Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-14T14:37:12.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does the Frobenius endomorphism always generate a direct summand in the endomorphism monoids of fields of prime characteristic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Péter Pröhle
Péter Pröhle
Affiliation:
Department of Algebra and Number Theory, L. Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let r be a given prime. Then a monoid M is the endomorphism monoid of a field of characteristic r if and only if either M is a finite cyclic group or M is a right cancellative monoid and M has an element of infinite order in its centre. The main lemma is the technical base of the present and other papers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 335 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1984

References

REFERENCES

[1]Fried, E., “Automorphism group of integral domains fixing a given subring”. Algebra Universalis 7 (1977), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Fried, E. and Kollár, J., “Automorphism groups of fields”, Preprints of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (1978).Google Scholar
[3]Grätzer, G., Universal Algebra (Springer-Verlag, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]De Groot, J., “Groups represented by homeomorphism groups I”, Math. Ann. 138 (1959), 80–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kuyk, W., “The construction of fields with infinite cyclic automorphism group”, Canad. J. Math. 17 (1965), 665–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Pultr, A. and Trnková, V., Combinatorial algebraic and topological representations of groups, semigroups and categories (Academia Prague, 1980).Google Scholar
[7]Rédei, L., Algebra (Pergamon Press, 1967).Google Scholar
[8]Vopenka, P., Pultr, A. and Hedrlín, Z., “A rigid relation exists on any set”, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 6 (1965), 149–155.Google Scholar
[9]van der Waerden, B. L., Algebra (Springer-Verlag, 1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar