Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:28:46.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A UNIFIED APPROACH TO VARIOUS GENERALIZATIONS OF ARMENDARIZ RINGS

Part of: Conditions on elements Semigroups Chain conditions, growth conditions, and other forms of finiteness Rings and algebras with additional structure Rings and algebras arising under various constructions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2010

GREG MARKS ,
RYSZARD MAZUREK  and
MICHAŁ ZIEMBOWSKI
GREG MARKS*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA (email: [email protected])
RYSZARD MAZUREK
Affiliation:
Faculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15–351 Bialystok, Poland (email: [email protected])
MICHAŁ ZIEMBOWSKI
Affiliation:
Maxwell Institute of Sciences, School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK (email: [email protected])
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R be a ring, S a strictly ordered monoid, and ω:S→End(R) a monoid homomorphism. The skew generalized power series ring R[[S,ω]] is a common generalization of (skew) polynomial rings, (skew) power series rings, (skew) Laurent polynomial rings, (skew) group rings, and Mal’cev–Neumann Laurent series rings. We study the (S,ω)-Armendariz condition on R, a generalization of the standard Armendariz condition from polynomials to skew generalized power series. We resolve the structure of (S,ω)-Armendariz rings and obtain various necessary or sufficient conditions for a ring to be (S,ω)-Armendariz, unifying and generalizing a number of known Armendariz-like conditions in the aforementioned special cases. As particular cases of our general results we obtain several new theorems on the Armendariz condition; for example, left uniserial rings are Armendariz. We also characterize when a skew generalized power series ring is reduced or semicommutative, and we obtain partial characterizations for it to be reversible or 2-primal.

Keywords

skew generalized power series ring(S,ω)-Armendarizsemicommutative2-primalreversiblereduceduniserial

MSC classification

Secondary: 16S99: None of the above, but in this section 16W60: Valuations, completions, formal power series and related constructions 16P60: Chain conditions on annihilators and summands 16S36: Ordinary and skew polynomial rings and semigroup rings 16U80: Generalizations of commutativity 20M25: Semigroup rings, multiplicative semigroups of rings
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , June 2010 , pp. 361 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2010

Footnotes

The second author was supported by Bialystok University of Technology grant W/WI/7/08, MNiSW grant N N201 268435, and KBN grant 1 P03A 032 27.

References

[1]Anderson, D. D. and Camillo, V., ‘Armendariz rings and Gaussian rings’, Comm. Algebra 26(7) (1998), 2265–2272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Annin, S., ‘Associated primes over skew polynomial rings’, Comm. Algebra 30(5) (2002), 2511–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Armendariz, E. P., ‘A note on extensions of Baer and P.P.-rings’, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 18 (1974), 470–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Birkenmeier, G. F., Heatherly, H. E. and Lee, E. K., ‘Completely prime ideals and associated radicals’, in: Ring Theory (Granville, OH, 1992), (eds. Jain, S. K. and Rizvi, S. T.) (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993), pp. 102–129.Google Scholar
[5]Birkenmeier, G. F. and Park, J. K., ‘Triangular matrix representations of ring extensions’, J. Algebra 265(2) (2003), 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Camillo, V., Nicholson, W. K. and Yousif, M. F., ‘Ikeda–Nakayama rings’, J. Algebra 226 (2000), 1001–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Camillo, V. and Nielsen, P. P., ‘McCoy rings and zero-divisors’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212(3) (2008), 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Chen, W. and Tong, W., ‘A note on skew Armendariz rings’, Comm. Algebra 33 (2005), 1137–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Farbman, S. P., ‘The unique product property of groups and their amalgamated free products’, J. Algebra 178(3) (1995), 962–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Fuchs, L. and Shelah, S., ‘Kaplansky’s problem on valuation rings’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 105(1) (1989), 25–30.Google Scholar
[11]Hashemi, E. and Moussavi, A., ‘Polynomial extensions of quasi-Baer rings’, Acta Math. Hungar. 107(3) (2005), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hirano, Y., ‘On annihilator ideals of a polynomial ring over a noncommutative ring’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 168 (2002), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Hong, C. Y., Kim, N. K. and Kwak, T. K., ‘On skew Armendariz rings’, Comm. Algebra 31(1) (2003), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Huh, C., Kim, H. K. and Lee, Y., ‘Questions on 2-primal rings’, Comm. Algebra 26(2) (1998), 595–600.Google Scholar
[15]Huh, C., Kim, Y. and Smoktunowicz, A., ‘Armendariz rings and semicommutative rings’, Comm. Algebra 30(2) (2002), 751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Jategaonkar, A., ‘Skew polynomial rings over orders in Artinian rings’, J. Algebra 21 (1972), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Kim, N. K. and Lee, Y., ‘Armendariz rings and reduced rings’, J. Algebra 223(2) (2000), 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Kim, N. K., Lee, K. H. and Lee, Y., ‘Power series rings satisfying a zero divisor property’, Comm. Algebra 34(6) (2006), 2205–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Kosan, M. T., ‘The Armendariz module and its application to the Ikeda–Nakayama module’, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2006 (2006), 7. Article ID 35238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Krempa, J., ‘Some examples of reduced rings’, Algebra Colloq. 3(4) (1996), 289–300.Google Scholar
[21]Lam, T. Y., A First Course in Noncommutative Rings, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 131 (Springer, New York, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Lee, T.-K. and Wong, T.-L., ‘On Armendariz rings’, Houston J. Math. 29(3) (2003), 583–593.Google Scholar
[23]Lee, T.-K. and Zhou, Y., ‘A unified approach to the Armendariz property of polynomial rings and power series rings’, Colloq. Math. 113(1) (2008), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Liu, Z., ‘Special properties of rings of generalized power series’, Comm. Algebra 32(8) (2004), 3215–3226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Liu, Z., ‘Armendariz rings relative to a monoid’, Comm. Algebra 33(3) (2005), 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Marks, G., ‘Direct product and power series formations over 2-primal rings’, in: Advances in Ring Theory, 26, (eds. Jain, S. K. and Rizvi, S. T.) (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1997), pp. 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Marks, G., ‘Reversible and symmetric rings’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 174(3) (2002), 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Marks, G., ‘A taxonomy of 2-primal rings’, J. Algebra 266(2) (2003), 494–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Marks, G., Mazurek, R. and Ziembowski, M., ‘A new class of unique product monoids with applications to ring theory’, Semigroup Forum 78(2) (2009), 210–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Matczuk, J., ‘A characterization of σ-rigid rings’, Comm. Algebra 32(11) (2004), 4333–4336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Mazurek, R. and Ziembowski, M., ‘On von Neumann regular rings of skew generalized power series’, Comm. Algebra 36(5) (2008), 1855–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Moussavi, A. and Hashemi, E., ‘On (α,δ)-skew Armendariz rings’, J. Korean Math. Soc. 42(2) (2005), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Nagore, C. S. and Satyanarayana, M., ‘On naturally ordered semigroups’, Semigroup Forum 18(2) (1979), 95–103.Google Scholar
[34]Nasr-Isfahani, A. R. and Moussavi, A., ‘On classical quotient rings of skew Armendariz rings’, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2007 (2007), 7. Article ID 61549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35]Okniński, J., Semigroup Algebras, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 138 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
[36]Puczyłowski, E. R., ‘Questions related to Koethe’s nil ideal problem’, in: Algebra and its Applications, Contemporary Mathematics, 419 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006), pp. 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37]Rege, M. B. and Chhawchharia, S., ‘Armendariz rings’, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 73 (1997), 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar