Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T20:38:02.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Satisfactory Science of Mind, and the Connection Between Mind Science and Brain Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter O'Hara
Peter O'Hara*
Affiliation:
St. Loman's Hospital, Dublin 20
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this article, ‘mind science’ refers to any knowledge derived from the study of behaviour, in which I include self-reports of mental states. ‘Brain science’ refers to anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry. Psychiatrists have contact with both types of science, especially in helping to construct therapies. Some choose help more from the one or the other, but even those who make use of both rarely see any connection between the two sciences. There are also difficulties over what is truly scientific in the ‘mind science’ sector. This article looks at these two problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 9 , Issue 10 , October 1985 , pp. 195 - 196
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1985

References

1 Hofstadter, D. R. (1979) Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.