Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-16T19:35:19.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The affinities of Kuy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

H. L. Shorto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The appearance of substantial dictionaries of Kuy and Bruu, both compiled by native speakers under the auspices of the Indigenous Languages of Thailand Research Project (Sriwises, 1978; Thongkum and Puengpa, 1980), allows us to observe a significant measure of agreement between the lexicons of these two Mon-Khmer languages. There is a good deal of similarity also between their phonological systems, notably in respect of the vowels.

Type
Notes and Communications
Information
Bulletin of SOAS , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , October 1982 , pp. 574 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benjamin, G. 1976. ‘Austroasiatie subgroupings and prehistory in the Malay Peninsula’, in Jenner, P. N., and others (ed.), Austroasiatic studies. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 37–128.Google Scholar
Cabaton, A. 1905. ‘Dix dialectes indochinois recueillis par Prosper Odend'hal’, JA, Xe sér., v, 265–344.Google Scholar
Cadiére, L. 1940. ‘Note sur les Moī du Quâng-tri’, IIEH, III, 1, 101–7.Google Scholar
Costello, N. A. 1971. Katu vocabulary. Saigon: Bộ Giáo-d໱c.Google Scholar
Ferlus, M. 1972. ‘Notes sur les dialectes austroasiens du Sud Laos’, ASEMI, III, 2, 35–49.Google Scholar
Fraisse, A. 1950. ‘Les tribus Sek et Kha de la province de Cammon (Laos)’, BSEIC, N.S. XXXV, 333–48.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, A. G. 1965. ‘Les mutations consonantiques des occlusives initiales en Mon-Khmer’, BSLP, LX, 1, 160–72. [= Haudricourt, 1972, 303–16.]Google Scholar
Haudricourt, A. G. 1972. Problémes de phonologie diachronique. (Langues et civilisations à tradition orale, 1.) Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Macey, P. 1905. ‘fitude ethnographique sur diverses tribus ⃛habitant les provinces des Hua-phan[s] Ha-tang-hoc et du Cammon, au Laos’, Int. Orient. Cong., xrv, pt. 1, 5e section, 3–63.Google Scholar
Maspero, H. 1929. ‘Langues’, in Maspero, G. (ed.), Un empire colonial francais: I'lndochine. Paris, Bruxelles. G. van Oest, I, 63'82.Google Scholar
Pinnow, H. J. 1959. Verauch einer historischen Lautlehre der Kharia-Sprache. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sriwises, , Prasert, . 1978. Kui (Suai)-Thai-English dictionary. [Bangkok]: Chulalongkorn University Language Institute15Google Scholar
Thomas, D. D. 1966. ‘Mon-Khmer subgroupings in Vietnam’, in Zide, N. H. (ed.), Studies in comparative Austroasiatic linguistics. The Hague, etc.: Mouton, 194–202.Google Scholar
Thongkum, Theraphan L., and Puengpa, , See. 1980. A Bruu-Thai-English dictionary. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn UniversityGoogle Scholar