Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:24:04.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coboundary equations of eventually expanding transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Young-Ho Ahn
Young-Ho Ahn
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea, e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let T be an eventually expansive transformation on the unit interval satisfying the Markov condition. The T is an ergodic transformation on (X, ß, μ) where X = [0, 1), ß is the Borel σ-algebra on the unit interval and μ is the T invariant absolutely continuous measure. Let G be a finite subgroup of the circle group or the whole circle group and φ: X → G be a measurable function with finite discontinuity points. We investigate ergodicity of skew product transformations Tφ on X × G by showing the solvability of the coboundary equation φ(x) g (Tx) = λg (x), |λ| = 1. Its relation with the uniform distribution mod M is also shown.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , February 2003 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

REFERENCES

[1]Adler, R. and Flatto, L., ‘Geodesic flows, interval maps and symbolic dynamics’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (1991), 229–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Ahn, Y. and Choe, G.H., ‘Spectral types of skewed Bernoulli shift’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bedford, T., Keane, M. and Series, C.(eds.), Ergodic theory, symbolic dynamics and hyperbolic space (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1991), PP. 107–109.Google Scholar
[4]Boyarsky, A. and Góra, P., Laws of chaos (Birkhäuser, Boston MA, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Coelho, Z. and Parry, W., ‘Shift endomorphisms and compact Lie extensions’, Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat. (N.S.) 29 (1998), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hlawka, E., The theory of uniform distribution (A B Academic publishers, Berkhamsted, 1984).Google Scholar
[7]Li, T. and Yorke, J.A., ‘Ergodic transformations from an interval into itself’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 235 (1978), 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Perry, W., ‘A Cocycle equation for shift’, Contemp. Math. 135 (1992), 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Siboni, S., ‘Ergodic properties of a class of skew-systems obtained by coupling the transformation of the 1-torus with the endomorphism 2x mod [0, 1[’, Nonlinearity 7 (1994), 1133–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Veech, W.A., ‘Strict ergodicity in zero dimensional dynamical system and the Kronecker-Weyl theorem mod 2’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (1969), 1–33.Google Scholar
[11]Walters, P., An introduction to Ergodic theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar