Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:40:22.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The susceptibility of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) to insecticide deposits on targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. J. Torr
S. J. Torr
Affiliation:
Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Branch, Department of Veterinary Services, P. O. Box 8283, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were made of the susceptibility of wild-caught females of Glossina pallidipes Austen to deposits of DDT, dieldrin and deltamethrin on cotton canvas and Terylene netting. Aqueous suspensions of 3% dieldrin wettable powder, 3% dieldrin emulsifiable concentrate, 5·0% DDT wettable powder and 0·0625% deltamethrin flowable concentrate, were sprayed on the canvas at 0·36% litre/m2 Over 95% of the flies resting for 45 s on fresh deposits of these insecticides died within 72 h. Deposits of dieldrin, DDT and deltamethrin exposed to the sun during 140 days of the dry season produced mortalities of 100, 0 and 10% compared with 100, 75 and 100% for shaded deposits. The concentration of dieldrin and deltamethrin on exposed canvas was about 1% that on shaded canvas, but dieldrin produced photodieldrin upon exposure to the sun. Flies colliding with Terylene netting that had been immersed in 0·75–6·0% suspensions of dieldrin wettable powder and 0·01–0·1% suspensions of deltamethrin flowable concentrate produced mortalities of 100%. Deltamethrin deposits were resistant to weathering by rain, but dieldrin deposits were not. It is suggested that deltamethrin flowable concentrate should be used during the wet season and that dieldrin wettable powder should be used during the dry season. Dieldrin sprayed on an electrocuting target reduced the catch, but deltamethrin did not.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , September 1985 , pp. 451 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, F. & Hadaway, A. B. (1952). Some factors affecting the availability of contact insecticides.—Bull. ent. Res. 43, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, F., Hadaway, A. B., Flower, L. S. & Turner, C. R. (1979). Residual contact toxicity of some insecticides to tsetse flies in laboratory tests.—Misc. Rep. Centre Overseas Pest Res. no. 46. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R. (1971). A critical review of the techniques for testing insecticides.—2nd edn, 345 pp. Farnham Royal, UK, Commonw. Agric. Bur.Google Scholar
Cuisance, D. & Politzar, H. (1983). Étude sur l'efficacité contre Glossina palpails gambiensis et Glossina tachinoides de barrières constituées d'écrans ou de pièges biconiques imprégnés de D.D.T., de deltaméthrine ou de dieldrine.—Revue Élev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 36, 159–168.Google Scholar
Hadaway, A. B., Barlow, F. & Turner, C. R. (1976 a). The susceptibility of different species of tsetse flies to some insecticides.—Misc. Rep. Centre Overseas Pest Res. no. 23, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Hadaway, A. B., Barlow, F. & Flower, L. S. (1976 b). Penetration of insecticides from solutions into tsetse flies and other insects.—Misc. Rep. Centre Overseas Pest Res. no.22, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Laveissière, C. & Couret, D. (1980). Traps impregnated with insecticide for the control of riverine tsetse flies.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 74, 264–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilson, R. D. (1968). A simple apparatus for exposing tsetse flies to insecticide deposits.—Rhod. J. agric. Res. 6, 109–112.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. G. & Kluge, E. B. (1968). The use of insecticide in arresting an advance of Glossina morsitans Westwood in the south-east lowveld of Rhodesia.—Proc. Trans. Rhod. scient. Ass. 53, 17–33.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1968). Residual insecticides for use against tsetse flies in Rhodesia.—Int. Pest Contr. 10 (4), 12–15.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1974 a). The responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to mobile and stationary baits.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 545–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1974 b). New field methods for studying the responses of tsetse flies (Diptera. Glossinidae) to hosts.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1980). Field studies of the responses of tsetse flies (Glossinidae) and other Diptera to carbon dioxide, acetone and other chemicals.—Bull. ent. Res. 70, 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1983). The effects of odours, wind direction and wind speed on the distribution of Glossina (Diptera: Glossinidae) and other insects near stationary targets.—Bull ent. Res. 73, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. & Hall, D. R. (1985). The use of 1-octen-3-ol, acetone and carbon dioxide to improve baits for tsetse flies, Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 75, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar