Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:39:57.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quasi-Baer ring extensions and biregrular rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Gary F. Birkenmeier ,
Jin Yong Kim  and
Jae Keol Park
Gary F. Birkenmeier
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette LA 70504–1010, United States of America, e-mail: [email protected]
Jin Yong Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Busan National University, Busan 609–735, South Korea, e-mail: [email protected]
Jae Keol Park
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Kyung Hee University, Suwon 449–701, South Korea, e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A ring R with unity is called a (quasi-) Baer ring if the left annihilator of every (left ideal) nonempty subset of R is generated (as a left ideal) by an idempotent. Armendariz has shown that if R is a reduced PI-ring whose centre is Baer, then R is Baer. We generalise his result by considering the broader question: when does the (quasi-) Baer condition extend to a ring from a subring? Also it is well known that a regular ring is Baer if and only if its lattice of principal right ideals is complete. Analogously, we prove that a biregular ring is quasi-Baer if and only if its lattice of principal ideals is complete.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 39 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2000

References

REFERENCES

[1]Armendariz, E.P., ‘A note on extensions of Baer and p.p.-rings’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 18 (1974), 470–473.Google Scholar
[2]Bell, H.E., ‘Near-rings in which each element is a power of itself’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 2 (1970), 363–368.Google Scholar
[3]Berberian, S.K., Baer *-Rings (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Birkenmeier, G.F., ‘Baer rings and quasi-continuous rings have a MDSN’, Pacific J. Math. 97 (1981), 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Birkenmeier, G.F., ‘Idempotents and completely semiprime ideals, Comm. Algebra 11 (1983), 567–580.Google Scholar
[6]Birkenmeier, G.F., ‘Decompositions of Baer-like rings’, Acta Math. Hungar. 59 (1992), 319–326.Google Scholar
[7]Birkenmeier, G.F., Heatherly, H.E., Kim, J.Y. and Park, J.K., ‘Triangular matrix representations’, (preprint).Google Scholar
[8]Birkenmeier, G.F., Kim, J.Y. and Park, J.K., ‘Rings with countably many direct summands’, Comm. Algebra (to appear).Google Scholar
[9]Chase, S., ‘A generalization of the ring of triangular matrices’, Nagoya Math. J. 18 (1961), 13–25.Google Scholar
[10]Chatters, A.W. and Hajarnavis, C.R., Rings with chain conditions (Pitman, Boston, 1980).Google Scholar
[11]Chatters, A.W. and Khuri, S.M., ‘Endomorphism rings of modules over nonsingular CS-rings’, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 21 (1980), 434–444.Google Scholar
[12]Clark, W.E., ‘Twisted matrix units semigroup algebras’, Duke Math. J. 34 (1967), 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]DeMeyer, F. and Ingraham, E., Separable algebras over commutative rings, Lecture Notes in Math. 181 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
[14]Faith, C., ‘Injective quotient rings of commutative rings’, in Module theory, Springer Lecture Notes 700 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979), pp. 151–203.Google Scholar
[15]Fisher, J.W., ‘Structure of semiprime P.I. rings’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 39 (1973), 465–467.Google Scholar
[16]Goodearl, K.R., Ring theory – nonsingular rings and modules (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
[17]Goodearl, K.R., Von Neumann regular rings (Pitman, London, 1979).Google Scholar
[18]Jacobson, N., Structure of rings, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ.37 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1964).Google Scholar
[19]Kaplansky, I., Rings of operators (Benjamin, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
[20]Lawrence, J., ‘A singular primitive ring’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1974), 59–62.Google Scholar
[21]Lee, Y., Kim, N.K. and Hong, C.Y., ‘Counterexamples in Baer rings’, Comm. Algebra 25 (1997), 497–507.Google Scholar
[22]Pollingher, A. and Zaks, A., ‘On Baer and quasi-Baer rings’, Duke Math. J. 37 (1970), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Rowen, L., ‘Some results on the center of a ring with polynomial identity’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), 219–223.Google Scholar
[24]Sherman, S., ‘The second adjoint of a C*-algebra’, Proc. Intern. Cong. Math. Cambridge 1 (1950), 470.Google Scholar
[25]Shin, G., ‘Prime ideals and sheaf representation of a pseudo symmetric ring’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 184 (1973), 43–61.Google Scholar
[26]Small, L.W., ‘Semihereditary rings’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 656–658.Google Scholar
[27]Stenström, B., Rings of quotients (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
[28]Takeda, Z., ‘Conjugate spaces of operator algebras’, Proc. Japan Acad. 30 (1954), 90–95.Google Scholar
[29]Utumi, Y., ‘On rings of which any one-sided quotient rings are two-sided’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1963), 141–147.Google Scholar