Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:50:49.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tea green leafhopper, Empoasca vitis, chooses suitable host plants by detecting the emission level of (3Z)-hexenyl acetate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2016

Z.-J. Xin ,
X.-W. Li ,
L. Bian  and
X.-L. Sun
Z.-J. Xin
Affiliation:
Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China
X.-W. Li
Affiliation:
Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China
L. Bian
Affiliation:
Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China
X.-L. Sun*
Affiliation:
Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Hangzhou 310008, China
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 86-571-86650331 Tel: 86-571-86650350 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Green leaf volatiles (GLVs) have been reported to play an important role in the host-locating behavior of several folivores that feed on angiosperms. However, next to nothing is known about how the green leafhopper, Empoasca vitis, chooses suitable host plants and whether it detects differing emission levels of GLV components among genetically different tea varieties. Here we found that the constitutive transcript level of the tea hydroperoxide lyase (HPL) gene CsiHPL1, and the amounts of (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate and of total GLV components are significantly higher in tea varieties that are susceptible to E. vitis (Enbiao (EB) and Banzhuyuan (BZY)) than in varieties that are resistant to E. vitis (Changxingzisun (CX) and Juyan (JY)). Moreover, the results of a Y-tube olfactometer bioassay and an oviposition preference assay suggest that (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate and (Z)-3-hexenol offer host and oviposition cues for E. vitis female adults. Taken together, the two GLV components, (Z)-3-hexenol and especially (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, provide a plausible mechanism by which tea green leafhoppers distinguish among resistant and susceptible varieties. Future research should be carried out to obtain the threshold of the above indices and then assess their reasonableness. The development of practical detection indices would greatly improve our ability to screen and develop tea varieties that are resistant to E. vitis.

