Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:15:09.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific Literature and the Classification of the Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

H. D. Anthony
Get access

Extract

The word “classification” is used here in its sense of “the result of classifying” rather than the action of so doing. Since the resulting classification has special reference to the subject-matter of science as a whole, it is natural to turn to the scientific literature of various periods for an indication of how this classification has been developed. For sake of comparison, reference may be made to one of the modern systems of library classification. In the Dewey Decimal System the numbers 550 to 559 are allotted to Geology and 560 to 569 to Palaeontology. By placing numbers to the right of the decimal point, further sub-divisions may be made, for example, 560·942 is classed as Palaeon-tology of England. Thus a number is available for every reasonable demand of classification. The present purpose is to trace the natural evolution of the various branches of science, in contrast to the mechanical process of providing a classification of scientific literature for ease of reference. An example may make this distinction clearer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the British Society for the History of Science , Volume 2 , Issue 19 , June 1958 , pp. 89 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lang, W. D., Spath, L. F., Cox, L. R. and Muir-Wood, H. M., 1928. The Belemnite Marls of Charmouth, a Series in the Lias of the Dorset Coast.Google Scholar

2 Anthony, H. D., “Scientific Books of the Eighteenth Century and the Emergence of Modern Science”. Proc. Roy. Instn., (1959). 37, no. 167, 334.Google Scholar

3 Singer, C., Technology and History, L. T. Hobhouse Memorial Trust Lecture No. 21, (1952) p. 13.Google Scholar

4 Moyle, W., Works, ed. Sergeant (1726), Vol. 1, p. 422.Google Scholar

6 Job of Edessa, Book of Treasures tr. A. Mingana (1935), Prefatory Note, p. V.Google Scholar

7 Idem p. 1. Author's Preface.

8 Crombie, A. C., Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science 1100–1700, (1953).Google Scholar

8 Moody, J. M. I., Journal of the History of Ideas 1951, 12. 399.Google Scholar

9 Durand, D. B., Speculum, 1941, 16, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Crombie, A. C., op. cit. p. 14.Google Scholar

11 Anthony, H. D., op. cit. p. 340.Google Scholar

12 von Humboldt, A., Cosmos (1847), Preface, p. XVIII.Google Scholar

13 Eddington, A. S., Space, Time and Gravitation (1920), p. 201.Google Scholar