Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:57:01.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The taxonomy of New World microgastrine braconids (Hymenoptera) parasitic on Diatraea spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. D. Austin  and
P. C. Dangerfield
A. D. Austin
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Waite Agricultural Research Institute (University of Adelaide), Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
P. C. Dangerfield
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Waite Agricultural Research Institute (University of Adelaide), Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The taxonomy of species in the braconid subfamily Microgastrinae that parasitize the larvae of Diatraea in the New World is reviewed and a brief diagnosis of each species provided. Apanteles fredi sp. n. is described from Guatemala and its relationships discussed. Information on the distribution, host associations and range in variation of species is provided, along with a revised and illustrated key to facilitate their identification.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 131 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, M. M., Bennett, F. D. & Carl, K. P. (1971). Biological control of Diatraea saccharalis (F.) in Barbados by Apanteles flavipes Cam. and Lixophaga diatraeae T.T.—Entomophaga 16, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. (1900). Report upon the aculeate Hymenoptera of the islands of St. Vincent and Grenada, with additions to the parasitic Hymenoptera and a list of the described Hymenoptera of the West Indies.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 190, 207–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, F. D. (1971). Current status of biological control of the small moth borers of sugar cane Diatraea spp. (Lep. Pyralididae).—Entomophaga 16, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briceño, S. R. (1982). 600 milhões de parasitos para o controle biológico da cana-de-açúcar no Brazil.—Alcool e Açúcar 2, 32–35.Google Scholar
Cameron, P. (1891). Hymenopterological notices.—Mem. Proc. Manchr. lit. phil. Soc. 4 (iv), 182–194.Google Scholar
CIBC (Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control) (1979). Report of work carried out April 1978–March 1979.—87 pp. Farnham Royal, Slough, Commonw. Agric. Bur.Google Scholar
CIBC (Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control) (1980). Report of work carried out April 1979—March 1980.—78 pp. Farnham Royal, Slough, Commonw. Agric. Bur.Google Scholar
CIE (Commonwealth Institute of Entomology) (1951). Diatraea saccharalis (Fabr.).—Distrib. Maps Insect Pests no. 5.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. W., Huffman, F. R. & Smith, J. W. Jr, (1979). Introduction and establishment of Apanteles flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Diatraea saccharalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) in Texas.—Entomophaga 24, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, J. R. & Mann, G. A. (1967). Biology, rearing and a trial release of Apanteles flavipes in the Florida Everglades to control the sugar cane borer.—J. econ. Ent. 60, 44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, P. M. (1984). A new species of Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from Mexico introduced into Texas to control a sugar cane borer, Eoreuma loftini (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 86, 861–863.Google Scholar
Mason, W. R. M. (1981). The polyphyletic nature of Apanteles Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): a phylogeny and reclassification of Microgastrinae.—Mem. entomol. Soc. Can. no. 115, 147 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1920). A revision of the North American species of ichneumon-flies belonging to the genus Apanteles.—Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 58, 483–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1922). A revision of the North American ichneumon-flies belonging to the subfamilies Neoneurinae and Microgasterinae.—Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 61, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1933). Seven new species of reared Braconidae (Hymenoptera).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 35, 193–200.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1957). New World Apanteles parasitic on Diatraea (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).—Ent. News 68, 19–25.Google Scholar
Nees von Esenbeck, C. G. (1834). Hymenopterorum Ichneumonibus affinium monographiae, genera, Europaea et species illustrantes. Vol. 1.—320 pp. Stuttgart & Tubingen, Cotta.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1965). A reclassification of the tribe Microgasterini (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).—Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent.) suppl. 2, 284 pp.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1968). A revision of the genus Microgaster Latreille (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).—Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent.) 22, 31–72.Google Scholar
Shenefelt, R. D. (1972). Braconidae 4, Microgasterinae, Apanteles. Part 7.—pp. 429–668in van der Vecht, J, & Shenefelt, R. D. (Eds). Hymenopterorum catalogus.—Gravenhage, Junk.Google Scholar
Shenefelt, R. D. (1973). Branconidae 5, Microgasterinae & Ichneutinae. Part 9.—pp. 669–812in van der Vecht, J. & Shenefelt, R. D. (Eds). Hymenopterorum catalogus.—Gravenhage, Junk.Google Scholar
Szépligeti, G. V. (1904). Hymenoptera. Fam. Braconidae.—Genera Insect. fasc. 22b, 79–253.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. (Ed.) (1945). A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests. Section 1. Parasite host catalogue. Part 6. Parasites of the Lepidoptera (CI-F).—pp. 131–258. Belleville, Ontario, Imp. Parasite Serv.Google Scholar
Van Achterberg, C. (1979). A revision of the subfamily Zelinae auct. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).—Tijdschr. Ent. 122, 241–479.Google Scholar
Van Dine, D. L. (1929). Parasites of suger cane moth borers.—J. econ. Ent. 22, 248–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. A. (1984). The status of certain Braconidae (Hymenoptera) cultured for biological control programs, and description of a new species of Macrocentrus.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 86, 902–912.Google Scholar