Article contents
The dream of the king and the holy war against the Dutch: The kôteubah of the Acehnese epic, Hikayat Prang Gômpeuni
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
Extract
When the Aceh War finally broke out in 1873 it did not come as a surprise to most contemporaries. In colonial historiography Aceh, a ‘nest of pirates’, according to the Dutch, had obviously precipitated the war by its ‘treason’ in turning to Turkey, America and other foreign powers for support against the Dutch. The discussions with the American consul in Singapore early in 1873 on a possible Acehnese-American treaty constituted a casus belli in the eyes of the Dutch.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 298 - 308
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1998
References
REFERENCES
Amshoff, Maria Catharina Hilje. 1929. Goudkruintje: een Atjèhsche roman met vertolking en toelichling. Leiden: Vros.Google Scholar
Blok, E. 1885. ‘Sjair Prang Atjeh naar een te Singapoera (?) gelithographeerden Maleischen tekst in het Hollandsch vertaald’, Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 30: 568–95.Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. 1991. Sumatran politics and poetics: Gayo history, 1900–1989. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brakel, L. F.. 1975. The Hikayat Muhammad Hanqfiyyah: a medieval Muslim-Malay romance. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Brakel, L. F. 1977. The story of Muhammad Hanafiyyah: a medieval Muslim romance translated from the Malay. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Damsté, H. T. 1928. ‘Hikajat Prang Sabi’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 84: 545–609.Google Scholar
Derks, Wilhelmus Anna Gerardus. 1994. ‘The feast of storytelling: on Malay oral tradition.’ Leiden: Diss. University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Djajadiningrat, R. A. Hoesein. 1934. Atjèhsch-Nederlandsch woordenboek. 2 vols. Batavia: Landsdrukkerij.Google Scholar
Drewes, G. W. J. 1980. Two Achehnese poems: Hikajat Ranto and Hikajat Teungku die Meuké'. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Abdullah, Imran Teuku. 1991. Hikayat Meukuta Alam. Suntingan teks dan terjemahan beserta telaah struktur dan resepsi. Jakarta: Intermasa.Google Scholar
Iskandar, T. 1986. ‘The Hikayat Prang Geudông’, in Grijns, C. D. and Robson, S. O. (ed.), Cultural contact and textual interpretation. Dordrecht-Cinnaminson: Foris Publications, 94–120.Google Scholar
Koch, Klaus.1969. The growth of the biblical tradition: the form-critical method. London: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Kuitenbrouwer, M. 1985. Nederland en de opkomst van het moderne imperialisme: Kolonialisme en buitenlandse politiek 1870–1902. Amsterdam-Dieren: De Bataafsche Leeuw.Google Scholar
Reid, A. 1969. The contest for North Sumatra: Atjeh, the Netherlands and Britain, 1858–1898. London, etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, M. C. 1981. A history of modern Indonesia, c. 1300 to the present. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Snouck Hurgronje, C. 1894. De Atjehers. Deel 2. Batavia: Landsdrukkerij; Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sulastin, Sutrisno. 1983. Hikayat Hang Tuah: analisa struktur dan fungsi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, P. 1994. Catalogue of Acehnese manuscripts in the library of Leiden University and other collections outside Aceh. Leiden: Leiden University Library.Google Scholar
Wieringa, Edwin. 1997. ‘The Kaba Zamzami jo Mariaini: continuity, adaptation and change in Minangkabau oral storytelling’, Indonesia and the Malay World, 73: 235–51.Google Scholar
Woods, F. H. 1964. ‘Deluge’, in (ed.) Hastings, James, Encyclopaedia of religion and ethics. Vol. v. (Edinburgh:T. & T. Clark), 545–57.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by