Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:41:49.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asylum for the mentally ill in historical perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

William Li Parry-Jones
William Li Parry-Jones*
Affiliation:
Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At a time of increasing emphasis on community care for the mentally ill and of mounting concern about its adequacy, questions arise about the necessity for asylum and its optional provision. The term ‘asylum’ was first used in relation to institutions for the insane in the late 18th century and it became the ‘in’ word in 19th century lunacy terminology. It took over from ‘madhouse’, which a contemporary observer called “an opprobious epithet, only suited to the horrible ideas formerly deservedly associated with such places”. In turn, it was superseded officially by ‘mental hospital’ under the 1930 Mental Treatment Act, in an attempt to jettison the negative connotations of ‘lunatic asylum’, and to suggest a parallel curative function with general hospitals.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 12 , Issue 10 , October 1988 , pp. 407 - 410
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1988

References

1. Conolly, E. T. (1858) Suggestions for the Amendment of the Laws relating to Private Lunatic Asylums. London: Shaw & Sons, 4–5.Google Scholar
2. Parry-Jones, W. Ll. (1972) The Trade in Lunacy. A Study of Private Madhouses in England in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
3. Battie, W. (1758) A Treatise on Madness. London: Whiston & White, 93.Google Scholar
4. Foucault, M. (1967) Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
5. Scull, A. (1979) Museums of Madness: The Social Organization of Insanity in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
6. Doerner, K. (1981) Madness and the Bourgeoisie: A Social History of Insanity and Psychiatry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
7. Digby, A. (1985) Madness, Morality and Medicine: A Study of the York Retreat 1796–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
8. Tuke, S. (1846) Review of the Early History of the Retreat, York. 10.Google Scholar
9. Scull, , op.cit., 121.Google Scholar
10. Parry-Jones, W. Ll. (1981) The model of the Geel Lunatic Colony and its influence on the nineteenth-century asylum system in Britain. In Madhouses, Mad-Doctors, and Madmen: The Social History of Psychiatry in the Victorian Era (ed. Scull, A.). London: Athlone.Google Scholar
11. Bucknill, J. C. (1860) Annual reports of lunatic asylums. Journal of Mental Science, 6, 511.Google Scholar
12. Gralnick, A. (1986) The asylum snare. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 37, 433.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.