No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A characterisation of compact minimal hypersurfaces in a unit sphere
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2009
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In this note, we show that the totally geodesic sphere, Clifford torus and Cartan hypersurface are the only compact minimal hypersurfaces in S4(1) with constant scalar curvature if the Ricci curvature is not less than −1.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993
References
[1]Cheng, Q.M., ‘Complete minimal hypersurfaces in S 4(1) with constant scalar curvature’, Osaka Math. J. 27 (1990), 885–892.Google Scholar
[2]Cheng, Q.M. and Jiang, B., ‘3-dimensional submanifolds of spheres with parallel mean curvature vector’, Tsukuba J. Math. 16 (1992), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Chern, S.S., do Carmo, M. and Kobayashi, S., ‘Minimal submanifolds of a sphere with second fundamental form of constant length’, in Functional analysis and related fields (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1970), pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
[4]de Almeida, S. and Brito, F.G., ‘Closed 3-dimensional hypersurfaces with constant mean curvature and constant scalar curvature’, Duke Math. J. 61 (1990), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Doi, N., ‘On compact minimal hypersurfaces in a sphere with constant scalar curvature’, Nagoya Math. J. 78 (1980), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Okumura, M., ‘Hypersurfaces and a pinching problem on the second fundamental tensor’, Amer. J. Math. 96 (1974), 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Omori, H., ‘Isometric immersions of Riemannian manifolds’, J. Math. Soc. Japan 19 (1967), 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Yau, S.T., ‘Submanifolds with constant mean curvature II’, Amer. J. Math. 97 (1975), 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] S.T. Yau, ‘Hamonic functions on complete Riemannian manifolds’, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 28 (1975), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar