Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:20:35.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Completely Additive Liftings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

Ilijas Farah
Ilijas Farah*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, York University, North York, on, CanadaM3J 1P3 Matematicki Institut, Kneza Mikaila 35 11000 Beograd, Yugoslavia, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this communication is to survey a theory of liftings, as developed in author's thesis ([8]). The first result in this area was Shelah's construction of a model of set theory in which every automorphism of P(ℕ)/ Fin, where Fin is the ideal of finite sets, is trivial, or inother words, it is induced by a function mapping integers into integers ([33]). (It is a classical result of W. Rudin [31] that under the Continuum Hypothesis there are automorphisms other than trivial ones.) Soon afterwards, Velickovic ([47]), was able to extract from Shelah's argument the fact that every automorphism of P(ℕ)/ Fin with a Baire-measurable lifting has to be trivial. This, for instance, implies that in Solovay's model ([36]) all automorphisms are trivial. Later on, an axiomatic approach was adopted and Shelah's conclusion was drawn first from the Proper Forcing Axiom (PFA) ([34]) and then from the milder Open Coloring Axiom (OCA) and Martin's Axiom (MA) ([48], see §5 for definitions). Both shifts from the quotient P(ℕ)/ Fin to quotients over more general ideals P(ℕ)/I and from automorphisms to arbitrary ho-momorphisms were made by Just in a series of papers ([14]-[17]), motivated by some problems in algebra ([7, pp. 38–39], [43, I.12.11], [45, Q48]) and topology ([46, p. 537]).

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 37 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Boppana, R. B. and Sipser, M., The complexity of finite functions, Handbook of theoretical computer science (van Leeuwen, J., editor), Elsevier, 1990, pp. 757–804.Google Scholar
[2] Christensen, J. P. R., Some results with relation to the control measure problem, Vector measures and applications, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 644, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 125–158.Google Scholar
[3] Comfort, W. W. and Negrepontis, S., Theory of ultrafilters, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974.Google Scholar
[4] Dow, A. and Hart, K. P., ω* has (almost) no continuous images, preprint, 1997.Google Scholar
[5] Dow, A., Simon, P., and Vaughan, J. E., Strong homology and the proper forcing axiom, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 106 (1989), no. 3, pp. 821–828.Google Scholar
[6] Engelking, R., General topology, Heldermann, Berlin, 1989.Google Scholar
[7] Erdös, P., My Scottish book “problems”, The Scottish book (Mauldin, D., editor), Birkhäuser, Boston, 1981, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar
[8] Farah, I., Analytic ideals and their quotients, Ph.D. thesis , University of Toronto, 1997.Google Scholar
[9] Farah, I., Analytic quotients, submitted, 1997.Google Scholar
[10] Farah, I., Approximate homomorphisms, submitted, 1997.Google Scholar
[11] Hjorth, G. and Kechris, A., New dichotomies for Borel equivalence relations, this Bulletin, vol. 3 (1997), pp. 329–346.Google Scholar
[12] Jalali-Naini, S.-A., The monotone subsets of Cantor space, filters and descriptive set theory, Doctoral dissertation, Oxford, 1976.Google Scholar
[13] Just, W., Nowhere dense P-subsets of ω*, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 106 (1989), pp. 1145–1146.Google Scholar
[14] Just, W., The space (ω*)n+1 is not always a continuous image of (ω*)n , Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 132 (1989), pp. 59–72.Google Scholar
[15] Just, W., Repercussions on a problem of Erdős and Ulam about density ideals, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 42 (1990), pp. 902–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Just, W., A modification of Shelah's oracle chain condition with applications, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 329 (1992), pp. 325–341.Google Scholar
[17] Just, W., A weak version of AT from OCA, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications (1992), no. 26, pp. 281–291.Google Scholar
[18] Just, W. and Krawczyk, A., On certain Boolean algebras P(ω)/I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 285 (1984), pp. 411–429.Google Scholar
[19] Kalton, N. J., The Maharam problem, Séminaire Initiation à ĺ Analyse, vol. 18 (1988–1989), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
[20] Kalton, N. J. and Roberts, J. W., Uniformly exhaustive submeasures andnearly additive set functions, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 278 (1983), pp. 803–816.Google Scholar
[21] Kechris, A. S., Rigidity properties of Borel ideals on the integers, Topology and its Applications, to appear.Google Scholar
[22] Kechris, A. S. and Louveau, A., The structure of hypersmooth Borel equivalence relations, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 215–242.Google Scholar
[23] Kunen, K., 〈κ, λ*#x232A;-gaps under MA, preprint, 1976.Google Scholar
[24] Louveau, A., Progres recents sur le probleme de Maharam d'apres N. J. Kalton et J. W. Roberts, Séminaire Initiation à ĺ Analyse, vol. 20 (1983–1984), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
[25] Louveau, A. and Velickovic, B., A note on Borel equivalence relations, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 120 (1994), pp. 255–259.Google Scholar
[26] Mardesic, S. and Prasolov, A., Strong homology is not additive, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 307 (1988), pp. 725–744.Google Scholar
[27] Mathias, A. R. D., A remark on rare filters, Infinite and finite sets (Hajnal, A. et al., editors), Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, no. 10, North-Holland, 1975.Google Scholar
[28] Maztjr, K., Fσ-ideals and ω1ω1*-gaps in the Boolean algebra P(ω)/I, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 138 (1991), pp. 103–111.Google Scholar
[29] Maztjr, K., A modification of Louveau and Velickovic construction for Fσ -ideals, preprint, 1996.Google Scholar
[30] Parovičenko, I.I., A universal bicompact of weight ℵ1 , Soviet Mathematics Doklady, vol. 4 (1963), pp. 592–592.Google Scholar
[31] Rudin, W., Homogeneity problems in the theory of Čech compactifications, Duke Mathematics Journal, vol. 23 (1956), pp. 409–419.Google Scholar
[32] Scheepers, M., Gaps in ωω , Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, vol. 6 (1993), pp. 439–561.Google Scholar
[33] Shelah, S., Proper forcing, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 940, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
[34] Shelah, S. and Steprans, J., PFA implies all automorphisms are trivial, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 104 (1988), pp. 1220–1225.Google Scholar
[35] Solecki, S., Analytic ideals, this Bulletin, vol. 2 (1996), pp. 339–348.Google Scholar
[36] Solovay, R., A model of set theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 92 (1970), pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
[37] Talagrand, M., Compacts de fonctions mesurables et filters nonmesurables, Studia Mathematica, vol. 67 (1980), pp. 13–43.Google Scholar
[38] Todorcevic, S., The first derived limit and compactly Fσ-sets, Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, to appear.Google Scholar
[39] Todorcevic, S., Gaps in analytic quotients, Fundamenta Mathematicae, to appear.Google Scholar
[40] Todorcevic, S., Partition problems in topology, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1989.Google Scholar
[41] Todorcevic, S., Analytic gaps, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 150 (1996), pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
[42] Todorcevic, S., Definable ideals and gaps in their quotients, preprint, 1997.Google Scholar
[43] Ulam, S. M., Problems in modern mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, 1964.Google Scholar
[44] Ulam, S. M. and Mauldin, D., Mathematical problems and games, Advances in Applied Mathematics, vol. 8 (1987), pp. 281–344.Google Scholar
[45] van Douwen, E., Monk, D., and Rubin, M., Some questions about Boolean algebras, Algebra Universalis, vol. 11 (1980), pp. 220–243.Google Scholar
[46] van Mill, J., An introduction to βω, Handbook of set-theoretic topology (Kunen, K. and Vaughan, J., editors), North-Holland, 1984, pp. 503–568.Google Scholar
[47] Velickovic, B., Definable automorphisms of P(ω)/ Fin, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 96 (1986), pp. 130–135.Google Scholar
[48] Velickovic, B., OCA and automorphisms of P(ω)/ Fin, Topology and its Applications, vol. 49 (1992), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar