{page 37 note 7} B ṇāma ēsā.

^{page 37 note 8} Omit. B.

^{page 37 note 9} B aparāṇi cēṣṭitāni.

^{page 37 note 10} A° -pradīpāḥ.

^{page 37 note 11} A° śatruchadmalcṣapitavimalaśrĩryaśōmãnabhōgāḥ.

^{page 37 note 12} B parikramyôrdhvam avalōkya.

^{page 38 note 1} B niṣkrāntaḥ sakalatras tāpasaḥ.

^{page 38 note 2} A° nāṭayan.

^{page 38 note 3} A° trāsayan.

^{page 38 note 4} B apparently °nipātanakham.

^{page 38 note 5} B °jhaṣakāir.

^{page 38 note 6} B inserts the stage-direction smṛtvā before kim.

^{page 38 note 7} Omit. B.

^{page 39 note 1} A° -gaṇāḥ.

^{page 39 note 2} A° āgatā.

^{page 39 note 3} So B; A saṃrakṣyantē.

^{page 39 note 4} B idānīm avikalam.

^{page 39 note 5} B Alakêśvarasya svāminaḥ.

^{page 39 note 6} B -sañcayahṛtâyuṣi.

^{page 39 note 7} A° -dēhaḥ.

^{page 39 note 8} A° -vrajāiḥ.

^{page 40 note 1} B manuṣyā rākṣasān haniṣyanti.

^{page 40 note 2} A° ēvaṃ.

^{page 40 note 3} A° kṣaṇāt.

^{page 40 note 4} So A°, which represents the local pronunciation. Kirmīra is usual in the North; Kimmīra is the Tamil form.

^{page 40 note 5} So A°, apparently to be corrected to maṃ gaṇha i niṇā duvviṇīdēṇa, māru'a-hadaēṇa, paricīamāṇaṃ bhōiṇiṃ viä ṇāavēriṇā [i.e. bhōginīm iva nāgavāiriṇā] jāva ēsō ṇa maṃ mārēi. On the wind called parāvaha, see Mahābhār, ., Śānti-p°. cccxxviii, 48 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 41 note 1} A° gṛhītum.

^{page 41 note 2} B idam atidūratvād, which ig perhaps the better reading.

^{page 41 note 3} Written in A° peṃkha; see above, p. 36, n. 5.

^{page 41 note 4} B gumhāyō.

^{page 41 note 5} B ṇāha ammō savvaṃ mahattaṃ.

^{page 41 note 6} A° savvuttam.

^{page 41 note 7} B abhịpraṇamya.

^{page 41 note 8} B adds the stage-direction praṇamya before Namō.

^{page 42 note 1} A° -bandha-; see above, p. 36, n. 5.

^{page 42 note 2} Aīchī.

^{page 42 note 3} A° -gaṇāiḥ.

^{page 42 note 4} B -sajaḷajaḷaharatthaṇida-.

^{page 42 note 5} So A°; mā for maṃ is contrary to the known rules (Pischel, , Gr. d. Pktspr., § 418Google Scholar), but until the laws of the Southern School of Prakrit are better known it seems hazardous to alter it.

^{page 42 note 6} A nikhātaṃ, … tō, with a query after the tō; B nikhātaṃ … tāu.

^{page 42 note 7} B -talam idam.

^{page 42 note 8} So A and B, a Vedic form (Skt. anayōr).

^{page 42 note 9} So B; A -purassarayōḥ.

^{page 42 note 10} B prabhāvântaritāu.

^{page 42 note 11} A° -dantachada-.

^{page 42 note 12} A° udayāis.

^{page 42 note 13} B avaśam ayam.

^{page 43 note 1} B kiñcid iha.

^{page 43 note 2} A° vitānāiḥ.

^{page 43 note 3} B aruṇap°.

^{page 43 note 4} B bhrukuṭiyuga … daṃṣṭrâṃśulakṣmīḥ.

^{page 43 note 5} B praviśati sakrōdhō.

^{page 43 note 6} B -carvaṇakī°.

^{page 43 note 7} B dinakṛtâpy.

^{page 43 note 8} A° bhayät.

^{page 44 note 1} A° hi.

^{page 44 note 2} B garvadōṣamātram.

^{page 44 note 3} After this speech B inserts: Bhīmah. Apêhi. Hanumān. Kiṃ na śṛṇōṣi jaradvānarō'smîti? Bhīmaḥ (anākarṇya). Āḥ apagaccha. Ēvam idānīṃ kariṣyē.

^{page 44 note 4} A° cchandataḥ.

^{page 44 note 5} So B; utkampitum A.

^{page 44 note 6} B nivārayiṣyatē.

^{page 44 note 7} B niyuddhaṃ.

^{page 45 note 1} A° jyēṣṭhakaniṣṭhayōḥ.

^{page 45 note 2} B adds Bhīmō'ham asmi.

^{page 45 note 3} B vatsa pariṣvajasva.

^{page 45 note 4} A and B in both cases āsva, which can be defended.

^{page 45 note 5} B sahacarī.

^{page 45 note 6} A and B mahāsatvaḥ.

^{page 45 note 7} A and B mahāsatva.

^{page 45 note 8} B Ubhāu.

^{page 45 note 9} Omit. B.

^{page 45 note 10} Grammatical person!

^{page 46 note 1} A° Hanumann.

^{page 46 note 2} A° dṛśâvakurvatō.

^{page 46 note 3} B kim āha.

^{page 46 note 4} A° yatvayâham.

^{page 46 note 5} A° āsraṃ.

^{page 46 note 6} B kṛtântas tvaṃ.

^{page 46 note 7} A° dhīraḥ.

^{page 46 note 8} This sentence seems to want a negative.

^{page 46 note 9} B prakṛtisthō.

^{page 46 note 10} So B; A nâtyāyatas, an error perhaps due to Dravidian pronunciation (cf. Tamil mādam = Skt. māsa, etc.).

^{page 46 note 11} A° vyatîtâmbudhiḥ.

^{page 47 note 1} After this sentence the text of B begins to expand so as to include a further episode. See Appendix.

^{page 47 note 2} B yāvad ādiṣṭham anuṣṭhitam.

^{page 47 note 3} A adhikṛtya, ēṣa.

^{page 47 note 4} So A and B.

^{page 47 note 5} B Ēvam ēva kariṣyē.

^{page 47 note 6} A nigghōṣṭha-, B nirgghōṣṭha-. The line seems to be a reminiscence of Mahābhār. Drōṇa-p., lxxvii, 4, śuṣkâśanyaś ca niṣṗētuḥ sanirghātāḥ, savidyutaḥ; then nirghuṣṭx will correspond to sanirghāta, though I can quote no authority for the compound verb except nirghōṣa (cf. Nalôp., xii, 3Google Scholar, parisaṃghuṣṭa).

^{page 47 note 7} A sannôjvalanaprakāśān, B sannôjvalanaprakāśam.

^{page 47 note 8} A 'bhavaṃ, with avagraha; B bhayaṃ.

^{page 47 note 9} A and B kṣapayatāṃ.

^{page 48 note 1} B unmetrically nṛpaḥ sō'yam.

^{page 48 note 2} Read Nanv.

^{page 48 note 3} Read sañjātaḥ.

^{page 48 note 4} Read sakhē.

^{page 48 note 5} Read ādiṣṭam.

^{page 48 note 6} Grammar!

^{page 48 note 7} Read Ubhāu.

^{page 49 note 1} Spelt aṃō; cf. above, p. 36, n. 5.

^{page 49 note 2} Read uvavisadu.

^{page 49 note 3} Āssva would be better spelling.

^{page 49 note 4} Corrupt: read teḷḷokka- (Pischel, , Gr. d. Pktspr., § 196).Google Scholar

^{page 49 note 5} Ayē …. vâinam atisāhasān?

^{page 49 note 6} Apparently for aṇṇō mē maṇōrahō āsi.

^{page 49 note 7} Perhaps correct (Skt. satyakam): cf. Pischel, , Pkt., § 230Google Scholar. But more probably saccaṃ ṇaṃ or saccagaṃ.

^{page 49 note 8} Read ayyō.

^{page 49 note 9} Read ṇivuttasamaāṇaṃ ṇāhānaṃ dēvâsurasaṃgāmasamō.

^{page 49 note 10} Read -dassaṇaṃ ti ayyō vivādaṃ … evvaṃ evva kidaṃ.

^{page 49 note 11} Perhaps to be corrected to Vididō ayya: evvaṃ, ayyadassaṇaṃ uvahidāe (or uvaadāe?) antiē maē savvaṃ Ṇāradanuhēṇa vivuhabhavaṇaṃ (i.e. vibudhabhavanaṃ) gaē Ajjuṇē paāsidaṃ.

^{page 49 note 12} Atyāṅgirasaṃ?

^{page 49 note 13} Perhaps Ciraṃ ayyō rakhkhidavvō; see above, p. 36, n. 5.

^{page 50 note 1} Read ayyassa … uggappaṇādēhiṃ saṃchōhēdavvō.

^{page 50 note 2} See notes on verse 46 above.

^{page 50 note 3} Sic!

^{page 50 note 4} Perhaps āhartur abhyāśagā.

^{page 50 note 5} Perhaps bhūtahitāya.

^{page 50 note 6} Read aṇuggahidamhi.

^{page 50 note 7} Probably guhyakêśam.

^{page 50 note 8} Read bhavaṃ kṣapayatān, and see notes on verse 48 above, pp. 47–8.