No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
In another place I have suggested that some of the works ascribed to Haribhadra contradict each other so sharply on matters of doctrine and usage that it is scarcely credible that they can have been written by the same author.
1 See Jaina yoga,4–7.Google Scholar
2 See ‘Haribhadra Sūri kā samaya-nirṇaya’, Jaina Sāhitya Saṃñodhaka, 1, 1919, 38–58.Google Scholar
3 Ṣoḍaśaka vi.15, deyaṃ (se. Jina-bhavanaṃ) tu na sādhubhyas tiṢṭhanti yathā ca te tathā kāryam.
4 See Jaina yoga, 5.Google Scholar
5 It must not be forgotten that the commentary on the Pañca-vastu is certainly the work of Yākinī-putra and any talk of a svopajña-ṭīkā is therefore erroneous.
6 śrāvaka-dharma-pañcāśka-cūrṇī, Bombay, 1952 (p. 2).Google Scholar
7 See Kapadia's, H. R. edition of the Anekānta-jaya-patākā, Vol. II, p. XVIII.Google Scholar The introductions to the two volumes of this work (Baroda, 1940–1948) contain, with much other information, a full bibliography to date, of books and articles touching on the subject of Haribhadra.Google Scholar
8 Specimen of a Jaina onomastikon, Leipzig, 1892, 8.Google Scholar
9 See Jaina yoga, 257.Google Scholar
10 In the notes to his edition of this text.
11 op. cit., Vol. II, pp. xxxvii-xxxviii.
12 The references are to the pages, and, where applicable, the lines, of Jacobi'sedition, for whieh the abbreviation SK will be used.
13 Jacobi's inferenees (SKintroduction, p. x) on this point are different frora mine.
14 ‘Üer das Prakrit in der Erzählungsliteratur der Jainas’, Rivista degli Studi Orientali, II, 1908–1909, 233: ' Es ist nun beachtenswert, dass alle jene beanstandeten Formen ebenfalls in Haribhadra's Samarādityakathā gebräuchlich sind, und zwar inhäherem Grade als in den “Ausgew. Erzählungen in Mâhârâshṭri”, obschon Devendra, der Verfasser der letzteren, drei Jahrhunderte jünger als Haribhadra ist. Das Alter allein bedingt also nicht die Sprachreinheit. Bei Haribhadra … finden sich die oben hervorgehobenen Sanskritismen und Entlehnungen aus der Śaurasenī hauptsachlich in der Prosa. Sie sind also nur für diese characteristisch und fehlen in den metrischen Teilen entweder gänzlich oder kommen doch nur sehr sporadisch vor'.Google Scholar
15 op. cit., Vol. II, p. xlvii (footnote).
16 This will be referred to as the MPCH and the earlier, anonymous Maṇipati-caritra as the MPC.
17 ‘Ācārya Haribhadra Sūri aur unkī Samaramiyaṅgakahā’, in Premi abhinandan granth, 424.
18 It is perhaps worth recalling that there is a minor episode in the SK (658–60) which tells the story of a prince Samarāmṛgāṅka.