Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:41:42.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Chemical Control of Cacao Mirids, Distantiella theobroma (Dist.) and Sahlbergella singularis Hagl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

F. Raw
F. Raw
Affiliation:
West African Cocoa Research Institute, Tafo, Ghana.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Laboratory and field tests were made to investigate the toxicity, mode of action and persistence of technical DDT and γ BHC when applied to cacao in Ghana to control the Mirids, Distantiella theobroma (Dist.) and Sahlbergella singularis Hagl. The insecticides were tested at concentrations previously used in field trials. D. theobroma, S. singularis and Tribolium castaneum (Hbst.) were used as test insects. Preliminary tests with aldrin, chlordane and dieldrin were also made.

Cacao pods were sprayed to drip point with the test insecticides and the deposit was allowed to dry. Mirid nymphs were placed on the pods and the rate of knockdown and the mortality after exposure for a test period was recorded. These tests showed that BHC had a higher toxicity and acted much more quickly than DDT. BHC greatly reduced feeding.

Fumigant action was tested by spraying cacao leaves to drip point with the test insecticides, allowing the deposit to dry, and then exposing Mirid nymphs and adults over discs cut from the leaves. BHC had a powerful but transient fumigant action; adults, fifth- and second-instar nymphs were killed after, respectively, ½, 4 and 3 hours’ exposure at 28–30°C. over leaves treated with 0·25 per cent, γ BHC. No fumigant effect was observed after prolonged exposure over leaves treated with 2·5 per cent, technical DDT.

Persistence was studied by treating cacao leaves and pods growing under natural conditions and then testing the residual deposit at intervals. Tests with T. castaneum showed that when leaves were sprayed to drip point the residual toxicity of 1·25 and 2·5 per cent, technical DDT fell steadily and was negligible after an interval of three and six weeks, respectively; that of 0·25–2 per cent, γ BHC was negligible after 2–3 days. Corresponding tests with Mirids on pods were less consistent but suggested that 2·5 per cent, technical DDT was still effective against first-instar nymphs after three weeks; 0·25 per cent, γ BHC had a residual toxic effect for at least several days and depressed feeding greatly for at least a fortnight. It is suggested that BHC may have a local systemic action which persists after the surface deposit becomes ineffective.

Of the other insecticides tested, aldrin had a high toxicity and powerful fumigant action and appeared to be the most promising alternative to BHC.

It was concluded that BHC would be more effective than DDT when treating mature cacao because, in addition to its higher toxicity and quicker action, its fumigant action would compensate for incomplete coverage by low-volume spraying.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 1959 , pp. 13 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1949). West African Cacao Research Institute. Annual Report, 1947–1948.Google Scholar
Anon. (1951). Ibid., 1949–1950.Google Scholar
Anon. (1953). Ibid., 1950–1951.Google Scholar
Anon. (1954). Ibid., 1953–1954.Google Scholar
Anon. (1955). West African Cocoa Research Institute. Annual Report, 1954–1955.Google Scholar
Anon. (1956). West African Cocoa Research Institute. Quarterly Report no. 41, January–March 1956.Google Scholar
Anon. (1957 a). West African Cocoa Research Institute. Annual Report, 1955–1956.Google Scholar
Anon. (1957 b). Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture (Ghana) for the year 1954–55. Accra.Google Scholar
Cotterell, G. S. (1926). Preliminary study of the life-history and habits of Sahlbergella singularis Hagl. and Sahibergella theobroma Dist.—Bull. Dep. Agric. Gold Cst no. 3, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Cotterell, G. S. (1943). Entomology.—Rep. cent. Cocoa Res. Sta. Tafo 1938–42 pp. 46–55.Google Scholar
Crowdy, S. H. (1947). Observations on the pathogenicity of Calonectria rigidiuscula (Berk. & Br.) Sacc. on Theobroma cacao L.—Ann. appl. Biol. 34 pp. 45–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudgeon, G. C. (1910). Notes on two West African Hemiptera injurious to cocoa.—Bull. ent. Res. 1 pp. 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, A. J. P. (1952). A study of the digestive system of the West African cacao Capsid bugs (Hemiptera, Miridae).—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 122 pp. 543–572.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. S. (1957). Capsid control on mature cocoa.—New Gold Cst Fmr 1 pp. 109–115.Google Scholar
Raw, F. (1959). An insectary method for rearing cacao Mirids, Distantiella theobroma (Dist.) and Sahlbergella singularis Hagl.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. J. (1954). A summary of the results of Capsid research in the Gold Coast.—Tech. Bull. W. Afr. Cacao Res. Inst. no. 1, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. J. (1957). Efficiency of fog application of BHC.—Rep. W. Afr. Cocoa Res. Inst. 1955–56 pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. J. (1958). Pest control research at W.A.C.R.I.—Rep. Cocoa Conf. 1957 pp. 125–128.Google Scholar