Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:12:02.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On profiniteness of compact totally disconnected algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

B.J. Day
B.J. Day
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper presents a necessary and sufficient condition for a given compact totally disconnected space C to be the projective limit of a given directed cone of epimorphisms onto finite discrete quotients of C. This problem is related to the question of when a compact totally disconnected algebra is profinite and some observations in this direction are recorded.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 71 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1979

References

[1]Choe, Tae Ho, “Zero-dimensional compact associative distributive universal algebras”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1974), 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Day, B.J., “On Pontryagin duality”, Glasgow Math. J. (to appear).Google Scholar
[3]Grätzer, George, Universal algebra (Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey; Toronto; London; Melbourne; 1968).Google Scholar
[4]Hofmann, Karl Heinrich, “Category theoretical methods in topological algebra”, Categorical topology, 345–403 (Proc. Conf. Mannheim, 1975. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 540. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Mac Lane, S., Categories for the working mathematician (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 5. Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Numakura, Katsumi, “Theorems on compact totally disconnected semigroups and lattices”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1957), 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar