Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:39:11.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the New Deal on British Economic and Political Ideas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2011

R. H. Pear
Get access

Extract

The most important statement of Britain's economic and social aims to emerge from the experience of the depression and the Second World War was Beveridge's “Full Employment in a Free Society”. Published in 1944 it marks a revolution in the thinking of liberal economists. Laissez-faire is almost totally discarded. What replaces it is not socialism, but the socialisation of effective demand; the responsibility is thrust upon the State for the provision of income sufficiently large for the full employment of the human resource of labour. There were in 1944 (as there still are) many unfinished arguments concerning the best means of implementing the aim of full employment, but the responsibility of Central Governments in this matter is not in doubt. As the Times stated editorially “There is no question whether we can achieve full employment: we must achieve it. It is the central factor which will determine the pattern of national life after the war, including, perhaps, the fate of democratic institutions.” The revolution in thought which this editorial view point represents had something to do with the New Deal, but how much? in what respects was the New Deal influential? Can we separate out from the whole Anglo-American depression experience some particular features of America's recovery programme and distinguish them as influential in British thinking? I think that we cannot; but there is no doubt, on the other hand, that in the long conversation between British and American economists which went on through the 1930's and into the war years, American views and American experience made themselves felt amongst British economists.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the British Association for American Studies , Volume 4 , August 1962 , pp. 17 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for American Studies 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Times Editorial 16 February 1944Google Scholar
2.Arndt, H.W.: Economic Lessons of the 1930's, 1944 Arndt concludes that only detailed planning of production and trade – including international trade – can prevent repetitions of the depression phenomena. (There is a strong Liberal dissent from Sir A. Mcfadyean)Google Scholar
3.Strachey, John A Programme for Progress. 1940Google Scholar
4.Sir Steel-Maitland, Arthur (Conservative M. P.) was an exception. In his book The New America (1934), he accepts the view that capitalism is on trial, welcomes the spirit of the New Deal and sheds no tears for the ruined millionaires.Google Scholar
5.Vol. 1. No. 1. p. 1. 1934.Google Scholar
6.Vol. V. No. 1. 1934.Google Scholar
7. 1933 Vol. XLIII Seymour Harris wrote on “Economic Legislation of the U. S. “1936 Vol. XLVI Paul Douglas on Social Security Act and 1938 Vol. VL VIII R.M. Stein on the N. L. R. B.Google Scholar
8.Vol. II. 1934–5Google Scholar
9.Economist New Deal Supplement Oct. 3, 1936. Political Quarterly Special American Number October 1937Google Scholar
10.3 June 1933Google Scholar
11.13 January 1934Google Scholar
12.They were used everywhere by radicals and socialists to indict capitalism. Nourse, Edwin G. America's Capacity to Produce. M. Leven, H. G. Moulton and C. Warburton America's Capacity to Consume.Google Scholar
13.Published by the Socialist League (Capitalism in Crisis Series) 1934Google Scholar
14.What are we To Do 1938Google Scholar
15.The ‘New Deal’ owed nothing to Mr. Keynes, nor he to it. New Deal practices were based on some rather general economic theories. Mr. Keynes, General Theory (1936) was a highly theoretical treatise which drew neither inspiration nor example from the New Deal.Google Scholar
16.Jones, E. M. Hugh and Radice, E. A. had studied in America on Rockefeller and Commonwealth Fund Fellowships respectively.Google Scholar
17.Brockway, A. F. Will Roosevelt Succeed? 1934.Google Scholar
18.Burns, Emile and Roy, F.M. The Roosevelt Illusion (Labour Research Department)Google Scholar
19.Based upon a search of the catalogue of the British Library of Political-Economic Science (L. S. E.) under ‘Publication Dept’ ‘International Committee’ and other relevant heads of the three parties.Google Scholar
20.Crowther & Hutton were in editorial positions on the Economist in this period.Google Scholar
21.Amongst early ‘Left Book Club’ books were Joseph Freeman An American Testament, and Cedric Belfrage Promised Land (a novel about California).Google Scholar
22.There were amongst left wing intellectuals in the 1930's two kinds of Marxian devotion – to Karl and Groucho. Many cherished both, but Marx G. can hardly be said to be an American influence on intellectual moods. Julian Symons The 1930's (1960) which covers the literary and political scene quite adequately mentions America only as the place where Auden 's.Google Scholar