Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:44:10.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Versions of Immobility: The Contemporary American Writer and the Jewish Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2011

Get access

Extract

The “Jewishness” of recent American fiction has already been well explored. But discussion of the work of Jewish writers tends to be retrospective: it leads back to the shtetl and the shlemiel without considering how “Americanised” Jewish forms and themes have become. Clearly, recent authors such as Bernard Malamud, Philip Roth and Saul Bellow are indebted to a fund of “Jewish experience”. But their novels are “American”, far more concerned with twentieth-century urban problems than with the enclosed life of the traditional Jewish community. This essay therefore attempts to assess how far “Jewish” localised material has been translated into specifically “American” terms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for American Studies 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Singer, I.B., “Gimpel The Fool”, reprinted in A Treasury of Yiddish Stories ed. by Irving, Howe and Eliezer, Greenberg, London 1955 & 1959 (Andre Deutsch).Google Scholar
2. Saul Bellow quoted by Tony, Tanner, “Saul Bellow: The Flight From Monologue”, Encounter Vol. XXIV Nos. 2, February 1965, p. 68.Google Scholar
3. Russian Street Song, quoted by Rischin in The Promised City, translated from original in Schlesinger, Russland in XX. Jahrhundert, pp. 140–141.Google Scholar
4. I.B. Singer, “The Little Shoemakers”, reprinted in A Treasury of Yiddish Stories (op. cit.).Google Scholar
5.Rischin, Moses, The Promised City, Harvard U. P. 1962, p. 33.Google Scholar
6. Rischin, op. cit., p. 270, p. 81.Google Scholar
7.Kazin, Alfred, A Walker in the City, N. Y. 1951, London 1952 (Victor Gollancz), p. 48.Google Scholar
8. Rischin, op. cit., pp. 258–263.Google Scholar
9.Frank, Waldo, “Under the Dome” reprinted in Yisröel: The First Jewish Omnibus, ed. Joseph, Leftwich, London 1933 (John Heritage) pp. 267278.Google Scholar
10. Howe and Greenberg op. cit. p. 69.Google Scholar
11. Howe and Greenberg op. cit. p. 48.Google Scholar
12. Howe and Greenberg op. cit. p. 47, quote Maurice Samuel: Maurice Samuel has discussed the way Hebrew phrases form a sacred canopy over the profane action of Yiddish writing and sometimes become twisted into a backdrop of complex irony. “The fusion of the secular and sacred in Yiddish”, he writes, “makes possible a charming transition from the jocular to the solemn and back again. Well worn quotations from sacred texts mingle easily with colloquialisms, and dignified passages jostle popular interjections without taking or giving offence. There is about it all a suggestion of an original bazaar.Google Scholar
13.Yisröel: The First Jewish OmnibusGoogle Scholar
14.West, Nathanael, Miss Lonelyhearts, N.Y. 1933, reprinted in The Complete Works of Nathanael West N. Y. & London 1957 (Farrar, Straus and Cudahy & Martin Secker and Warburg)Google Scholar
15.Light, James F., Nathanael West: An Interpretative Study, Northwestern U. P., 1961, p. 11.Google Scholar
16. Light, op. cit. pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
17.Malamud, Bernard, The Magic Barrel, N.Y. 1958, (Farrar, Straus and Cudahy) London (Eyre and Spottiswoode): reprinted N.Y. n.d., (Vintage).Google Scholar
18.Roth, Philip, Goodbye, Columbus, N.Y. 1959 and London 1959 (Andre Deutsch): reprinted London 1964 (Transworld).Google Scholar
19.Bellow, Saul, Herzog, N.Y. 1964 (Viking), London 1965 (Weidenfeld and Nicolson).Google Scholar
20. Saul Bellow; see note 2 above.Google Scholar
21.Bellow, Saul, “A Talk with the Yellow Kid”, The Reporter, 15 (Sept. 6th 1956) pp. 4144.Google Scholar
22.Hoffman, Frederick J., The Mortal No: Death and the Modern Imagination, Princeton U.P., 1964, p. 453.Google Scholar