Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T00:06:01.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on insecticide-impregnated targets for the control of riverine Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the sub-humid savanna zone of Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. A. Oladunmade ,
W. Takken ,
L. Dengwat  and
I. Ndams
M. A. Oladunmade
Affiliation:
Biological Control of Tsetse by the Sterile Insect Technique, Federal Department of Pest Control Services, P.O. Box 76, Vom, Nigeria
W. Takken
Affiliation:
Biological Control of Tsetse by the Sterile Insect Technique, Federal Department of Pest Control Services, P.O. Box 76, Vom, Nigeria
L. Dengwat
Affiliation:
Biological Control of Tsetse by the Sterile Insect Technique, Federal Department of Pest Control Services, P.O. Box 76, Vom, Nigeria
I. Ndams
Affiliation:
Biological Control of Tsetse by the Sterile Insect Technique, Federal Department of Pest Control Services, P.O. Box 76, Vom, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Insecticide-impregnated blue cotton targets 70 × 110 cm weretested for the control of Glossina palpalis palpalis (Robineau-Desvoidy) and G. tachinoides Westwood in riverine fringing forests in central Nigeria, under wet-season conditions. Following exposure to treated cloth for 1·5 min, delta-methrin caused 100% mortality of G. p. palpalis for six weeks at 0·05% and for 13 weeks at 0·1%. Dieldrin at 5% was not very effective. At 4%, endosulfan initially caused a high mortality, but rapidly lost its activity, especially against females. By chemical analysis, 43% of deltamethrin applied to the fabric was found to have been lost within 12 weeks, in which 230 mm of rainfall was recorded. Placed 150 m apart in a fringing forest, targets impregnated with 0·05% deltamethrin caused a rapid decline in the G. p. palpalis population, and after 12 weeks only 5% of the original density was recorded. No further reduction or significant increase was observed during the following six months, though it appeared that flies caught during this period had immigrated from an adjacent undisturbed riverine forest. The effect on G. tachinoides was less dramatic, but this may have been due to the low initial density of this species, and to its greater mobility, giving rise to reinvasion from elsewhere.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 275 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide.—J. econ. Ent. 18, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akthar, M. M. (1982). Gas chromatographic determination of deltamethrin in biological samples.—J. Chromat. 246, 81–87.Google Scholar
Challier, A. & Laveissière, C. (1974). Un nouveau pièe pour la capture des glossines (Glossina: Diptera, Muscidae): description et essais sur le terrain.—Cah. ORSTOM, Sér. Entomol. méd. Parasitol. 11, 251–262.Google Scholar
Challier, A., Eyraud, M. & Sales, S. (1977). Effectiveness on tsetse flies of residual deposits of three pyrethroids OMS-1821, 1998 and 2002, in comparison with an organochlorine OMS-570, in a Sudanian savanna gallery forest, Upper Volta.—8 pp. Geneva, WHO (Unpublished document no. WHO/VBC/77.670).Google Scholar
Davies, H. (1977). Tsetse flies in Nigeria.—3rd edn, 340 pp. lbadan, Nigeria, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gouteux, J. P., Challier, A., Laveissière, C. & Couret, D. (1982). l'utilisation des écrans dans la lutte anti-tsetse en zone forestière.—Tropenmed. & Parasitol. 33, 163–168.Google Scholar
Hargrove, J. W. (1977). Some advances in the trapping of tsetse (Glossina spp.) and other flies.—Ecol. Entomol. 2, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. M. & Green, C. H. (1984). Visual responses of tsetse flies to stationary targets.—Insect Sci. Applic. 5, 331–334.Google Scholar
Keay, R. W. J. (1953). An outline of Nigerian vegetation.—2nd edn, Lagos, Nigeria, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Laveissière, C. & Couret, D. (1980). Traps impregnated with insecticide for the control of riverine tsetse flies.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 74, 264–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laveissière, C. & Couret, D. (1981). Essai de lutte contre les glossines riveraines à l'aide d’écrans imprégnés d’insecticide.—Cah. ORSTOM, Sér. Entomol. méd. Parasitol. 19, 271–283.Google Scholar
Laveissière, C. & Couret, D. (1983). Dieldrine et écrans pour la lutte contre les glossines riveraines.—Cah. ORSTOM, Sér. Entomol. méd. Parasitol. 21, 57—62.Google Scholar
Laveissière, C., Couret, D. & Challier, A. (1979). Description and design details of a biconical trap used in the control of tsetse flies along the banks of rivers and streams.—17 pp. Geneva, WHO (Unpublished document no. WHO/VBC/79.746).Google Scholar
Maier-Bode, H. (1968). Properties, effect, residues and analysis of the insecticide endosulfan.—Residue Rev. 22, 1–44.Google ScholarPubMed