Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:20:22.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On decoupling of linear recursions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

R.M.M. Mattheij
R.M.M. Mattheij
Affiliation:
Mathematisch Institut, Katholieke Universiteit, Toernooiveld, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show how a well known algorithm to compute solutions of a second order recursion which are unstable both in forward and in backward direction, can be related to a number of other methods. They are: order reduction, invariant imbedding and decoupling based on triangularization. It is shown that these methods in this order form an increasingly general approach to solve the problem. In particular this means that the stability of the first three algorithms can be understood from the theory that has been established for the decoupling algorithm. In this way one does not need to investigate the stability of the large sparse system which is often related to the first method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 347 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1983

References

[1]Cash, J.R., “A note on Olver's algorithm for the solution of second-order linear difference equations”, Math. Comp. 35 (1980), 767–772.Google Scholar
[2]Cash, J.R., Stable recursions. With applications to the numerical solution of stiff systems (Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich], London, New York, Toronto, 1979).Google Scholar
[3]Lozier, Daniel W., “Numerical solution of linear difference equations” (Report NBSIR 80–1976. National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Mattheij, R.M.M., “Estimating and determining solutions of matrix vector recursions” (PhD thesis, Utrecht, 1977).Google Scholar
[5]Mattheij, R.M.M., “Characterizations of dominant and dominated solutions of linear recursions”, Numer. Math. 35 (1980), 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Mattheij, R.M.M., “Stable computation of solutions of unstable linear initial value recursions”, BIT 22 (1982), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Meyer, Gunter H., Initial value methods for boundary value problems: Theory and application of invariant imbedding (Mathematics in Science and Engineering, 100. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich], New York and London, 1973).Google Scholar
[8]Nörlund, Niels Erik, Vorlesungen über Differenzenrechnung (Chelsea, New York, 1954).Google Scholar
[9]Oliver, J., “The numerical solution of linear recurrence relations”, Numer. Math. 11 (1968), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Olver, F.W.J., “Numerical solution of second-order linear difference equations”, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards 71B (1967), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Olver, F.W.J. and Sookne, D.J., “Note on backward recurrence algorithms”, Math. Comp. 26 (1972), 941–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Wilkinson, J.H., The algebraic eigenvalue problem (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar