Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-v8j7l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T07:08:47.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On product-preserving Kan extensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Francis Borceux  and
B. J. Day
Francis Borceux
Affiliation:
Institut de Mathématique pure et appliquée, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium;
B. J. Day
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this article we examine the problem of when a left Kan extension of a finite-product-preserving functor is finite-product preserving. This extension property is of significance in the development of finitary universal algebra in a closed category, details of which will appear elsewher. We give a list of closed categories with the required extension property.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 247 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1977

References

[1]Borceux, Francis and Day, Brian, “Universal algebra in a closed category”, J. Pure Appl. Algebra (to appear).Google Scholar
[2]Borceux, Francis and Kelly, G.M., “A notion of limit for enriched categories”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 12 (1975), 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Day, Brian, “On closed categories of functors”, Reports of the midwest Category Seminar IV, 1–38 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 137. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
[4]Day, B.J. and Kelly, G.M., “Enriched functor categories”, Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar III, 178–191 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 106. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Eilenberg, Samuel and Kelly, G. Max, “Closed categories”,Proc. Conf. Categorical Algebra,La Jolla, California,1965, 421–562 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kelly, G.M., “Adjunction for enriched categories”, Reports of the Midwest Category Seminar III, 166–177 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 106. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Linton, F.E.J., “Coequalisers in categories of algebras”, Seminar on triples and categorical homology theory, 75–90 (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 80. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lane, S. Mac, Categories for the working mathematician (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 5. Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar