Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:54:10.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A taxonomic study of the species of Antestiopsis (Hemipteea, Pentatomidae) associated with Coffea arabica in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. J. Greathead
D. J. Greathead
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, c/o Kawanda Research Station, Kampala, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The taxonomy of African species of Antestiopsis, some of which are important pests of coffee, has hitherto been in confusion owing to the difficulty of finding decisive morphological characters. In the present study an attempt is made to clarify the relationships of the coffee pest species and some of their close allies by the use of both biological and morphological characters.

The species of Antestia and Antestiopsis occurring on coffee in Africa are differentiated in a key, and descriptions are given of the following: Antestiopsis orbitalis (Westw.), with three clearly distinguishable subspecies, orbitalis, bech-uana (Kirkaldy) and ghesquierei Carayon, several local colour forms of these, and a few variable populations that cannot be referred definitely to any one of the subspecies; A. intricata (Ghesq. & Carayon); A. facetoides sp.n. for the species hitherto known as “ faceta ” in eastern Kenya and Tanzania; A. crypta, sp.n. confined to Katanga; A. falsa (Schout.), a rare and imperfectly known species; A. lepelleyi sp.n., which does not feed on coffee; and A. littoralis sp.n., from the Kenya coast, known to the writer only from museum specimens.

Evidence for the arrangement adopted is discussed, and the taxonomic value of certain morphological characters is assessed. The distributions presented on maps are discussed, and it is concluded that the activities of man are unlikely to have obscured the natural patterns. A list is given of known host-plants, which, except for those of A. orbitalis orbitalis and form facetus, are with only a single other exception members of the Eubiaceae. The distribution on a local scale and recent changes of abundance of species in competition are discussed, and it is shown that A. orbitalis ghesquierei and A. o. bechuana appear to be spreading at the expense of A. intricata in Uganda and A. facetoides in Tanzania, respectively. Kesults of crossing East African species and forms show that those here regarded as species will not cross but that the subspecies of A. orbitalis will do so, producing intermediates that, when allowed to interbreed, are not as viable as pure strains. Finally an attempt to find morphometrical characters is discussed, and the results are given of a calculation of discriminant functions based on two characters. These, while, not conclusive, support the conclusions drawn from other evidence.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 515 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carayon, J. (1954). Les Antestiopsis (Hemipt. Pentatomidae) du caféier en Afrique tropicale francaise. —Bull. sci. Sect. tech. Agric. trap. no. 5 pp. 363–373.Google Scholar
Carcasson, R. H. (1964). A preliminary survey of the zoogeography of African butterflies. —E. Afr. Wildlife J. 2 pp. 122–157.Google Scholar
Coste, R. (1955). Les caféiers et les cafés dans le monde. Tome premier. Les caféiers. —381 pp. Paris, Ed. Larose.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L. (1892). A naturalist in the Transvaal. —277 pp. London, R. H. Porter.Google Scholar
Fielder, H. G. (1950). Studien zur Biologie und Bekämpfung der Kaffeewanzen (Antestia lineaticollis Stål und faceta Germ.) in Ostafrika. —Z. angew. Ent. 31 pp. 473–99.Google Scholar
Geering, Q. A. (1956). A method for controlled breeding of cotton stainers, Dysdercus spp. (Pyrrhocoridae). —Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 743–746.Google Scholar
Geemar, E. F. (1838). Hemiptera Heteroptera promontorii Bonae Spei nundum descripta, quae collegit C. F. Drège. —Silb. Rev. ent. 5 (1837) pp. 121–192.Google Scholar
Ghesquiere, J. & Carayon, J. (1948). A propos de quelques Antestia et Helopeltis de l' Afrique tropicale (Hemiptera Pentatomidae et Miridae). —Rev. Zool. Bot. afr. 41 pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, H. (1927). Annual report of the government entomologist. —Rep. Dep. Agric. Uganda 1926 pp. 24–27.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, H. (1936). Variegated coffee bug (Antestia spp.) in Uganda. —E. Afr. agric. J. 1 pp. 448–452.Google Scholar
Kirkaldy, G. W. (1900). On Aegaleus bechuana, a new species of Cimicidae, reported to injure coffee-berries in British Central Africa. —Entomologist 33 pp. 77–78.Google Scholar
Kirkaldy, G. W. (1909). Catalogue of the Hemiptera (Heteroptera). Vol. 1. Cimicidae. —392 pp. Berlin, F. L. Dames.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, T. W. (1937). Studies on the ecology of coffee plantations in East Africa. II. The autecology of Antestia spp. (Pentatomidae) with a particular account of a strepsipterous parasite. —Trans. R. ent. Soo. Land. 86 pp. 247–343.Google Scholar
Le Pelley, R. H. (1942). The food and feeding habits of Antestia in Kenya. — Butt. ent. Res. 33 pp. 71–89.Google Scholar
Le Pelley, R. H. (1959). Agricultural insects of East Africa. —307 pp. Nairobi, E. Afr. High Comm.Google Scholar
Leston, D. (1952). Notes on the Ethiopian Pentatomidae (Hem.) 1. The genotype of Antestia Stål. —Rev. Zool. Bot. afr. 45 pp. 268–270.Google Scholar
Lestox, D. (1953). Notes on the Ethiopian Pentatomoidea. X. Some specimens from southern Africa in the South African Museum, with a note on the remarkable pygophore of Elvisura irrorata Spinola and description of a new species of Piezodorus Fieber. —Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 41 pp. 48–60.Google Scholar
Michelmore, A. P. G. (1949). Report on coffee entomology and pathology, 1946–1948. —15 pp. Entebbe, Govt. Printer.Google Scholar
Michelmore, A. P. G. (1950). Report on coffee pests and diseases. —Rec. Invest. Dep. Agric. Uganda no. 1 pp. 31–46.Google Scholar
Schouteden, H. (1912). Notes sur quelques Antestia d'Afrique. —Ann. Soc. ent. Belg. 56 pp. 183–184.Google Scholar
Stål, C. (1854). Nya Hemiptera fran Cafferlandet. —Ofvers. VetenskAkad. Förh., Stockh. 10 (1853) pp. 209–227.Google Scholar
Stål, C. [1864]. Hemiptera afrieana. Tomus Primus. —256 pp. Holmiae, Off. Norstedt.Google Scholar
Stål, C. (1876). Enumeratio Hemipterorum. Bidrag till en förteckning öfver alia hittills kända Hemiptera, jemte systematiska meddelanden 5. Enumeratio Plataspinorum. —K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 14 no. 4, 162 pp.Google Scholar
Stower, W. J., Davies, D. E. & Jones, I. B. (1960). Morphometric studies of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.). —J. Anim. Ecol. 29 pp. 309–339.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. H. C. (1945). Recent investigations of Antestia species in Uganda. — E. Afr. agric. J. 10 pp. 223–233; 11 pp. 47–55.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. (1783). Dissertatio entomologica novas insectorum species. pt. 2, pp. 47–48. Upsaliae.Google Scholar
Thunbekg, C. P. (1822). Dissertatio entomologica de Hemipteris Maxillosis Capensibus, p. 2. Upsaliae.Google Scholar
Turner, J. R. G. (1963). Geographical variation and evolution in the males of the butterfly Papilio dardanus Brown (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). —Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 115 pp. 239–259.Google Scholar
Walker, F. (1867). Catalogue of the specimens of heteropterous Hemiptera in the collection of the British Museum. Part II. Scutata. —pp. 241–417. London, British Museum.Google Scholar
[Westwood, J. O.] (1837). A catalogue of Hemiptera in the collection of the Rev. F. W. Hope, M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S., F.Z.S., M.E.S.. etc., with short Latin descriptions of the new species. —46 pp. London, J. C. Bridgewater.Google Scholar