Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:08:03.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hirschhorn's identities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Paul Hammond
Affiliation:
SMSThe University of SussexBrighton BN1 9QHUnited Kingdom
Richard Lewis
Affiliation:
SMSThe University of SussexBrighton BN1 9QHUnited Kingdom
Zhi-Guo Liu
Affiliation:
SMSThe University of SussexBrighton BN1 9QHUnited Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We prove a general identity between power series and use this identity to give proofs of a number of identities proposed by M.D. Hirschhorn. We also use the identity to give proofs of a well-known result of Jacobi, the quintuple-product identity and Winquist's identity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1999

References

[1]Andrews, G.E., Lewis, R.P. and Liu, Z-G., ‘An Identity relating a theta function and a sum of Lambert series’, (in preparation).Google Scholar
[2]Atkin, A.O.L. and Swinnerton-Dyer, P., ‘Some properties of partitions’, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 4 (1954), 84106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ewell, J.A., ‘Arithmetical consequences of a sextuple product identity’, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 25 (1995), 12871293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hardy, G.H. and Wright, E.M., The theory of numbers, (3rd edition) (Oxford University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
[5]Hirschhorn, M.D., ‘A simple proof of Jacobi's four-square theorem’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 32 (1982), 6167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Lewis, R.P., ‘A combinatorial proof of the triple product identity’, Amer. Math. Monthly 91 (1984), 420423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Lewis, R.P., ‘On the ranks of partitions modulo 9’, Bull. London Math. Soc. 23 (1991), 417421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Slater, L.J., Generalized hypergeometric functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1966).Google Scholar
[9]Winquist, L., ‘An elementary proof of p(llm + 6) = 0 (mod 11)’, J. Comb. Theory 6 (1969), 5659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Whittaker, E.T. and Watson, G.N., A course of modern analysis, (4th edition) (Cambridge University Pess, New York, 1950).Google Scholar