No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
THE PERFORMANCE OF SOME STATISTICAL PROCEDURES USED IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES AND METHYLOMICS
Part of:
Parametric inference
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Keywords
MSC classification
Primary:
62F03: Hypothesis testing
Secondary:
92D20: Protein sequences, DNA sequences
- Type
- Abstracts of Australasian PhD Theses
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2020 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.
Footnotes
Thesis submitted to La Trobe University in March 2019; degree approved on 14 August 2019; principal supervisor Paul Kabaila, co-supervisor Agus Salim.
References
Hjort, N. L. and Claeskens, G., ‘Frequentist model average estimators’, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 98(464) (2003), 879–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurvich, C. M. and Tsai, C.-L., ‘The impact of model selection on inference in linear regression’, Amer. Statist. 44(3) (1990), 214–217.Google Scholar
Kabaila, P. and Kuveke, R. E. H., ‘The large sample coverage probability of confidence intervals in general regression models after a preliminary hypothesis test’, Scand. J. Stat. 46(2) (2019), 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korthauer, K. D., Chakraborty, S., Benjamini, Y. and Irizarry, R. A., ‘Detection and accurate false discovery rate control of differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulfite sequencing’, Biostatistics 20(3) (2018), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafi, A., Mitrea, C., Nguyen, T. and Draghici, S., ‘A survey of the approaches for identifying differential methylation using bisulfite sequencing data’, Brief. Bioinform. 19(5) (2018), 737–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You have
Access