Hostname: page-component-66644f4456-976bt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T08:12:04.629Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BOUNDED CONJUGACY CLASSES AND CONJUGACY CLASSES SUPPORTING INVARIANT MEASURES AND AUTOMORPHISMS

Part of: Probability theory on algebraic and topological structures Locally compact groups and their algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2025

C. R. E. RAJA Open the ORCID record for C. R. E. RAJA [Opens in a new window]
C. R. E. RAJA*
Affiliation:
Stat-Math Unit, Indian Statistical Institute (ISI), 8th Mile Mysore Road, Bangalore 560 059, India
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider conjugacy classes in a locally compact group G that support finite G-invariant measures. If G is a property (M) extension of an abelian group, in particular, if G is a metabelian group, then any such conjugacy class is relatively compact. As an application, centralisers of lattices in such groups have bounded conjugacy classes. We use the same techniques to obtain results in the case of totally disconnected, locally compact groups.

Keywords

locally compact groupconjugacy classfinite measuresautomorphismtdlc group

MSC classification

Primary: 22D05: General properties and structure of locally compact groups
Secondary: 22D45: Automorphism groups of locally compact groups 60B15: Probability measures on groups or semigroups, Fourier transforms, factorization
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , First View , pp. 1 - 6
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The work was supported by SERC grant under MATRICS MTR/2022/000429.

References

Bader, U., Caprace, P. E., Gelander, T. and Mozes, S., ‘Lattices in amenable groups’, Fund. Math. 246(3) (2019), 217–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, U. and Willis, G., ‘Contraction groups and scales of automorphisms of totally disconnected locally compact groups’, Israel J. Math. 142 (2004), 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glöckner, H. and Raja, C. R. E., ‘Expansive automorphisms of totally disconnected, locally compact groups’, J. Group Theory 20 (2017), 589–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, F. P., Moskowitz, M. and Preiss-Rothschild, L., ‘Unbounded conjugacy classes in Lie groups and location of central measures’, Acta Math. 132 (1974), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, F. P., Moskowitz, M. and Preiss-Rothschild, L., ‘Compactness of certain homogeneous spaces of finite volume’, Amer. J. Math. 97 (1975), 248–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, H., Probability Measures on Locally Compact Groups, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 94 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin–New York, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, R. G., ‘ ${\mathrm{FC}}^{-}$ -elements in totally disconnected groups and automorphisms of infinite graphs’, Math. Scand. 92 (2003), 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostow, G. D., ‘Homogeneous spaces with finite invariant measure’, Ann. of Math. (2) 75 (1962), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tits, J., ‘Automorphismes à déplacement borné des groupes de Lie’, Topology 3 (1964), 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, G. A., ‘Tidy subgroups for commuting automorphisms of totally disconnected groups: an analogue of simultaneous triangularisation of matrices’, New York J. Math. 10 (2004), 1–35.Google Scholar