Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:13:26.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A minimax inequality with applications to existence of equilibrium points

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Kok-Keong Tan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing Science Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaB3H 3J5
Zian-Zhi Yuan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing Science Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaB3H 3J5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new minimax inequality is first proved. As a consequence, five equivalent fixed point theorems are formulated. Next a theorem concerning the existence of maximal elements for an Lc-majorised correspondence is obtained. By the maximal element theorem, existence theorems of equilibrium points for a non-compact one-person game and for a non-compact qualitative game with Lc-majorised correspondences are given. Using the latter result and employing an “approximation” technique used by Tulcea, we deduce equilibrium existence theorems for a non-compact generalised game with LC correspondences in topological vector spaces and in locally convex topological vector spaces. Our results generalise the corresponding results due to Border, Borglin-Keiding, Chang, Ding-Kim-Tan, Ding-Tan, Shafer-Sonnenschein, Shih-Tan, Toussaint, Tulcea and Yannelis-Prabhakar.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]Ben-El-Mechaiekh, H., Deguire, P. et Granas, A., ‘Une alterantive non lineaire en analyse convexe et applications’, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 295 (1982), 257259.Google Scholar
[2]Border, K.C., Fixed point theorems with applications to economics and game theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, Now York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Borglin, A. and Keiding, H., ‘Existence of equilibrium actions of equilibrium, A note the ‘new’ existence theorems’, J. Math. Econom. 3 (1976), 313316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Browder, F.E., ‘The fixed point theory of multi-valued mappings in topological vector space’, Math. Ann. 177 (1968), 283301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Chang, S.Y., ‘On the Nash equilibrium’, Soochow J. Math. 16 (1990), 241248.Google Scholar
[6]Ding, X.P. and Tan, K.K., ‘A minimax inequality with applications to existence of equilibrium point and fixed point theorems’, Colloq. Math. 63 (1992), 233247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Ding, X.P. and Tan, K.K., ‘Fixed point theorems and equilibria of non-compact games’, in Fixed Point Theory and Applications, (Tan, K.K., Editor) (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), pp. 8096.Google Scholar
[8]Ding, X.P., Kim, W.K. and Tan, K.K., ‘Equilibria of non-compact generalized games with L*-majorized preference correspondences’, J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1992), 508517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Dugundji, J., Topology (Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, 1966).Google Scholar
[10]Fan, K., ‘A generalization of Tychonoff's fixed point theorem’, Math. Ann. 142 (1961), 305310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Fan, K., ‘A minimax inequality and its applications’, in Inequalities III, (Shisha, O., Editor) (Academic Press, 1972), pp. 103113.Google Scholar
[12]Gale, D. and Mas-Colell, A., ‘On the role of complete, translative preferences in equilibrium theory’, in Equilibrium and disequilibrium in economics theory, (Schwödiauer, G., Editor) (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 714.Google Scholar
[13]Kelley, J.L., General topology (Spring-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1955).Google Scholar
[14]Knaster, B., Kuratowski, C. and Mazurkiewicz, S., ‘Ein Beweis des Fixpunktsatzes für n -dimensionale Simplexe’, Fund. Math. 14 (1929), 132137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Mehta, G. and Tarafdar, E., ‘Infinite-dimensional Gale-Dubreau theorem and a fixed point theorem of Tarafdar’, J. Econom. Theory 41 (1987), 333339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Shafer, W. and Sonnenschein, H., ‘Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences’, J. Math. Econom. 2 (1975), 345348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Shih, M.H. and Tan, K.K., ‘The Ky Fan minimax principle, sets with convex sections, and variational inequalities’, in Differential geometry, calculus of variations and their applications, (Rassias, G. M. and Rassias, T. M., Editors), Lecture Notes in Pure Appl. Math. 100 (Dekker, 1985), pp. 471481.Google Scholar
[18]Shih, M.H. and Tan, K.K., ‘A minimax inequality and Browder-Hartman-Stampacchia variational inequalities for multi-valued monotone operators’, in Proceedings of Fourth FRANCO-SEAMS Joint Conference (Chiang Mai, Thailand, 1988). DAL TR-88–2.Google Scholar
[19]Tarafdar, E., ‘On nonlinear variational inequalities’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1977), 9598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Tarafdar, E., ‘Variational problems via a fixed point theorem’, Indian J. Math. 28 (1986), 229240.Google Scholar
[21]Toussaint, S., ‘On the existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities and without ordered preferences’, J Econom. Theory 33 (1984), 98115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Tulcea, C.I., ‘On the equlibriums of generalized games’, (The Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, paper No. 696, 1986).Google Scholar
[23]Tulcea, C.I., ‘On the approximation of upper-semicontinuous correspondences and the equilibriums of generalized games’, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 136 (1988), 267289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Wilansky, A., Topology for analysis (Waltham, Massachusetts, Toronto, 1972).Google Scholar
[25]Yannelis, N.C., ‘Maximal elements over non-compact subsets of linear topological spaces’, Econom. Lett. 17 (1985), 133136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Yannelis, N.C. and Prabhakar, N.D., ‘Existence of maiximal elements and equilibria in linear topological spaces’, J. Math. Econom. 12 (1983), 233245. Erratum 13 (1984), 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Yen, C. L., ‘A minimax inequality ans its applications to variational inequalities’, Pacific J. Math. 97 (1981), 477481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar