Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:17:15.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in tospovirus transmission between populations of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

F. van de Wetering
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Binnenhaven 11, 6709 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. van der Hoek
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Binnenhaven 11, 6709 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
R. Goldbach
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Binnenhaven 11, 6709 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
C. Mollema
Affiliation:
Department of Research Strategy (DLO), PO Box 59, 6700 AB Wageningen, The Netherlands
D. Peters*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Binnenhaven 11, 6709 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
* Fax: +317 484820 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Fourteen populations of the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande, originating from different hosts and countries in Asia, Europe, North America and New Zealand, were analysed for their competency and efficiency to transmit tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV). All populations acquired and subsequently transmitted the virus, and were thus competent to transmit. They show marked differences in their efficiency, expressed as the percentage of transmitting adults. Efficiencies varied from 18% for a F. occidentalis population from the USA (US2) to 75% for a population from Israel (IS2). The differences between populations were not affected by the amount of virus ingested or by the host plant used. However, the tospovirus species studied and age at which the larvae acquired the virus affected the efficiency to transmit. First instar larvae of the NL3 population from The Netherlands were able to acquire tomato spotted wilt virus, whereas second instar larvae failed to do so. However, both instars of this population acquired impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV), another tospovirus. This and tomato spotted wilt virus were both acquired by both larval stages of the populations IS2 and US2, although their ability to acquire virus decreased with their age. Hence, it is likely that, in general, both instar larvae of most F. occidentalis populations are competent to acquire both tospoviruses. These results show that large differences exist in the efficiency by which tomato spotted wilt is transmitted by the various F. occidentalis populations and that the ability to acquire tospovirus decreases with the age of the larvae

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1993) Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). Distribution maps of pests, no. 538. Institute of Entomology, CAB International.Google Scholar
Ammar, E.D. (1994) Propagative transmission of plant and animal viruses by insects: factors affecting vector specificity and competence. Advanced Diseases in Vector Research 10, 289331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, A.C. & Gawell, N.J. (1993) Determining whitefly species. Science 261, 13331334.Google Scholar
Bedford, I.D., Briddon, R.W., Jones, P., Alkaff, N. & Markham, P.G. (1992) Bemisia tabaci – biotype characterisation and the threat of this whitefly species to agriculture. Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pests and Diseases 3, 12351240.Google Scholar
Bedford, I.D., Briddon, R.W., Markham, P.G., Brown, J.K. & Rosell, R.C. (1993) A new species of Bemisia or biotype of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) as a future pest of European agriculture. Plant Health and the European Single Market, Brighton Crop Protection Conference Monograph 54, 381386.Google Scholar
Bedford, I.D., Briddon, R.W., Brown, J.K., Rosell, R.C. & Markham, P.G. (1994) Geminivirus transmission and biological characterisation of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotypes from different geographic regions. Annals of Applied Biology 125, 311325.Google Scholar
Brødsgaard, H.F. (1989) Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) – a new pest in Danish greenhouses. A review. Tidsskrift foer Planteavl 93, 8391.Google Scholar
Brødsgaard, H.F. (1994) Insecticide resistance in European and African strains of western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) tested in a new residue-on-glass test. Journal of Economic Entomology 87, 11411146.Google Scholar
Brown, J.K., Coats, S.A., Bedford, I.D., Markham, P.G. & Bird, J. (1992) Biotypical characterisation of Bemisia tabaci isolates based on esterase profiles, DNA fingerprinting, virus transmission and bioassays to key host plant species. Phytopathology 82, 1104.Google Scholar
Byrne, F.J. & Devonshire, A.L. (1993) Insensitive acetylphism in susceptible and resistant isolates of the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.). Pesticide Physiology 45, 3442.Google Scholar
Campbell, B.C., Duffus, J.E. & Baumann, P. (1993) Determining whitefly species. Science 261, 1333.Google Scholar
Clark, M.F. & Adams, A.N. (1977) Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology 34, 475483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dal Bó, E., Ronco, L., Alippi, A.M. & Fernández, R. (1995) Tomato spotted wilt virus on chrysanthemum in Argentina. Plant Disease 79, 538.Google Scholar
Daughtrey, M.L., Jones, R.K., Moyer, J.W., Daub, M.E. & Baker, J.R. (1997) Tospoviruses strike the greenhouse industry, INSV has become a major pathogen on flower crops. Plant Disease 81, 12201230.Google Scholar
de Ávila, A.C., Huguenot, C., Resende, R. de O., Kitajima, E.W., Goldbach, R.W. & Peters, D. (1990) Serological differentiation of 20 isolates of tomato spotted wilt virus. Journal of General Virology 71, 28012807.Google Scholar
de Ávila, A.C., De Haan, P., Kormelink, R., Resende, R., de, O., Goldbach, R.W. & Peters, D. (1992) Characterization of a distinct isolate of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) from Impatiens sp. in the Netherlands. Journal of Phytopathology 134, 133151.Google Scholar
de Kogel, W.J., van der Hoek, M. & Mollema, C. (1997) Variation in performance of western flower thrips populations on susceptible and partially resistant cucumber. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83, 7380.Google Scholar
German, T.L., Ullman, D.E. & Moyer, J.W. (1992) Tospoviruses: diagnosis, molecular biology, phylogeny, and vector relationships. Annual Review of Phytopathology 30, 315348.Google Scholar
Gillings, M.R., Rae, D., Herron, G.A. & Beattie, G.A.C. (1995) Tracking thrips populations using DNA-based methods. pp. 97103 in Proceedings 1995 Australia and New Zealand Thrips Workshop: Methods, Biology, Ecology and Management.Google Scholar
Goldbach, R. & Peters, D. (1994) Possible causes of the emergence of tospovirus diseases. Seminars of Virology 5, 113120.Google Scholar
Kormelink, R., Peters, D. & Goldbach, R. (1998) Tospovirus genus. Descriptions of Plant Viruses, No. 363, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Law, M.D. & Moyer, J.W. (1990) A tomato spotted wilt-like virus with serologically distinct N protein. Journal of General Virology 73, 21252128.Google Scholar
McGrath, P.F. & Harrison, P.D. (1995) Transmission of tomato leaf curl geminiviruses by Bemisia tabaci: effects of virus isolate and biotype. Annals of Applied Biology 126, 307316.Google Scholar
Moulton, D. (1931) Western Thysanoptera of economic importance. Journal of Economic Entomology 24, 10311036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, T., Inoue-Nagata, A.K., Smid, H.M., Goldbach, R. & Peters, D. (1999) Tissue tropism related to vector competence of Frankliniella occidentalis for tomato spotted wilt tospovirus. Journal of General Virology 80, 507515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perring, T.M., Cooper, A.D., Rodriguez, R.J., Farrar, C.A. & Bellows, T.S. (1993a) Identification of a whitefly species by genomic and behavioral studies. Science 259, 7477.Google Scholar
Perring, T.M., Farrar, C.A., Cooper, A.D. & Bellows, T.S. (1993b) Determining whitefly species. Science 261, 13341335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, D., Wijkamp, I., van de Wetering, F. & Goldbach, R. (1996) Vector relations in the transmission and epidemiology of tospoviruses. Acta Horticulturae 431, 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, D., Loomans, A., Nagata, T., Wijkamp, I. & van de Wetering, F. (1997) Methods to rear and maintain thrips in tospovirus transmission studies. pp. 152159 in Proceedings 1997 Invertebrate in Captivity Conference, July 31–August 3, 1997, Tuscon, Arizona.Google Scholar
Pittman, H.A. (1927) Spotted wilt of tomatoes. Journal of the Australian Council for Science and Industrial Research 1, 7477.Google Scholar
Resende, R. de O., de Ávila, A.C., Goldbach, R.W. & Peters, D. (1991) Comparison of polyclonal antisera in the detection of tomato spotted wilt virus using double antibody sandwich and cocktail ELISA. Journal of Phytopathology 132, 4656.Google Scholar
Rijpkema, J.J.M. (1993) Statistiek met Statgraphics. 271 pp. Schoonhoven, the Netherlands, Academic Service.Google Scholar
Robb, K.L., Newman, J., Virzi, J.K. & Parrella, M.P. (1995) Insecticide resistance in the western flower thrips. pp. 341346in Parker, B.L., Skinner, M. & Lewis, T. (Eds) Thrips biology and management. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Saxena, R.C. & Barrion, A.A. (1987) Biotypes of insect pests of agricultural crops. Insect Science and its Application 8, 453458.Google Scholar
Schulman, R.S. (1992) Statistics in plain English with computer applications. 483 pp. New York, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Sylvester, E.S. (1980) Circulative and propagative virus transmission by aphids. Annual Review of Entomology 25, 257286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashiro, H. (1967) Selfwatering acrylic cages for confining insects and mites and detached leaves. Journal of Economical Entomology 60, 354356.Google Scholar
Todd, J.W., Culbreath, A.K. & Brown, S.L. (1996) Dynamics of vector populations and progress of tomato spotted wilt disease relative to insecticide use in peanuts. Acta Horticulturae 431, 483490.Google Scholar
Ullman, D.E., German, T.L., Sherwood, J.L., Westcot, D.M. & Cantone, F.A. (1993) Tospovirus replication in insect vector cells: immunocytochemical evidence that the nonstructural protein encoded by the S RNA of tomato spotted wilt tospovirus is present in thrips vector cells. Phytopathology 83, 456463.Google Scholar
van de Wetering, F., Goldbach, R. & Peters, D. (1996) Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus ingestion by first instar larvae of Frankliniella occidentalis is a prerequisite for transmission. Phytopathology 86, 900905.Google Scholar
Webb, S., Tsai, J. & Mitchell, F. (1998) Bionomics of Frankliniella bispinosa and its transmission of tomato spotted wilt virus. p. 67in Peters, D. & Goldbach, R. (Eds) Recent progress in tospovirus and thrips research. Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wijkamp, I. & Peters, D. (1993) Determination of the median latent period of two tospoviruses in Frankliniella occidentalis, using a novel leaf disk assay. Phytopathology 83, 986991.Google Scholar
Wijkamp, I., Van Lent, J., Kormelink, R., Goldbach, R. & Peters, D. (1993) Multiplication of tomato spotted wilt virus in its insect vector, Frankliniella occidentalis. Journal of General Virology 74, 341349.Google Scholar
Wijkamp, I., Almarza, N., Goldbach, R. & Peters, D. (1995) Distinct levels of specificity in thrips transmission of tospoviruses. Phytopathology 85, 10691074.Google Scholar
Zhao, G., Liu, W., Brown, J.M. & Knowles, C.O. (1995) Insecticide resistance in field and laboratory strains of western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 88, 11641170.Google Scholar