Keywords

green leaf volatiles (GLVs)(3Z)-hexenol(3Z)-hexenyl acetatetea varietytea leafhopper
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 107 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 77 - 84
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, I.T., Halitschke, R., Paschold, A., von Dahl, C.C. & Preston, C.A. (2006) Volatile signaling in plant–plant interactions: ‘Talking trees’ in the genomics era. Science 311, 812–815.Google Scholar
Bruinsma, M., IJdema, H., Van Loon, J.J.A. & Dicke, M. (2008) Differential effects of jasmonic acid treatment of Brassica nigra on the attraction of pollinators, parasitoids, and butterflies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 128, 109–116.Google Scholar
Bruinsma, M., Posthumus, M.A., Mumm, R., Mueller, M.J., Van Loon, J.J.A. & Dicke, M. (2009) Jasmonic acid-induced volatiles of Brassica oleracea attract parasitoids: effects of time and dose, and comparison with induction by herbivores. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 2575–2587.Google Scholar
Cai, X.M., Sun, X.L., Dong, W.X., Wang, G.C. & Chen, Z.M. (2014) Herbivore species, infestation time, and herbivore density affect induced volatiles in tea plants. Chemoecology 24, 1–14.Google Scholar
Campbell, C.A.M., Pettersson, J., Pickett, J.A., Wadhams, L.J. & Woodcock, C.M. (1993) Spring migration of damson-hop aphid, Phorodon humuli (Homoptera: Aphididae), and summer host plant-derived semiochemicals released on feeding. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 1569–1576.Google Scholar
Degen, T., Dillmann, C., Marion-Poll, F. & Turlings, T.C.J. (2004) High genetic variability of herbivore-induced volatile emission within a broad range of maize inbred lines. Plant Physiology 135, 1928–1938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delphia, C.M., Rohr, J.R., Stephenson, A.G., De Moraes, C.M. & Mescher, M.C. (2009) Effects of genetic variation and inbreeding on volatile production in a field population of horsenettle. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170, 12–20.Google Scholar
Dicke, M. & Baldwin, I.T. (2010) The evolutionary context for herbivore induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’. Trends in Plant Science 15, 167–175.Google Scholar
Feussner, I. & Wasternack, C. (2002) The lipoxygenase pathway. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53, 275–297.Google Scholar
Gols, R., Bullock, J.M., Dicke, M., Bukovinszky, T. & Harvey, J.A. (2011) Smelling the wood from the trees: non-linear parasitoid responses to volatile attractants produced by wild and cultivated cabbage. Journal of Chemical Ecology 37, 795–807.Google Scholar
Guo, H.F. (2011) Research progress of the major pest of tea-green leafhopper (Empoasca vitis Göthe). Jiangsu Agricultural Science 1, 132–134.Google Scholar
Han, B.Y. & Chen, Z.M. (2002) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of natural enemies to synomones from tea shoots and kairomones from tea aphids, Toxoptera aurantii . Journal of Chemical Ecology 28, 2203–2219.Google Scholar
Hatanaka, A., Kajiwara, T. & Sekiya, J. (1987) Biosynthetic-pathway for C-6-aldehydes formation from linolenic acid in green leaves. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 4, 341–61.Google Scholar
Heil, M. (2008) Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytologist 178, 41–61.Google Scholar
Hoballah, M.E.F., Tamo, C. & Turlings, T.C.J. (2002) Differential attractiveness of induced odors emitted by eight maize varieties for the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris: is quality or quantity important? Journal of Chemical Ecology 5, 951–968.Google Scholar
Jin, S., Sun, X.L., Chen, Z.M. & Xiao, B. (2012) Resistance of different tea cultivars to Empoasca vitis Göthe. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 45, 255–265.Google Scholar
Kallenbach, M., Gilardoni, P.A., Allmann, S., Baldwin, I.T. & Bonaventure, G. (2011) C12 derivatives of the hydroperoxide lyase pathway are produced by product recycling through lipoxygenase-2 in Nicotiana attenuata leaves. New Phytologist 191, 1054–1068.Google Scholar
Kappers, I.F., Verstappen, F.W.A., Luckerhoff, L.L.P., Bouwmeester, H.J. & Dicke, M. (2010) Genetic variation in jasmonic acid- and spider mite-induced plant volatile emission of cucumber accessions and attraction of the predator Phytoseiulus persimilis . Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 500–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kariyat, R.R., Mauck, K.E., De Moraes, C.M., Stephenson, A.G. & Mescher, M.C. (2012) Inbreeding compromises volatile signaling phenotypes and influences tritrophic interactions in horsenettle. Ecology Letters 15, 301–309.Google Scholar
Kigathi, R.N., Weisser, W.W., Veit, D., Gershenzon, J. & Unsicker, S.B. (2013) Plants suppress their emission of volatiles when growing with conspecifics. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39, 537–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kollner, T.G., Held, M., Lenk, C., Hiltpold, I., Turlings, T.C.J., Gershenzon, J. & Degenhardt, J. (2008) A maize (E)-β-caryophyllene synthase implicated in indirect defense responses against herbivores is not expressed in most American maize varieties. Plant Cell 20, 482–494.Google Scholar
Koramutla, M.K., Kaur, A., Negi, M., Venkatachalam, P. & Bhattacharya, R. (2014) Elicitation of jasmonate-mediated host defense in Brassica juncea (L.) attenuates population growth of mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). Planta 1, 177–194.Google Scholar
