Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:38:26.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Triple Graft: European Influence on American Science – 1727–1861

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2011

Get access

Extract

Those British virtuosos who later formed the Royal Society of London, once considered (according to an eighteenth century secretary) migrating to Connecticut, “had not the Civil wars happily ended as they did.” Whether true or not, the story indicates the attraction which America offered to the early fellows. Robert Boyle was very interested in the College of William and Mary, opened in 1692, and this interest resulted in the creation of a chair of mathematics and natural philosophy. Of its nine occupants up to the Revolution, Dr. William Small, who held it from 1758–1764 was the most influential. “He fixed the destinies of my life,” wrote Jefferson. He fixed the destinies of several others in England too, for he is generally credited with initiating the Lunar Society of Birmingham on his return to England.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for American Studies 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cromwell, Mortimer, Philosophical Transactions (London, 1741) cited R. S. Bates, Scientific Societies in the United States (New York 1958) p. 2. F. E. Brasch, The Newtonian Epoch in the American Colonies; F. E. Brasch, “The Royal Society of London and its influence upon Scientific Thought in the American Colonies” Scientific Monthly XXXIII (1931) 337–355. 448–449. Michael Kraus “Scientific Relations between Europe and America in the Eighteenth Century” Scientific Monthly LV (1942) 259–272.Google Scholar
2.Ewing, Galen C., “The Early Teaching of Science in the College of William and Mary in Virginia.Journal of Chemical Education XV (1938) 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cohen, I. B., Franklin and Newton (Philadelphia, 1956) 207–9; E. S. Dana and others, A Century of Science in America, with Especial Reference to the American Journal of Science (New Haven, 1918).Google Scholar
4.Coulson, T., Joseph Henry His Life and Work (Princeton, 1950) 14.Google Scholar
5.Small wood, op. cit., p. 145Google Scholar
6.Bates, R. S., Scientific Societies in the United States (New York, 1958)-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Jones, H.M., America and French Culture 1750–1848 (Chapel Hill, 1927)Google Scholar
8.Miller, V.C., Joel Barlow, Revolutionist (Hamburg, 1932); T.A. Zuider, The Early Days of Joel Barlow (1934); C. B. Todd, Life and Letters of Joel Barlow (New York, 1886), p. 82. In America his house ‘Kalorama’ housed the biggest and most valuable library in the country, and was the port of call of everyone of note: Fulton, the pioneer of steamboats, is said to have constructed a model of the Clermont there and to have first tested its powers on the waters of nearby Rock Creek.Google Scholar
9.Belknap papers. Massachusetts Historical Society Collections 5, Series II, p. 255.Google Scholar
10.Knight, A Documentary History of Education in the South before 1860 ii 86; H. B. Adams, Thomas Jefferson, the University of Virginia (Washington 1888)Google Scholar
11.Honeywell, Roy T., The Educational Work of Thomas Jefferson (Cambridge, Mass., 1931) 110111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Rathburn, Richard, “The Columbian Institute for the Promotion of Arts and Sciences,” Smithsonian Bulletin 101 (1917)Google Scholar
13.Goode, G. B., The Smithsonian Institution, 1846–1896 (Washington 1897)Google Scholar
14.Martin, E. T., Thomas Jefferson: Scientist (New York, 1952); C.A Browne, Thomas Jefferson and the Scientific Trends of his Times (1943); J. G. Greene, “Science and the Public in the Age of Jefferson.” Isis XLIX (1958) 13–25.Google Scholar
15.Crane, John & Kieley, J. F., United States Naval Academy; The First Hundred Years (New York, 1945).Google Scholar
16.Baumer, William, West Point, Moulder of Men (New York, 1942); Sidney Forman, West Point (New York), 1950; R. E. Dupuy, Men of West Point (New York, 1951).Google Scholar
17.Ricketts, Palmer C., History of the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1930).Google Scholar
McAllister, Ethel, Amos Eaton (Philadelphia, 1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hill, Forest G.Formative Relations of American Enterprise, Government and SciencePolitical Science Quarterly LXXV (1960) 419.Google Scholar
19.Finch, J. Kip, A History of the School of Engineering, Columbia University (New York, 1954), p. 58.Google Scholar
20.Pochmann, H.A., German Culture in America: Philosophical and Cultural Influences 1600–1900 (Madison, 1957) 45, 515.Google Scholar
21.Long, Orie W., Literary Pioneers: Early American Explorers of European Culture (Cambridge, Mass., 1935) and Charles F. Thwing, The American and German University (New York, 1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.For a brief historical sketch see Moulton, F. R. in Science CVIII (1948) 217–8.Google Scholar
23.Bates, op.cit. 239–40: Wittke, Carl, Refugees of Revolution (Philadelphia, 1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.For the influence of Gottingen, Halle, Berlin and Leipsig see Hinsdale, B.A. in Report of the U. S. Commissioner of Education I (18971898) 610–3 and for a partisan account Albert B. Faust, The German Element in the United States (New York, 1909).Google Scholar
25.For further studies see: Odgers, Merle M., Alexander Dullas Bache, Scientist and Educator 1806–1867 (Philadelphia, 1947); F.W. True, A History of the First Half Century of the National Academy of Sciences (Washington, 1913); Nathan Reingold, “Science in the Civil War” Isis XLIX (1949) pp. 307–318.Google Scholar
26.Gilbert, E.W., The Exploration of Western America 1500–1550 (Cambridge, 1933.Google Scholar
27.Tewkesbury, Donald G., Founding of Colleges and Universities before the Civil War (New York, 1932)Google Scholar
28.Hale, HarrisonEarly Chemical Laboratories West of the Mississippi.J. C. E. XIV (1937) pp 6265Google Scholar
29.Noshinger, J.S., Correspondence Schools, Lyceums and Chatouquas (1926)Google Scholar
30.Good, H. G., Scientific Monthly, March 1924; C. M. Haar, Journal of the History of Ideas IX (1948) 193–213. “He did more than anyone else to prepare the way in America for the great scientific awakening which first became visible after the publication of the Origin of the Species” wrote John Fiske in 1894. For generalised surveys see also: W. M. Smallwood and M. C. Smallwood, Natural History and the American Mind, (New York, 1941); Dirk Struik, Yankee Science in the Making (Boston, 1948); Theodore Hornberger, Scientific Thought in the American College 1638–1800 (Austin, 1945); I.B. Cohen, Some Early Tools of American Science (Cambridge, 1950); Louis W. McKeehan, Yale Science, The First Hundred Years (1701–1801); J.F. Fulton and E. H. Thomson, Benjamin Sillimon (New York, 1947); Courtney R. Hall, Samuel Latham Mitchell (New York, 1934); E. T. Martin, Thomas Jefferson: Scientist (New York, 1952); Whitfield J. Bell Jr., Early American Science. Needs and Opportunities for Study (Williamsburg, 1935); Wyndham Mills, “Early American Chemistry Societies” Chymia (1950) 111, pp. 95–113.Google Scholar