Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T03:39:25.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convex sets with lattice point constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Poh Wah Awyong
Poh Wah Awyong
Affiliation:
School of Science/Division of MathematicsNanyang Technological UniversityNational Institute of Education469 Bukit Timah RoadSingapore 259756 e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Abstracts of Australasian Ph.D. theses
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , August 1997 , pp. 161 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1997

References

[1]Awyong, P.W. and Scott, P.R., ‘On the maximal circumradius of a planar convex set containing one lattice point’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 52 (1995), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Awyong, P.W. and Scott, P.R., ‘Width-diameter relations for planar convex sets with lattice point constraints’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 53 (1996), 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Awyong, P.W. and Scott, P.R., ‘New inequalities of planar convex sets with lattice point constraints’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 54 (1996), 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Minkowski, H., Geometrie der Zahlen (Teubner, Leipzig, 1911).Google Scholar
[5]Scott, P.R., ‘Two inequalities for convex sets with lattice point constraints in the plane’, Bull. London. Math. Soc. 11 (1979), 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Scott, P.R., ‘Further inequalities for convex sets with lattice point constraints in the plane’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 21 (1980), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Scott, P.R., ‘Two problems in the plane’, Amer. Math. Monthly 89 (1982), 460–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar