We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Coefficient and integral mean bounds are obtained for functions subordinate to close-to-convex functions.
[1]Baernstein, A., “Integral means, univalent functions and circular symmetrization”, Acta Math.133 (1974), 129–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]
[2]Baernstein, A. and Brown, J., “Integral means of derivatives of monotone slit mappings”, Comment. Math. Helv.57 (1982), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]
[3]Brannan, D. and Clunie, J., Aspects of Contemporary Complex Analysis, (Academic Press, 1980).Google Scholar
[4]
[4]Duren, P., Univalent Functions, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
[5]
[5]Elhosh, M.M., “On the logarithmic derivatives of close-to-convex functions”, Math. Japon. (to appear)Google Scholar
[6]
[6]Hallenbeck, D. and MacGregor, T., Linear Problems and Convexity Techniques in Geometric Function Theory, (Pitman Publ. Ltd., 1984).Google Scholar
[7]
[7]Hille, E., Ordinary differential equations in the complex domain, (John Wiley, 1976).Google Scholar
[8]
[8]Leung, Y., “Integral means of derivatives of some univalent functions”, Bull. London Math. Soc.11 (1979, 289–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]
[9]MacGregor, T., “Applications of extreme-point theory to univalent functions”, Michingan Math. J.19 (1972), 361–376.Google Scholar
[10]
[10]Noor, K., “On the Hankel determinants of close-to-convex univalent functions”, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci.3 (1980), 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar