Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T11:52:22.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Sex pheromone of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G.V.P. Reddy  and
K.C.D. Urs
G.V.P. Reddy*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
K.C.D. Urs
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
*
G.V.P. Reddy, Agriculture Research Station, HAGARI-583 138, Bellary District, Karnataka, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Marked male moths of Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) released at up to 12 m from a sticky delta trap baited with synthetic pheromone, were caught in significantly higher numbers than moths released at greater distances, both in downwind and upwind directions, from the traps. Maximum catches were obtained when the traps were set at 30 cm above the crop level. Continued exposure of septa in the field led to a progressive reduction in catches, and catches were significantly reduced after 28 days. Newly emerged virgin female moths attracted significantly more male moths than one day old or older virgin female moths. Five day old virgin females attracted no male moths. When virgin females were used as a bait in the field, the peak catch of males was between 1600 and 1800 h. Tests at two field locations revealed that, at the concentration tested, synthetic sex pheromone attracted a similar number of moths to the number attracted by 10 virgin females in delta traps, and significantly more than 8, or fewer virgin females.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 86 , Issue 5 , October 1996 , pp. 585 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, P.B., Shelton, A.M. & Andaloro, J.T. (1982) Monitoring of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) in cabbage with pheromones. Journal of Economic Entomology 75, 1025–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, M.D., Underhill, E.W. & Steck, W.F. (1979) Field trapping of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella using synthetic sex attractants. Environmental Entomology 8, 516–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, Y.S., Lin, Y.M. & Hsu, C.L. (1977) Sex pheromone of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica 16, 99–105.Google Scholar
Chow, Y.S., Wang, C.H., Liu, M.A. & Lin, Y.M. (1984) External morphology of the sensilla of the diamondback moth antenna, with special reference to the difference between male and female. Plant Protection, Taiwan 26, 135–143.Google Scholar
Furlong, M.J., Pell, J.K., Choo, O.P. & Rahman, S.A. (1995) Field and laboratory evaluation of a sex pheromone trap for the autodissemination of the fungal entomopathogen, Zoophthora radicans (Entomophthorales) by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponometidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 85, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, M. & Pawar, A.D. (1989) Monitoring Spodoptera litura in vegetable crops through synthetic sex pheromone traps. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 17, 117–118.Google Scholar
Jayarathanam, K. (1977) Studies on the population dynamics of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) and crop loss due to the pest in cabbage. PhD thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India, 215 pp.Google Scholar
Koshihara, T. & Yamada, H. (1980) Activity of the female sex pheromone of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), and analogue. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 24, 6–12. (in Japanese with English summary).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M.Y. & Sun, C.N. (1984) Rearing diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) on rape seedlings by a modification of the Koshihara and Yamada method. Journal of Economic Entomology 75, 153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawar, C., Sithanantham, S., Bhatnagar, V.S., Srivastava, C.P. & Reed, W. (1988) The development of sex pheromone trapping of Heliothis armigera at ICRISAT, India. Tropical Pest Management 34, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivnick, K.A., Jarvis, B.J., Gillott, C., Slater, G.P. & Underhill, E.W. (1990) Daily patterns of reproductive activity and the influence of adult density and exposure to host plants on reproduction in the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Environmental Entomology 19, 587–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, G.V.P. (1990) Studies with sex pheromones in the management of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), PhD thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. 196 pp.Google Scholar
Reddy, G.V.P. & Urs, K.C.D. (In press) Comparative performance of five types of traps for sex trapping of diamondback moth in cole crops. Journal of Insect Science.Google Scholar
Salinas, P.J. (1972) Studies on the ecology and behaviour of the larvae of Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). PhD thesis, University of London, 357 pp.Google Scholar
Talekar, N.S. (1992) Diamondback moth and other crucifer pests. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop,Tainan, AVRDC, Raiwan.603 pp.Google Scholar
Tamaki, Y., Kawasaki, K., Yamada, H., Koshihara, T., Osaki, N., Ando, T., Yoshida, S. & Kakinihana, H. (1977) (Z)-11-Hexadecenyl and (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate: Sex pheromone components of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 12, 208–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar