Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:51:20.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in Y chromosome meiotic drive in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): a potential genetic approach to mosquito control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. O. Owusu-Daaku ,
R. J. Wood  and
R. D. Butler
K. O. Owusu-Daaku
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT
R. J. Wood*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT
R. D. Butler
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT
*
† Author for correspondence.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reciprocal crosses between strains of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) from different geographical areas have revealed an unexpectedly complex pattern of holandrically inherited male biased sex ratios in F2. The variation has been interpreted in terms of a web of X–Y interactions in Fl, in which the Y chromosome may or may not show meiotic drive against the X chromosome with which it is paired. The pattern of inheritance is not in agreement with a single form of Y chromosome, driving with different degrees of intensity against Xs of different sensitivity, but indicates different forms of driving Y chromosome. A rule has emerged that if Fl males from any cross give rise to a male distorted sex ratio in their progeny (F2), the males from the reciprocal cross give rise to a normal sex ratio. All eleven newly colonized strains from Ghana showed Y meiotic drive against the Xs of five strains, one of American and four of Australian origin, although one of the eleven showed a greater degree of drive than the other ten against the same sensitive strains. The variation observed is discussed in relation to previous studies on meiotic drive by the MD haplotype, and to the possible exploitation of sex ratio distortion in controlling this potentially dangerous insect.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 87 , Issue 6 , December 1997 , pp. 617 - 623
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apostol, B.L., Black, W.C. IV, Reiter, P. & Miler, B.R. (1996) Population genetics with RAPD-PCR markers: the breeding structure of Aedes aegypti in Puerto Rico. Heredity 76, 325–334.Google Scholar
Craig, G.B., Vandehey, R.C. & Hickey, W.A. (1961) Genetic variability in populations of Aedes aegypti. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 24, 527–539.Google ScholarPubMed
Crampton, J.M., Warren, A., Lycette, G.J., Hughes, M.A., Comley, I.P. & Eggleston, P. (1994) Genetic manipulation of insect vectors as a strategy for the control of vector borne disease. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 88, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C.F. (1994) The case for malaria control by genetic manipulation of its vectors Parasitology Today 10, 371–374.Google Scholar
Hackstein, J.H.P. (1987) Spermatogenesis in Drosophila, pp. 63–116. in Hennig, W. (Ed.) Spermatogenesis Genetic Aspects. 1st edn.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hickey, W.A. & Craig, G.B. (1966a) Distortion of sex ratio in populations of Aedes aegypti. Journal of Genetical Cytology 8, 260–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, W.A. & Craig, G.B. (1966b) Genetic distortion of sex ratio in a mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Genetics 53, 1177–1196.Google Scholar
Lyttle, T.W. (1991) Segregation disorders. Annual Review of Genetics 25, 511–557.Google Scholar
Owusu-Daaku, K.O. (1994) Spermiogenesis and meiotic drive in some tropical mosquitoes. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Suguna, J.G., Wood, R.J., Curtis, C.F., Whitelaw, A. & Kazmi, S.J. (1977) Resistance to meiotic drive at the MD locus in an Indian wild population of Aedes aegypti. Genetic Research 29, 123–132.Google Scholar
Tesfamariam, T. (1993) Analysis of the sex ratio and related biology in laboratory strain of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus), Anopheles gambiae (Giles) and Anopheles arabienses (Patton). PhD Dissertation. University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Wood, R.J. (1961) Biological and genetical studies on sex ratio in DDT resistant and susceptible strains of Aedes aegypti Linnaeus. Genetica Agraria 13, 287–307.Google Scholar
Wood, R.J. (1962a) Some observations on sex ratio on the frequency of the larval mutant ‘yellow’ in Aedes aegypti with particular reference to selection for early and late population. Genetica Agraria 16, 15–26.Google Scholar
Wood, R.J. (1962b) A preliminary note on sex ratio and hatching-response in eggs of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 56, 356–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, R.J. (1968) Heterogeneity in the Trinidad DDT-resistant strain and the QS susceptible strain of Aedes aegypti L. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 39, 639–645.Google ScholarPubMed
Wood, R.J. (1976) Between-family variation in sex-ratio in the Trinidad (T-30) strain of Aedes aegypti (L) indicating differences in sensitivity to the meiotic drive gene MD. Genetica 46, 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R.J. & Newton, M.E. (1991) Sex ratio distortion caused by meotic drive in mosquitos. The American Naturalist 137, 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R.J. & Ouda, N.A. (1987) The genetic basis of resistance and sensitivity to the meiotic drive genes D in the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L). Genetica 72, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.I. (1993) Genes that violate Mendel's rules – The meiotic drive systems. Evolutionary consequences of genomic flux. Recorded contribution to a symposium and abstract. p. 93 in Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Genetics.15–21 August 1993,Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar