No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
New characterisations of pseudocompact spaces
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2009
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In this paper, we give a new characterisation of pseudo-compact spaces, namely a space X is pseudocompact if and only if each σ-point finite open cover of X has a finite subfamily whose union is dense. As a corollary, we show that every pseudocompact σ-metacompact (or screenable) space is compact, which sharpens some known results.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 293 - 298
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1988
References
[1]Bagley, R.W., Connell, E.H. and McKnight, J.D. Jr ‘On properties characterising pseudocompact spaces’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1958), 500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Burke, D.A. and Davis, S.W., ‘Pseudocompact paralindelof spaces are compact’, Abstracts Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1982), p. 213.Google Scholar
[4]Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions: Graduate Texts in Math. 43 (Springer, Berlin, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Rudin, M.E., ‘A normal screenable non-paracompact space’, Topology Appl. 15 (1983), p. 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Stephenson, R.M., ‘Pseudocompact spaces’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 134 (1968), 436–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Watson, W.S., ‘Pseudocompact metacompact spaces are compact’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81 (1981), p. 151.Google Scholar
[8]Watson, W.S., ‘Pseudocompact meta-Lindelöf space which is not compact’, Topology Appl. 20 (1985), 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access