Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:38:57.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching formulation skills—a new approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

J. L. Herzberg  and
R. Farmer
J. L. Herzberg
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital, London W2
R. Farmer
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital, London W2
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , July 1985 , pp. 140
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1985

References

1 Royal College of Psychiatrists (1983) Membership Examination: Clinical and Oral Examinations—Guidance to Candidates. (Leaflet circulated from the College's Examinations Office).Google Scholar
2 Hollyman, J. A. & Hemsi, L. (1983) What do psychiatrists understand by formulation? A survey of clinicians in a group of hospitals in London. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 7, 140–143.Google Scholar
3 Hollyman, J. A. & Hemsi, L. (1983) What do the examiners understand by formulation? A survey of the members of the College's Board of Examiners. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 7, 165–166.Google Scholar
4 Greenberg, M., Szmukler, G. & Tantam, D. (1982) Guidelines on formulation (Correspondence). Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 6, 160–162.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.