Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:12:02.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The South Camden Schizophrenia Survey: An experience of community-based research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Chris Pantelis ,
Jason Taylor  and
Patrick Campbell
Chris Pantelis
Affiliation:
Royal Free & Friern Hospitals
Jason Taylor
Affiliation:
Royal Free & Friern Hospitals
Patrick Campbell
Affiliation:
Friern & University College Hospitals, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The South Camden Schizophrenia Survey was started in 1985 with Regional Funding through the Locally Organised Research Scheme. Its overall aim is to explore the disabilities and needs of those individuals recognised by the services within an inner-city area as suffering from schizophrenia. The survey has also been the first step towards setting up a computerised case monitoring system, named ‘Safety Net’, which is being developed as a means of keeping track of the needs and progress of these vulnerable individuals. This enterprise will develop a community-wide perspective directed at targetting the deployment of services to those most in need. This article gives a preliminary account of the progress so far and highlights our experience of carrying out research within the community.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , March 1988 , pp. 98 - 101
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988

References

1 Wing, J. & Hailey, A. M. (1972) Principles of evaluation. In Evaluating a Community Psychiatric Service. The Camberwell Register 1964–1971. Google Scholar
2 Jarman, B. (1983) Identification of underprivileged areas. British Medical Journal, 286, 1705–1708.Google Scholar
3 Szmukler, G. I. et al (1981) Compulsory admissions in a London Borough: I & II. Psychological Medicine, 11, 825–838.Google Scholar
4 Ebringer, L. & Christie-Brown, J. R. W. (1980) Social deprivation amongst short-stay patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 46–52.Google Scholar
5 Feighner, J. P., Rubins, E., Guze, S., Woodruff, R. A., Winokur, G. & Munoz, R. (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Krawiecka, M., Goldberg, D. & Vaughn, M. (1977) A standardised psychiatric assessment scale for rating chronic psychotic patients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 55, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Wykes, T. & Sturt, E. (1986) The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: An assessment of the reliability and validity of the Social Behaviour Schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1–12.Google Scholar
8 McCreadie, R. G. (1982) The Nithsdale Schizophrenia Survey: I. Psychiatric and social handicaps. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 582–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Taylor, J. & Pantelis, C. (1987) Developing a microprocessor based case register, Abstract of Proceedings of the Conference on Computers in Psychiatry and Psychology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 5–6.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.