No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Accountability and delegation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 11 , Issue 10 , October 1987 , pp. 345 - 346
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1987
References
1
Kennedy, P. (1986) Are consultants accountable?
British Medical Journal, 293, 1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2
Drife, J. L. (1987) Consultant accountability. British Medical Journal, 294, 789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3
Hollis, P. (1987) Accountability and delegation–doctors and administrators. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 11, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Rawnsley, K. (1984) The future of the consultant in psychiatry: A report to the College. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 8, 122–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1986) Medical care of long-stay patients in psychiatric wards. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 10, 208.Google Scholar
6
The Royal College of Psychiatrists (1987) The Mental Health Act 1983 Draft Code of Practice, Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 11, 63–67.Google Scholar
7
General Medical Council (1987) Professional Conduct and Discipline: Fitness to Practise.
London: General Medical Council.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.