Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:46:40.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WEIGHT ELEMENTS OF THE KNOT GROUPS OF SOME THREE-STRAND PRETZEL KNOTS

Part of: Low-dimensional topology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2018

MASAKAZU TERAGAITO Open the ORCID record for MASAKAZU TERAGAITO [Opens in a new window]
MASAKAZU TERAGAITO*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8524, Japan email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A knot group has weight one, so is normally generated by a single element called a weight element of the knot group. A meridian is a typical weight element, but some knot groups admit other weight elements. We show that for some infinite classes of three-strand pretzel knots and all prime knots with up to eight crossings, the knot groups admit weight elements that are not automorphic images of meridians.

Keywords

weight elementknot grouppretzel knotbalanced presentation

MSC classification

Primary: 57M25: Knots and links in $S^3$
Secondary: 57M05: Fundamental group, presentations, free differential calculus
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , October 2018 , pp. 305 - 318
Copyright
© 2018 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

Footnotes

The author was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant no. JP16K05149.

References

Boileau, M. and Zimmermann, B., ‘The 𝜋-orbifold group of a link’, Math. Z. 200(2) (1989), 187–208.Google Scholar
Buck, D., Gibbons, J. and Staron, E., ‘Pretzel knots with unknotting number one’, Comm. Anal. Geom. 21(2) (2013), 365–408.Google Scholar
Cha, J. and Livingston, C., ‘KnotInfo: table of knot invariants’, http://www.indiana.edu/∼knotinfo, 16 October 2017.Google Scholar
Dutra, E., ‘On killers of cable knot groups’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 96(1) (2017), 171–176.Google Scholar
Feustel, C. D. and Whitten, W., ‘Groups and complements of knots’, Canad. J. Math. 30(6) (1978), 1284–1295.Google Scholar
Hillman, J., 2-Knots and Their Groups, Australian Mathematical Society Lecture Series, 5 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar
Kawauchi, A., ‘Classification of pretzel knots’, Kobe J. Math. 2(1) (1985), 11–22.Google Scholar
Miller III, C. and Schupp, P., ‘Some presentations of the trivial group’, in: Groups, Languages and Geometry (South Hadley, MA, 1998), Contemporary Mathematics, 250 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999), 113–115.Google Scholar
Riley, R., ‘Parabolic representations of knot groups, I’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 24 (1972), 217–242.Google Scholar
Rolfsen, D., Knots and Links, Mathematics Lecture Series, 7 (Publish or Perish, Houston, TX, 1990).Google Scholar
Silver, D., Whitten, W. and Williams, S., ‘Knot groups with many killers’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 81(3) (2010), 507–513.Google Scholar
Tsau, C., ‘Nonalgebraic killers of knot groups’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 95 (1985), 139–146.Google Scholar
Tsau, C., ‘Isomorphisms and peripheral structure of knot groups’, Math. Ann. 282(2) (1988), 343–348.Google Scholar