Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:38:54.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DOMAIN PERTURBATION FOR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS

Part of: Parabolic equations and systems Partial differential equations Existence theories Infinite-dimensional dissipative dynamical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2011

PARINYA SA NGIAMSUNTHORN
PARINYA SA NGIAMSUNTHORN*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia (email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

bounded entire solutionsdomain perturbationinitial-boundary value problemsinvariant manifoldsparabolic equations

MSC classification

Secondary: 35B20: Perturbations 35K20: Initial-boundary value problems for second-order parabolic equations 35K58: Semilinear parabolic equations 35K90: Abstract parabolic equations 37L05: General theory, nonlinear semigroups, evolution equations 49J40: Variational methods including variational inequalities
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 174 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2011

References

[1]Arendt, W., ‘Approximation of degenerate semigroups’, Taiwanese J. Math. 5(2) (2001), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bucur, D. and Varchon, N., ‘Boundary variation for a Neumann problem’, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. 29(4) (2000), 807–821.Google Scholar
[3]Dancer, E. N., ‘The effect of domain shape on the number of positive solutions of certain nonlinear equations’, J. Differential Equations 74(1) (1988), 120–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Dancer, E. N., ‘The effect of domain shape on the number of positive solutions of certain nonlinear equations. II’, J. Differential Equations 87(2) (1990), 316–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Daners, D., ‘Domain perturbation for linear and nonlinear parabolic equations’, J. Differential Equations 129(2) (1996), 358–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Daners, D., ‘Dirichlet problems on varying domains’, J. Differential Equations 188(2) (2003), 591–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Daners, D., ‘Perturbation of semi-linear evolution equations under weak assumptions at initial time’, J. Differential Equations 210(2) (2005), 352–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Daners, D., ‘Domain perturbation for linear and semi-linear boundary value problems’, in: Handbook of Differential Equations: Stationary Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 6 (ed. Chipot, M.) (Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam, 2008), pp. 1–81.Google Scholar
[9]Mosco, U., ‘Convergence of convex sets and of solutions of variational inequalities’, Adv. Math. 3 (1969), 510–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Sa Ngiamsunthorn, P., ‘Persistence of bounded solutions of parabolic equations under domain perturbation’, J. Evol. Equ., in press, doi 10.1007/s00028–011–0121–3.Google Scholar
[11]Sa Ngiamsunthorn, P., ‘An abstract approach to domain perturbation for parabolic equations and parabolic variational inequalities’, Preprint, arXiv:1109.3257.Google Scholar
[12]Sa Ngiamsunthorn, P., ‘Invariant manifolds for parabolic equations under perturbation of the domain’, Preprint, arXiv:1109.3260.Google Scholar