Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T03:48:19.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic studies on Eulophid parasites (Hym., Chalcidoidea), mostly of coffee leaf-miners in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. J. Kerrich
G. J. Kerrich
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is designed to improve the definition of some Eulophid parasites, mostly of coffee leaf-miners (Leucoptera spp.) and of the web spinner Odites artigena (Meyr.), which are being studied in East Africa. Some of these were previously unknown or without valid names. It is convenient to include a tropicopolitan parasite of Agromyzidae leaf-mining in vegetables and a parasite of a Coleophorid case-bearer from the Bahamas.

In the Elachertine genus Cirrospilus Westw., a key is given for the separation of the African species affecting coffee leaf-miners. These are compared with the European species, and the new species also with its closest American relative. Evidence suggests that the supposed subgeneric divisions cannot be maintained.

In the Eulophinae, Crateulophus Masi is recalled from synonymy and is compared with Sympiesis Först. Relevant species are placed accordingly, and keys are given to species of both genera. A new parasite of Odites is ascribed to Microlycus Thorns., a genus previously known only in continental Europe.

In the Entedontinae, a key is given to the relevant species now placed in Achrysocharis Gir. Derostenus Westw. and some related genera are more closely defined. A new genus is proposed for Derostenus coffeae Ferrière 1936, and a further new genus for another parasite of Leucoptera and its relatives. A recorded but previously unnamed species is placed in Chrysocharis Först., and both this and C. lepelleyi Ferrière are compared with European species of that genus.

