Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:38:01.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Customary khul' as reflected in the sijill of the Libyan sharĪ a; courts1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Aharon Layish
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Khul’, according to its shar ī definition, is a wife's ‘redemption of herself’ from the marriage tie, with the husband's consent, by the use of the word khul’, or a verb derived from it, in return for consideration. The husband, not the wife, dissolves the marriage tie; he must be legally competent to divorce the wife, and the wife must be legally competent to enter into a contractual divorce agreement for consideration (Anderson, 1970: 367). She is a party to the proceedings for divorce by shar’ī khul’, just as she is a party to the marriage contract. She generally compensates the husband by returning the dower (which is her property under the sharī'a), wholly or in part, in exchange for her freedom. This is the picture emerging from the sijill and confirmed by research elsewhere.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , October 1988 , pp. 428 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Secondary Sources

Anderson, J. N. D. 1970. Islamic law in Africa. New impression. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Berque, J. ‘‘Amal’, El (2nd ed.), 427 f.Google Scholar
Bousquet, G.-H. [1945.] ‘Islamic law and customary law in French North Africa.’ A Special University Lecture delivered in the University of London, London.Google Scholar
Bousquet, G.-H. 1950. Justice francaise et coutumes kabiles. Alger: Imprimerie Nord-Africaine, S. Crescenzo.Google Scholar
Colucci, M. 1927. ‘II Diritto consuetudinario delle tribu della Cirenaica’. Rhista Coloniale, Vol. 22: 24–37.Google Scholar
Colucci, M. 1932. ‘II Diritto consuetudinario della Cirenaica’, Revista Giuridica del Medio ed Estremo Oriente Giuslizia Coloniale, Vol. x, Fasc 1–2: 38–50.Google Scholar
Coulson, N. J. 1964. A history of Islamic law. (Islamic Surveys, 2.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Layish, A. 1975. Women and Islamic law in a non-Muslim state: a study based on the decisions of the sharī'a courts in Israel. New York and Jerusalem: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Layish, A. 1987. ‘Saudi Arabian legal reform as a mechanism to moderate WahhĀbĪ doctrine’, JAOS, 107/2: 279–92.Google Scholar
Layish, A. (In preparation.) Bedouin of the Judaean Desert: Islamization of tribal society: a study based on legal documents of arbitrators and sharī'a courts.Google Scholar
Layish, A. (In preparation.) Divorce in the Libyan family: a study based on the sijill of the shaī'a courts of AjdĀbiya and Kufra.Google Scholar
Layish, A. and Shmueli, A. 1979. ‘Custom and sharī'a in the Bedouin family according to legal documents from the Judaean Desert’, BSOAS, XLII, 1: 29–45.Google Scholar
Linant de Bellefonds, Y. 1965. Traité de droit musulman comparé. Vol. 2. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Mayer, Ann. 1978. ‘Developments in the law of marriage and divorce in Libya since the 1969 revolution’, Journal of African Law, 22/1: 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliot, L. 1953. Introduction à I'étude du droit musulman. Paris: Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
Mohsen, Safia, K. 1970. ‘Aspects of the legal status of women among Awlad ‘Ali’, in Sweet, Louise, E. (ed.), People and cultures of the Middle East, I. Garden City, NY.: Natural History Press: 220–33.Google Scholar
Mohsen, Safia, K. 1975. Conflict and law among Awlad ‘Ali of the Western Desert. Cairo: National Center for Social and Criminological Research.Google Scholar
Peters, E. L. 1965. ‘Aspects of the family among the Bedouin of Cyrenaica’, in Nimkoff, M. F. (ed.), Comparative family systems. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin: 121–46.Google Scholar
Obermayer, G. J. 1968. Structure and authority in a Bedouin tribe: the ‘Aishaibat of the Western Desert of Egypt. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University (University Microfilms).Google Scholar
Oweidi, Ahmad Saleh, Suleiman. 1982. Bedouin justice in Jordan: the customary legal system of the tribes and its integration into the framework of state policy from 1921 onwards. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Schacht, J. 1966. An introduction to Islamic law. Second impression. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Google Scholar
Stern, Gertrude. 1939. Marriage in early Islam. London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. H. (Forthcoming.) A Bedouin tribe and its law.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. H. and Blanc, H. (Forthcoming.) Cases and texts in Sinai Bedouin law.Google Scholar