Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T22:32:55.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tsetse Fly in Southern Rhodesia, 1918

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Rupert W. Jack
Rupert W. Jack
Affiliation:
Entomologist, Department of Agriculture, Rhodesia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of tsetse-fly in Southern Rhodesia up to the present year (1918) continues on the whole to be one of expansion, although on the other hand one small, but important, belt appears to have become extinct. In addition, a fly area in the Moçambique Company's territory has extended up to our eastern border, with the result that serious losses of cattle from trypanosomiasis have occurred on the farms in that region. Detailed reports on the advance or retrogression of Glossina morsitans in other parts of Africa appear to be lacking, and it is felt that in view of the position of this territory in relation to tsetse-fly a review of the situation to the present day may not be without general interest.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , October 1919 , pp. 71 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 71 note * Bull. Ent. Res. v, Sept. 1914, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar

page 72 note * On the authority of the late Mr. Val Gielgud, formerly Native Commissioner for this district.

page 72 note † In 1868 James Chapman remarked on the absence of fly on the south bank of the Zambesi between the Gwaai confluence and a point a few miles below the Sebungwe River confluence, a distance of about 30 miles. This strip contains no game except a small variety of duiker.—“Monograph of the Tsetse Flies,” E. A. Austen, p. 143.

page 76 note * Author's italics.

page 79 note * Bull. Ent. Res., ii., p. 357.Google Scholar

page 79 note † Bull. Ent. Res. v, p. 58.Google Scholar

page 79 note ‡ Bull. Ent. Res., vii., pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

page 79 note § Bull. Ent. Res., v., p. 58.Google Scholar

page 80 note * An exception occurred during the present year (1918), apparently due to the phenomenally heavy rains of last season, the gusu forest being generally two months ahead of its usual time. The mopani, however, was not affected.

page 82 note * Bull. Ent. Res. v, p. 60. and vii, p. 67–71.Google Scholar

page 84 note * [Lloyd, Bull. Ent. Res. iii, p. 236.—of 52 flies containing blood, the nature of the blood cells could be recognised in only 20; of these, 5 contained non-mammalian nucleated cells.—Ed.]