Liu, S. & Han, B. (2010) Differential expression pattern of an acidic 9/13 lipoxygenase in flower opening and senescence and in leaf response to phloem feeders in the tea plant. BMC Plant Biology 10, 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, Y., Hua, X.Y., Turlings, T.C.J., Cheng, J., Chen, X. & Ye, G. (2006) Differences in induced volatile emissions among rice varieties results in differential attraction and parasitism of Nilaparvata lugens eggs by the parasitoid Anagrus nilaparvatae in the field. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 2375–2387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loughrin, J.H., Manukian, A., Heath, R.R. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1995) Volatiles emitted by different cotton varieties damaged by feeding beet armyworm larvae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 1217–1227.Google Scholar
Michereff, M.F.F., Laumann, R.A., Borges, M., Michereff-Filho, M., Diniz, I.V., Neto, A.L.F. & Moraes, M.C.B. (2011) Volatiles mediating a plant-herbivore-natural enemy interaction in resistant and susceptible soybean cultivars. Journal of Chemical Ecology 37, 273–285.Google Scholar
Otálora-Luna, F., Hammock, J.A., Alessandro, R.T., Lapointe, S.L. & Dickens, J.C. (2009) Discovery and characterization of chemical signals for citrus root weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus . Arthropod-Plant Interactions 3, 63–73.Google Scholar
Proffit, M., Birgersson, G., Bengtsson, M., Reis, J.R.R., Witzgall, P. & Lima, E. (2011) Attraction and oviposition of Tuta absoluta females in response to tomato leaf volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 37, 565–574.Google Scholar
Runyon, J.B., Mescher, M.C. & De Moraes, C.M. (2010) Plant defenses against parasitic plants show similarities to those induced by herbivores and pathogens. Plant Signaling & Behavior 5, 929–931.Google Scholar
Soler, R., Harvey, J.A., Kamp, A.F.D., Vet, L.E.M., van der Putten, W.H. & van Dam, N.M. (2007) Root herbivores influence the behaviour of an aboveground parasitoid through changes in plant-volatile signals. Oikos 116, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, X.L., Wang, G.C., Cai, X.M., Jin, S., Gao, Y. & Chen, Z.M. (2010) The tea weevil, Myllocerinus aurolineatus, is attracted to volatiles induced by conspecifics. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 388–395.Google Scholar
Sun, X.L., Wang, G.C., Gao, Y. & Chen, Z.M. (2012) Screening and field evaluation of synthetic volatile blends attractive to adults of the tea weevil, Myllocerinus aurolineatus . Chemoecology 22, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, X.L., Wang, G.C., Gao, Y., Zhang, X.Z., Xin, Z.J. & Chen, Z.M. (2014) Volatiles emitted from tea plants infested by Ectropis obliqua larvae are attractive to conspecific moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 10, 1080–1089.Google Scholar
Unsicker, S.B., Kunert, G. & Gershenzon, J. (2009) Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12, 479–485.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Li, J.C., Hu, L.F., Zhang, T.F., Zhang, G.R. & Lou, Y.G. (2013) OsMPK3 positively regulates the JA signaling pathway and plant resistance to a chewing herbivore in rice. Plant Cell Reports 7, 1075–1084.Google Scholar
Weaver, D.K., Buteler, M., Hofland, M.L., Runyon, J.B., Nansen, C., Talbert, L.E., Lamb, P. & Carlson, G.R. (2009) Cultivar preferences of ovipositing wheat stem sawflies as influenced by the amount of volatile attractant. Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, I.M., Borden, J.H., Gries, R. & Gries, G. (1996) Green leaf volatiles as antiaggregants for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 10, 1861–1875.Google Scholar
Xin, Z.J., Zhang, L.P., Zhang, Z.Q., Chen, Z.M. & Sun, X.L. (2014 a) A tea hydroperoxide lyase gene, CsiHPL1, regulates tomato defense response against Prodenia Litura (Fabricius) and Alternaria Alternata f. sp. Lycopersici by modulating green leaf volatiles (GLVs) release and jasmonic acid (JA) gene expression. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 32, 62–69.Google Scholar
Xin, Z.J., Zhang, Z.Q., Chen, Z.M. & Sun, X.L. (2014 b) Salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM) negatively mediates tea herbivore-induced direct and indirect defense against the tea geometrid Ectropis oblique. Journal of Plant Research 4, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z.W., Duan, X.N., Jin, S., Li, X.W., Chen, Z.M., Ren, B.Z., Sun, X.L. (2013) Regurgitant derived from the tea geometrid Ectropis oblique suppresses wound-induced polyphenol oxidases activity in tea plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39, 744–751.Google Scholar
Yukio, K. (2000) Influence of injury by tea green leafhopper, Empoasca onukii Matsuda on leaves in new shoots of tea plants. Chagyo Kenkyu Hokoku 88, 1–8.Google Scholar
Zeiss, M.R. & Braber, K.D. (2001) Tea: Integrated Pest Management Ecological Guide. E-book. VietNam, CIDSE.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q.H. & Schlyter, F. (2004) Olfactory recognition and behavioral avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer inhabiting bark beetles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 6, 1–19.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Xin supplementary material

Supplementary Figure

Download Xin supplementary material(Image)
Image 109.3 KB