Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:27:18.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined two stabilities imply Axiom A for vector fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Lan Wen
Lan Wen
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is proved in this paper that if a vector field is both C structurally stable and topologically stable, then it satisfies Axiom A.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , August 1993 , pp. 23 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]Chi, D.P., Choi, S.K. and Park, J.S., ‘Structurally stable flows’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 45 (1992), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Ding, H., ‘Disturbance of the homoclinic trajectory and applications’, (in Chinese), Acta. Sci. Natur. Univ. Pekinensis 1 (1986), 53–63.Google Scholar
[3]Franks, J., ‘Necessary conditions for stability of diffeomorphisms’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 158 (1971), 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hurley, M., ‘Consequences of topological stability’, J. Differential Equations 54 (1984), 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hurley, M., ‘Combined structural and topological stability are equivalent to Axiom A and the strong transversality condition’, Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems 4 (1984), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Liao, S., ‘Obstruction sets (II)’, (in Chinese), Acta Sci. Natur. Univ. Pekinensis 2 (1981), 1–36.Google Scholar
[7]Liao, S., ‘Obstruction sets, minimal rambling sets and their applications’, in Chinese Mathematics into the 21st Century (Peking Univ. Press, 1991), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
[8]Mañé, R., ‘An ergodic closing lemma’, Ann. of Math. 116 (1982), 503–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Māńe, R., ‘A proof of the C 1 stability conjecture’, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. 66 (1987), 161–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Nitecki, Z., ‘On semistability for diffeomorphisms’, Invent. Math. 14 (1971), 83–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Peixoto, M.M., ‘Structural stability on two-dimensional manifolds’, Topology 1 (1962), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Palis, J. and Smale, S., ‘Structural stability theorems’, in Global Analysis, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 14 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1970), pp. 223–231.Google Scholar
[13]Robinson, C., ‘C r structural stability implies Kupka-Smale’, in Dynamical systems, Salvador 1971 (Academic Press, 1973), pp. 443–449.Google Scholar
[14]Robinson, C., ‘Structural stability of vector fields’, Ann. of Math 99 (1974), 154–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Robinson, C., ‘Stability theorems and hyperbolicity in dynamical systems’, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 7 (1977), 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Shub, M., ‘Dynamical systems, filtrations and entropy’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 (1974), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar