Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:37:45.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A theoretical examination of the classical theory of inheritance of insecticide resistance and the genetics of time to knockdown and dry body weight in Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Graham J. Holloway
Graham J. Holloway
Affiliation:
Population Biology Laboratory, Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berks., RG6 2AJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the decline in production of new insecticides, the development of resistance is likely to become more of a problem than at present. Models of the spread of resistance genes may become integral parts of many management programmes. A critical examination is made of the classical theory of inheritance of resistance, i.e. the spread of a single resistance- conferring allele through a population. The theoretical considerations suggest that simple Mendelian inheritance is unable always to account for the development of resistance. It is suggested that some resistance factors may be under multigenic control and that such inheritance could account for the rate at which resistance sometimes develops. Following on from the theory, an analysis was made of time to knockdown and dry body weight in Sitophilus oryzae (L.). A half-sib experimental design was employed which enabled quantitative analyses of the characters to be made. Both characters had substantial heritabilities and were phenotypically correlated. The analysis also indicated a positive genetic correlation between the characters. The implications for the development of tolerance in the light of the genetic analysis are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , December 1986 , pp. 661 - 670
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, M. L. (1960). Radiosensitivity at specific autosomal loci in mature sperm and spermatogonial cells of Drosophila melanogaster.—Genetics 45, 1019–1022.Google Scholar
Anon. (1974). Recommended methods for the detection and measurement of resistance of agricultural pests to pesticides. Tentative method for adults of some major beetle pests of stored cereals with malathion or lindane—FAO method no. 15.—Pl. Prot. Bull. F.A.O. 22, 127–137.Google Scholar
Becker, W. A. (1967). Manual of quantitative genetics.—2nd edn, 130 pp. Washington, State Univ.Google Scholar
Bonnier, G. & Lüning, K. G. (1949). Studies on X-ray mutations in the white and forked loci of Drosophila melanogaster. I.A statistical analysis of mutation frequencies.—Hereditas 35, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J. C. (1974). An introduction to animal breeding.—76 pp. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. & Pal, R. (1971). Insecticide resistance in arthropods.—Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no.38, 491 pp.Google Scholar
Champ, B. R. & Dyte, C. E. (1976). Report of the FAO global survey of pesticide susceptibility of stored grain pests.—297 pp. Rome, FAO (FAO Plant Production and Protection Series no. 5).Google Scholar
Crow, J. F. (1957). Genetics of insect resistance to chemicals.—A. Rev. Ent. 2, 227–246.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F., Cook, L. M. & Wood, R. J. (1978). Selection for and against insecticide resistance and possible methods of inhibiting the evolution of resistance in mosquitoes.—Ecol. Entomol. 3, 273–287.Google Scholar
Davidson, G. (1958). The practical implications of studies on insecticide resistance in anopheline mosquitoes.—Indian J. Malar. 12, 413–422.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1981). Introduction to quantitative genetics.—2nd edn, 340 pp. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1928). The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations.—Am. Nat. 62, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection.—Oxford, Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, S. H. (1961). Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 35, 82–83.Google Scholar
Georghiou, G. P. & Mellon, R. B. (1983). Pesticide resistance in time and space.—pp. 1–46 in Georghiou, G. P. & Sanito, T.(Eds.). Pest resistance to pesticides.—809 pp. New York, Plenum.Google Scholar
Heather, N. W. (1979). Aspects of the biology of malathion resistant Sitophilus oryzae.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Holloway, G. J. (1984). Genetic differentiation and life history variation in the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae.—218 pp. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Holloway, G. J. & Smith, R. H. (in press). Sexual selection of body weight in the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).—J. stored Prod. Res.Google Scholar
Longstaff, B. C. & Desmarchelier, J. M. (1983). The effects of the temperature-toxicity relationships of certain pesticides upon the population growth of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).—J. stored Prod. Res. 19, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCuaig, R. D. (1956). Determination of the resistance of locusts to DNC in relation to their weight, age and sex.—Ann. appl. Biol. 44, 634–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickey, G. H. (1954). Visible and lethal mutations in Drosophila.—Am. Nat. 88, 241–255.Google Scholar
Milani, R. (1960). Genetic studies on insecticide-resistant insects.—Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. 2, 75–83.Google Scholar
Muggleton, J. (1983). Relative fitness of malathion-resistant phenotypes of Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. (Coleoptera: Silvanidae).—J. appl. Ecol. 20, 245–254.Google Scholar
Plapp, F. W. Jr, Browning, C. R. & Sharpe, P. J. H. (1979). Analysis of rate of development of insecticide resistance based on simulation of a genetic model.—Environ. Entomol. 8, 494–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O. W. (1947). Observations on grain-weevils, Calandra (Col., Curculionidae). I. General biology and oviposition.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 117, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, K. D.(Ed.) (1953). Insect physiology.—1100 pp. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. (1979). Resistance to pesticides. 1. Resistance of insects to insecticides.—Span 22, 50–52, 87.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, B. (1978). The genesis of diversity.—152 pp. London, Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Stone, B. F. (1972). The genetics of resistance by ticks to acaricides.—Aust. vet. J. 48, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strickberger, M. W. (1968). Genetics.—868 pp. London, Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. E. (1986). Genetics and evolution of resistance to insecticides.—Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 27, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, G. W. (1983). Pesticides, theory and application.—308 pp. San Francisco, Freeman.Google Scholar
Way, M. J. (1954). The effect of body weight on the resistance to insecticides of the last-instar larva of Diataraxia oleracea L., the tomato moth.—Ann. appl. Biol. 41, 77–87.Google Scholar
Wood, R. J. (1961). Selective effects of insecticides on mosquitoes.—Genet. agr. 14, 267–287.Google Scholar
Wood, R. J. (1981). Insecticide resistance: genes and mechanisms.—pp. 53–96 in Bishop, J. A. & Cook, L. M.(Eds.). Genetic consequences of man made change.—409 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar