Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:02:36.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Maudsley Daily Living Programme

A controlled cost-effectiveness study of community-based versus standard in-patient care of serious mental illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Isaac Marks ,
Joe Connolly  and
Mattijs Muijen
Isaac Marks
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5
Mattijs Muijen
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper outlines a three-year controlled study, funded by the Department of Health and Social Security, which started at the Maudsley Hospital in October 1987. The research will compare seriously mentally ill patients maintained outside hospital on the daily living programme (DLP) with standard hospital-based care, and devise a multi-disciplinary training course in DLP for mental health care providers. It will be the first UK attempt at controlled replication of successful controlled studies from North America and Australia, and the first anywhere to devise systematic training in the approach.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 22 - 24
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988

References

1 Grad, J. & Sainsbury, P. (1968) The effects that patients have on their families in a community care and control psychiatric service: a 2-year follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 265–268.Google Scholar
2 Stein, L. I. & Test, M. A. (1980) Alternative to mental hospital treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392–405.Google Scholar
3 Fenton, F. R., Tessier, L., Struening, E. L., Smith, F. A. & Benoit, C. (1982) Home and Hospital Psychiatric Treatment. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
4 Hoult, J., Rosen, A. & Reynolds, I. (1984) Community orientated treatment compared to psychiatric hospital orientated treatment. Social Science and Medicine, 18, 1005–1010.Google Scholar
5 Test, M. A., Knoedler, W. H. & Allness, D. J. (1985) The long-term treatment of young schizophrenics in a community support program. In The Training in Community Living Model: A Decade of Experience. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26 (Eds Stein, L. I. & Test, M. A.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
6 Platt, S. D., Knights, A. C. & Hirsch, S. R. (1980) Caution and conservatism in the use of a psychiatric day hospital: Evidence from a research project that failed. Psychiatry Research, 3, 123–132.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.