The genus Proacrias Ihering 1913, based on the South American species P. coffeae Ihering, has been placed in synonymy with Neochrysocharis Kurdyumov 1912. Attempts to trace the unique type of Perinetia coffeae Risbec 1952 have not met with success.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , October 1969 , pp. 195 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashmead, W. H. (1888). Appendix. Descriptions of some unknown parasitic Hymenoptera in the collection of the Kansas State Agricultural College, received from Prof. E. A. Popenoe.—Bull. Kans. St. agric. Coll. no. 3, p. vii.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W. H. (1904). Classification of the Chalcid flies or the superfamily Chalcidoidea, with descriptions of new species in the Carnegie Museum, collected in South America by Herbert H. Smith.—Mem. Carnegie Mus. 1, no. 4, pp. xxi +225–555. 9 pls.Google Scholar
Askew, R. R. (1968). Hymenoptera. 2. Chalcidoidea. Section 2 (b). Elasmidae and Eulophidae (Elachertinae, Eulophinae, Euderinae).—Handbk. Ident. Br. Insects 8, pt. 2 (b), 39 pp.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1959 a). A study of Central European Eulophidae, I: Eulophinae (Hymenoptera).—Sb. em. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 33, 117–170.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1959 b). A study of Central European Eulophidae, II: Diaulinopsis and Cirrospilus (Hymenoptera).—Sb. ent. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 33, 171–194.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1961). [Notes on the Chalcid fauna (Chalcidoidea) of Moldavian S.S.R.]—Trudý moldav. nauchno-issled. Inst. Sadov. 7, 5–30. Description of Cirrospilus talitzkii in Russian with figure, and in English.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1965 a). Studies of European Eulophidae, IV: Pediobius Walk. and two allied genera (Hymenoptera).—Sb. ent. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 36, 5–90.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1965 b). Synonymic and taxonomic notes on some Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera), with corrections of my own mistakes.—Sb. ent. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 36, 543–554.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. (1965 c). A review of the Chalcidoid fauna of the Moldavian S.S.R., with descriptions of new species (Hymenoptera).—Sb. faun. Prací ent. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 11, 5–37.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. & Askew, R. R. (1968). Index of entomophagous insects. Index of Palearctic Eulophidae (excl. Tetrastichinae). 260 pp. Paris, Le François.Google Scholar
Burks, B. D. (1966). The North American species of Pediobius Walker (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 68, 33–43.Google Scholar
Delucchi, V. (1954). Revision der Chalcidierarten der Gruppe Derostenus-Chrysocharis (Euloph., Entedontinae).—Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 27, 281–305.Google Scholar
Dodd, A. A. (1917). Records and descriptions of Australian Chalcidoidea.—Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 41, 344–368.Google Scholar
Ferrière, C. (1936). The parasites of the coffee leaf-miners (Leucoptera spp.) in Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 27, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrière, C. (1938). Descriptions of some African Eulophidae (Hym., Chalc.). Bull. ent. Res. 29, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerster, A. (1856). Hymenopterologische Studien. II. Heft. Chalcidiae und Proctotrupii. 152 pp. Aachen.Google Scholar
Gahan, A. B. (1941). A revision of the parasitic wasps of the genus Necremnus Thomson (Eulophidae; Hymenoptera).—J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 31, 196–203.Google Scholar
Giard, A. (1903). Sur un moyen de lutte contre les insectes nuisibles à habitat très étendu.—Bull. Sect. Agric. colon. 1, (1901–02), Notes et Mémoires, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. (1913). Diagnoses of new Chalcidoid Hymenoptera from Queensland, Australia.—Arch. Naturgesch. 79, Abt. A Heft 6, 90–107.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. (1916). Australian Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea. General Supplement.—Mem. Qd Mus. 5, 205–230.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. (1917). Notes and descriptions of miscellaneous Chalcid-flies (Hymenoptera).—Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 53, no. 2213, 445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girault, A. A. (1924). Homo perniciosus and new Hymenoptera.—4 pp. Brisbane, privately printed.Google Scholar
Gomes, J. G. (1943). Nota à sistemática de Proacrias coffeae Ihering, 1913 (Chalcidoidea—Entedontidae), parasito de Leucoptera coffeella.—Bolm Soc. bras. Agron. 6, 211–214.Google Scholar
Graham, M. W. R. de V. (1959). Keys to the British genera and species of Elachertinae, Eulophinae, Entedontinae, and Euderinae (Hym., Chalcidoidea).—Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 13, 169–204.Google Scholar
Graham, M. W. R. de V. (1963). Additions and corrections to the British List of Eulophidae (Hym., Chalcidoidea), with descriptions of some new species.—Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 15, 167–275.Google Scholar
von Ihering, R. (1913). Tres Chalcididas parasitas do bicho do cafe, Leucoptera coffeella, com algumas considerações sobre o hyperparasitismo.—Revta Mus. paul. 9, 85–106.Google Scholar
Kurdyumov, N. V. (1912). Hyménoptères-parasites nouveaux ou peu connus.—Rev. russe Ent. 12, 223–240.Google Scholar
Masi, L. (1917). Chalcididae of the Seychelles Islands.—Novit. zool. 24, 121–230.Google Scholar
Masi, L. (1940). Descrizioni di Calcididi raccolti in Somalia dal Prof. G. Russo con note sulle specie congeneri.—Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. Portici 3, 247–324.Google Scholar
Notley, F. B. (1948). The Leucoptera leaf-miners of coffee on Kilimanjaro. I.—Leucoptera coffeella, Guér.—Bull. ent. Res. 39, 339–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risbec, J. (1951). Les Chalcidoïdes d'A.O.F.—Mém. Inst. fr. Afr. noire, no. 13, 409 pp.Google Scholar
Risbec, J. (1952). Contribution à l'étude des Chalcidoïdes de Madagascar.—Mém. Inst. scient. Madagascar (E)2, 449 pp.Google Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. (1909). Hymenoptera fam. Chalcididae.—Genera Insectorum fasc. 97, 1–550, 8 pis.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. (1878). Hymenoptera Scandinaviae. Tom 5, 307 pp. Lund.Google Scholar
Walker, F. (1846). Characters of some undescribed species of Chalcidites (continued).—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (1) 17, 177–185.Google Scholar
Waterston, J. (1915). Notes on African Chalcidoidea—II.—Bull. ent. Res. 5, 343–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, J. (1925). On some Eulophid parasites (Hym., Chalcidoidea) of the oil palm Hispid beetle.—Bull. ent. Res. 15, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, J. O. (1832). Descriptions of several new British forms amongst the parasitic Hymenopterous insects.—Lond. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. Mag. 3, 127–129.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. (1833 a). On the probable number of species of insects in the Creation; together with descriptions of several minute Hymenoptera.—Mag. nat. Hist. 6, 116–123.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. (1833 b). Notice of the habits of a Cynipideous insect, parasitic upon the rose louse (Aphis rosae); with descriptions of several other parasitic Hymenoptera.—Mag. nat. Hist. 6, 491–497.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. (1968). Preliminary studies of the parasites of Cnephasia virgaureana Tr. (Lep.: Tortricidae) and of related species in Middle Europe.—Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control no. 10, 1–22.Google Scholar